This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the American cinema task force. Animation: American Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This redirect is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance). Comics: United States Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This redirect is supported by United States comics work group. Fictional characters This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles Lists This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles

wasn't Slash also in the first NES turtles game? I think he was a middle-boss guarding tied-up Splinter on some rooftop.

I just looked at the walkthrough of the game [1], and Slash is not mentioned anywhere in it. Unless they used another name for him. -- Ritchy 13:57, 19 May 2006 (UTC) reply

The first TMNT NES game came out in 1989, and according to the official TMNT website, Slash first appeared in 1990, in the 1987 TMNT cartoon ("Slash: The Evil Turtle from Dimension X") and as a toy action figure. He first appeared in the TMNT Adventures comics in 1991.

Slash definitely wasn't in it. I played through this game many times and never encountered him.

J 1982

The one that you are thinking of, Ritchy, is Mechaturtle, a precursor to other robot turtles such as the T4 (Dreamwave) and Turtlebot (2003 video game/cartoon series). The S 21:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC) reply

I remember a blue Stone Warrior called Granitor from the arcade game, and the 1987 series, if I recall correctly. He had a bird-like face and stood taller than Traag... Why isn't this character mentionned anywhere? -- Dez26 02:16, 14 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Because no one tought of him until you reminded us. Feel free to add him to the list. -- Ritchy 02:31, 14 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Why is this character included in the list? She doesn't appear in any of the 7 major TMNT incarnations. In fact, she's only in a single videogame. The article states that only appearances count, not brief mentionings or references. From browsing the list, all characters listed have had some significant contribution to one or more of the 7 TMNT worlds. I really don't think Aska deserves to be on this list. If the videogames were counted as the 8th incarnation, then I can understand her inclusion. Otherwise, she seems very out of place. Ninja kid21 22:14, 21 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Well, according to what's written, she's apparently got some kind of fan following, so 'that's' probably cause for significance. And technically, doesn't a video game appearance count as an appearance? 72.72.200.21 23:26, 21 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Ya, I've noticed that she's got a cult following, and I can understand why when you see her in action. =) I do count being in a videogame as an appearance, but I'm only questioning her inclusion on the list because the article refers to the cartoons, comics, movies, and the Next Mutation. There's no mention of the videogames on that list, so Aska looks out of place. If you check the table, she's got red no's accross the board, which makes her seem like she's played no role in the TMNT world. I think the character list would be more organized if the videogames were included, or if Aska were dropped. However, I'd like to know how others feel about this, or if there are any other suggestions. Ninja kid21 23:47, 21 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Her having a cult following doesn't justify her being in the list. The real question is whether characters who only appear in videogames should be included. I think they should. After all, the videogames are part of the TMNT franchise, even if they are not part of the canon universe. The Image comics and Next Mutation are also not part of the canon, and they are included. Plus, most of the more detailed character pages include a description of that character's appearance in videogames. So I say we should add a "videogame" column to the table.
By the way, Aska is not the only videogame-only character in the list. Slashuur also only appeared in videogames. I see that in the table he is incorrectly listed as having appeared in one of the series. I'll correct that, and add the new column when I have time. -- Ritchy 01:48, 22 September 2006 (UTC) reply

I added the videogame column. There are a lot of unknowns, as I've never played the games based on the new series. I hope someone who's more familiar with them can fill in the missing information. -- Ritchy 03:11, 22 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Great work! The list looks much more comprehensive. Off the top of my head, I know for sure that Hun was in the newest videogames. I'm not so sure about the other characters, since I haven't been able to play through all of the games. I'll edit the table to add Hun's videogame appearance. Ninja kid21 15:33, 22 September 2006 (UTC) reply

I just realized that Professor Honeycutt (AKA Fugitoid) was also in the videogames. Fixed that as well. Ninja kid21 15:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC) reply

It now appears that TMNT (2007 film) will follow the continuity of the other movies (or at least the 1st and 2nd), and will not be the start of a new TMNT continuity. Therefore, I will merge its column with the movie column. -- Ritchy 19:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC) reply

I've noticed that there seems to be more emphasis on the animated counterparts of such characters as General Blanque and Lord Simultaneous instead of they're original comic counterparts, the same can be said for the organisations article, more specificaly the Triceraton section. I've considered adding information, but to do this I would need to overhaul the sections somewhat. -- Lord Crayak

Well the cartoon series is currently ongoing, and better known than the comics. It's only natural that people would have more information to add about the cartoon version of the characters. But by all means, add information about the comics, and overhaul sections when necessary. Also, if some character descriptions grow very long, feel free to move them to independant pages. -- Ritchy 15:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Right now, we have this page for TMNT characters, and that one for TMNT robots. However, I see a growing number of robots being included in this page, in large part thanks to the Fast Forward season of the current show, which introduced a number of robot characters (Serling and Constable Biggles are good examples). The recent addition of MetalHead to this page, even though it already is in the robot page, got me wondering: should we merge both pages?

The way I see it, several of the robots from the TMNT robot page could be included here (Chrome Dome, Metalhead, Turtlebot and Turtle Terminator). The robot teams (Domemoids, Mouser and Roadkill Rodney) could be included either in the TMNT organisation pages or in this one. The Footmech could go in the Foot Clan page, and the Turtle X would go in Cody Jones' page. Does that sound like a good idea to everyone? The alternative would be to take all the robot characters from this page and move them to the TMNT robot page, which I'm starting to feel would introduce an unnecessary distinction. -- Ritchy 16:59, 9 March 2007 (UTC) reply

I think it was ill-advised to delete the page without copying the articles here first. Probably the best solution would be to keep everything on the same page but add sub headings for different groups. Then if one section got too big it could be split of into its own page with a minimum of fuss. Now could someone pleas resurrect the mouser article, I’m trying to do some research here?-- Teletran ( talk) 13:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC) reply

This page is looking a bit untidy to me at the moment, so I was thinking; we could add sub-categories such as, humans, mutants, robots and aliens. This would give more structure to the page and elevate such controversy as we have recently had with the Robots page. In addition to this we could where applicable use a character data template to give additional information such as a character’s publication history aliases and group affiliations if any.-- Teletran ( talk) 11:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply

I failed to see him mentioned anywhere, I understand that he was a separate character from a different comic but he did appear in comics and in the Original Cartoon. At the very least it should link to his wikipedia article. Usagi Yojimbo

Xhadow 17:38, 13 March 2007 (UTC) reply

I agree. I came here today specifically trying to remember specifics of this character and was amazed to find him not listed considering he appeared in the comics and both animated shows.

KatzztaK 23:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Usagi Yojimbo, Gen, Panda Khan, and Cerebus all come from other comics. They really don't belong here as they are not TMNT characters. I can see how some people would be confused, though. Evan1975 02:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC) reply

As the article itself says, "This list is of appearances, a brief mentioning or reference is not counted." Even though these characters are not exclusive to TMNT, they still appeared, and in the case of Usagi Yojimbo, multiple times. I'm not saying they deserve a full blown article, a simple reference explaining their appearance and a link to their main article would suffice.

KatzztaK 15:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC) reply

I don't care either way, man. Evan1975 04:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC) reply

I noticed that my Spoiler Tags regarding info on TMNT 2003's Lost Season have been eliminated. Given its unaired-in-America status and the fact that most people haven't seen these episodes, I fail to see how labelling information regarding it as Spoilers is "unnecessary", at least during the first month or so (most of the Season only became available this week). I certainly know I'd be pissed to inadvertenly find out the fate of a character just because I chose to wait to see the episodes.

Ian

69.89.38.46 21:15, 13 March 2007 (UTC) reply

I am the one who removed the spoiler tags. My main issue was maintaining uniformity in the page. None of the other characters have spoiler tags, not even those who appear in the on-going Fast Forward season of the show. I simply didn't think it was necessary to put spoiler tags at all. Though I'm starting to fell it's not that good a reason, especially given the quantity of editing we'd need to do before all the character entries are standard and uniform. You can put them back in if you feel they are necessary. -- Ritchy 22:53, 13 March 2007 (UTC) reply

What the heck is "a giant anime-like creature"? A walking TV series? An animated DVD boxset? He causes people to argue over whether dubs or subs are better? It makes no sense! - masa ♫ 19:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Given the amount of new entries and how incomplete the list still is, I think this entry is in danger of becoming (if it hasn't already) far too unwieldly.

Suggestions? The only thing that currently occurs to me (aside from a significant purge of the more minor characters) is to split the list by incarnations (Mirage, Movies, 2003, etc.), and linking each smaller list to each incarnation's specific page. The now-separated table could remain as a master table uniting all characters. Mayor character appearing in more than one incarnation (the turtles, Karai, The Rat King) could remain as they are, while minor duplicate characters (Zippy Lad, Raptarr, Nobody) can be duplicated (albeit with information specific to each incarnation) with little trouble or bandwith usage. However, I fear the whole thing would be a massive undertaking, with much room for error, particularly given how undeveloped the separate entries for each incarnation are--I'm certainly open to other ideas.

Ian

69.89.37.185 01:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC) reply

I would be for that. Perhaps it would be best to separate characters based on series. The list has definitely grown because of minor characters and it would be better to just have them separate. I also think it will be better for visitors when it comes to a minor character that has appeared in different series.

Inner City Blues 03:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC) reply

I disagree. I believe that, when someone is searching for information on a given character in a given series, it is more relevant to them to also find information about that character in other series, rather than information about other characters in that series. In other words, bios of characters that appeared in multiple series should be kept together, not split on different pages to be together with bios of other characters from the same series.
If we need to split the page because it is becoming too big to handle, I'd recommmend rather splitting it alphabetically, as is the case, for example, for the List of Star Trek planets. This would accomplish the immediate goal of making the pages smaller and easier to manage, and would keep the bios of multiple-appearance characters unified. But in addition, it would be a much easier split to accomplish, and one much less likely to lead to errors. And it would allow future splitting - indeed, as the number of characters in on-going series continue to grow, we may reach a point where series-specific pages also become too big and unwieldly. But they are not dividable. With alphabetical divisions, the pages can be split endlessly. -- Ritchy 04:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Yeah, that sounds better. All we would need then, is to start doing it.

Ian

65.218.144.196 00:34, 17 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Someone tell me when we settled for delete all pictures and most relevent content. First you bunch up characters who you feel aren't important enough for their own pages, then you complain that there's too much information on one page. What the heck?

Can something be done about the 4.2 mi. long gap of blank space next to the table of contents —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.153.132.151 ( talk) 21:08, 15 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Since we've apparently begun adding members of the Ninja Tribunal to the list (with Juto), I have to ask: has any standard spelling for their names been determined. Is "Shisho" a last name (as is the entry), or an honorific, like "San" or "Sensei", as seems to be implied during the season? How is the word supposed to be spelled? The person who added Juto spelled it as "Shishou", which...doesn't seem right. Likewise, I've also seen Chikara refered to as "Chikara'Shisho". Is there someone fluent in Japanese who could help here?

Likewise, with the Acolytes, I think it'd be good to make sure we have the correct names before we begin adding them. While it's easy with characters like Tora Yoshida and Adam (who sadly, I don't recall getting a last name), it becomes a bit harder with Faragi and Joy, whose names seem to be pronounced different with each character that says it--is it Renard, or Reneau? Faragi or Farachi?

Ian

65.218.144.196 00:34, 17 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Well I haven't seen the episodes, but it's my understanding that they are only available on DVD. So whoever has added the info can easily turn on the subtitles on the episodes and see the correct spelling of the names when the characters are introduced. That would at least settle that issue. -- Ritchy 03:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Shishou (which could also be spelled "Shisho") is the master in an apprenticeship. The S 18:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC) reply

According to TMNT4Kids, who runs the official 4Kids TMNT site, their names are the following:

The Tribunal Kon Shisho Chikara Shisho Juto Shisho Hisomi Shisho

The Acolytes Joi Reynard Faraji Ngala Adam McKay Tora Yoshida 24.19.92.89 ( talk) 22:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Ok, "Nightmares Recycled" wasn't made because it was decided the subject matter wasn't suitable for children.

Let's see: In this show, Shredder gets decapitated (even though it isn't his real head), Baxter Stockman gets an eye put out, an arm chopped off, and his back broken, a Purple Dragon member is killed by Shredder, I could go on and on...

and this episode wasn't made because it would have had subject matter not suitable for children.

...Ok...

Gringo300 02:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Apparently, the rumor is that Hun and Garbageman were supposed to be seperated by a creepy backalley surgeon, and Garbageman was thrown in a dumpster and left to rot. Yeah... by kid's show standards... that's a bit disturbing. The S 18:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC) reply

And those other things AREN'T disturbing by kid's show standards? Gringo300 08:30, 16 May 2007 (UTC) reply

I just removed the Turtle Team, April, Casey, etc from this list, as they have their own articles that can be found just by clicking in the 'related' list.

While I understand what you're trying to do, some of the characters (Baxter Stockman, Karai, The Rat King, Bebop and Rocksteady, Lord Dregg, etc.) left behind in the current simply do not qualify as "less important"--heck, an argument can be made for Karai being more important than the Shredder himself. As it is now, the list merely looks wishy-washy and inconsistent. Ideas?

Ian ( 65.218.145.11 13:48, 22 July 2007 (UTC)) reply

If you're removing major characters, the article should be renamed something like List of minor Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles characters. Evan1975 19:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Agreed. That's what I came to say. I'd do it myself, but most lists will have redirect problems that I don't have time to fix. -- trlkly 19:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:BloodsuckerTMNT.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC) reply

These article is entirely too long. There needs to be major characters only. I request that editors who are familiar with the subject matter remove entries whose subjects are not as important. I have no knowledge of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, so I don't know. If someone who kows doesn't remove them, I will eventually do it myself, and may not remove according to importance within the series. seresin (talk) 23:30, 17 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Would it also be possible to break it apart into two seperate pages and call it List of minor Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles characters Part 1 and Part 2. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.59.237.110 ( talk) 15:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply

I respectfully disagree. I think the article should simply be split alphabetically into smaller lists (like A-E, F-J, etc.) as minor characters sometimes grow into larger characters and sometimes have more interest and material than major ones. Benjiboi 21:09, 10 January 2008 (UTC) reply

We do not need every single character that has ever appeared. There are certainly not 155 major characters in this series. I'll allow a bit more time for people who are knowledgable to edit, and then I'm going in. seresin | wasn't he just...? 22:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Unless there is someone who is pretty knowledgeable about the series, I don't think you should mess with it. However, it would be a good idea to split the lists into List of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles antagonists and List of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles protagonists. However, since there is already Category:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles characters, this list can be shortened by just redirecting all of the characters with pages to those pages and only keeping the entries for article-less characters. Just suggesting a few things...-- Mynameisnotpj ( talk) 01:45, 9 April 2008 (UTC) reply

This page has already been deleted, even after I suggested that it be merged with this one. Can anyone suggest how to get it back a proceed with a merger?-- Marktreut ( talk) 07:01, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Can someone add Bishop in. I don't know much about him. The first time I heard of him was in the Fast Forward series where the turtles know him well. 58.172.221.66 ( talk) 05:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Whoever keeps randomly sticking the word "British" in front of Fast Forward robot names and writing rubbish like "...tried to vote with a fake British accent...", please, for the love of everything good and holy, STOP. It's not amusing, and it has no basis on Wikipedia either way. 24.19.92.89 ( talk) 22:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Seriously, whoever keeps doing that, stop. This has been going on for more than three months now. What kick do you get out of vandalizing the page, you miscreants? 209.147.114.202 ( talk) 22:30, 19 June 2008 (UTC) reply

I believe that whoever was 'vandalizing' the page may have had honest intentions. Is it not possible that the robots are British? Lets discuss this before we go deleting it anymore —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.153.132.151 ( talk) 21:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC) reply

This article is in real need of chainsaw. I edited out some of the original research and weasel words that were plaguing some of the character descriptions, but the real problem is that most of this article is filled with nothing but thinly-disguised character-centric episode/issue guides of the series (like Slash's and Dr. Chaplin's). I know the TMNT franchise has numerous canons (the Mirage and Archie comics, both animated series, the movies, ect.) and most of them have common characters, but that doesn't mean we have to list every single character from every single piece of TMNT. Especially when they've only been in one video game or one film.

I suggest to divide this article into sections depending on the character's original appearance (i.e: introduced in the Mirage Comics series, introduced in the 1987 animated series, introduced in the film, ect.). Jonny2x4 ( talk) 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC) reply

I'm working on removing the issue and episode lists. It makes the article into a directory, which Wikipedia is not, and they also contribute in making the article obnoxiously long. -- Onore Baka Sama ( talk) 09:12, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply

I would seriously seperate the characters into their individual universes. I would start chronologically, so that the comic characters are ALL listed first (even if they were introduced last year). After that I would do the 1987 series. Then the movies. Finally the later series. I came here personally for the older material, but I'm sure plenty of younger people come for the newer stuff. It's confusing to me, as I don't know or recognize the majority of the characters. If they were grouped together, then I might be able to understand it better.

Grouping them alphabetically does nothing to keep similar stories and characters together. While it is the simplest fix for someone who knows nothing about the characters, it serves very little purpose in organizing the characters logically. They could be grouped alphabetically within each universe, but even then, it might be better to further categorize them first. For example you could have header1 be the universe, header2 be the alignment (good, bad, neutral) and then group them alphabetically or chronologically. Lime in the Coconut 16:29, 22 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Good plan, my good sir. However, I think it would probably be best to separate the article itself, as currently it is nearing 200KB in size, and Wikipedia says that articles over 32(?)KB should be the limit before one should consider splitting an article. I would suggest making this page a disambiguation page, listing the different lists of supporting characters from various universes.
I also think that there should be a strict limit and warning on this page as to not make this an exhaustive list of every single character that appears in Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles; there is an external wiki for this and most of these characters are non-notable. -- Onore Baka Sama ( talk) 18:56, 8 February 2010 (UTC) reply

I just thought I'd mention that the statement that "Silver is the last Yeti" within the continuity of "Ninja Turtles: The Next Mutation" show is now questionable if you take into account the Power Rangers universe as being part of that continuity (due to the "Power Rangers: In Space" cross-over episode). This is because in "Power Rangers: Operation Overdrive" a supporting character named Norg (who is also a Yeti) was introduced. This might not seem like a big deal as they are two completely different seasons/teams of Rangers which seems like they could be easily ruled out as a seperate continuity (like the multiple TMNT shows for example), except that all "Power Ranger" seasons have on multiple occassions been said/proven to take place within the same universe/continuity. In fact, "Power Rangers: In Space" and "Power Rangers: Operation Overdrive" can be directly connected by two characters that have briefly appeared in both seasons, Alpha 6 and Adam Park (who was the second Mighty Morphin Black Ranger, the Zeo Green Ranger, and first Turbo Green Ranger). 172.190.37.160 ( talk) 10:57, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply

The section read as "Leonardo's feline girlfriend and love interest, who lives in Chinese Atlantis in China. Her design was based on Master Viper from Kung fu Panda movie. She dresses unusually compared to the other characters in the series, and wearing clothing in the style of Nekeeta from Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go. She wears her white dress in the style of Ella from Happily N'Ever After."
Aside from the exceedingly dubious description, this smacks of someone inserting their own fan character into the article, especially since several Google searches turned up absolutely zero relevant links. I've removed the section entirely, since there seems to be no evidence the character exists outside of this page. so sayeth Lucky Number 49 ^{Yell at me!} 14:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC) reply

There is no reason for this franchise to have two separate pages listing its characters. This list is the one that covers the entire franchise, so all the characters should be listed here. Merging in the remaining characters from the 1987 television series list will result in a page that will still be a reasonable size. As such, List of characters in Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (1987 TV series) should be merged here. Neelix ( talk) 16:22, 24 June 2010 (UTC) reply

ONLY supporting characters that are either actually important to the storylines or have critical reception and/or are also playable in the games, plz - the rest should be in to TMNT Wikia OR to the other articles here on Wikipedia. -- 194.145.185.229 ( talk) 14:12, 15 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Fugitoid isn't in the character list at all and he's in several continuities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.219.106.16 ( talk) 14:50, 18 September 2011 (UTC) reply

What about the hundreds of characters from Batman, Spider-Man, G.I. Joe, and Transformers which all have their own articles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.44.161.103 ( talk) 21:11, 2 February 2013 (UTC) reply

How do you define "important to the storylines"? Which storylines, and how you determine if a character has "critical reception"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.44.161.103 ( talk) 05:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Someone added a last name to this character despite the fact that it is not mentioned in her one cartoon appearance. She did not appear in any comics or videogames or any other identifiable source. If there is some sort of external source such as the creator/writer/voice actress/etc's blog then link to it. Wikipedia isn't the sort of place for someone to push their personal fanon. ( 98.108.236.238 ( talk) 21:54, 29 January 2012 (UTC)) reply

teenaje mutant ninja turtle ,,,,fan fan fan de tmnt 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.191.10.7 ( talk) 23:55, 23 May 2015 (UTC) reply