![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Star Trek (film series) page were merged into List of Star Trek television series. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (23 March 2019) |
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Personally I think it's an obvious move to bring this more into line with other similar List of film/TV franchise articles. But, notably, Star Trek (film series) is actually about three film franchises, which are connected to the TV series in the same overall franchise. Putting it one page just makes more sense.
I suggest moving the cast/crew-related sections to List of Star Trek production staff. The Even-Odd popularity section really belongs on Cultural influence of Star Trek. If there's no strong objection, I'll make this page a redirect once I'm sure all the information has been replicated elsewhere. UpdateNerd ( talk) 19:13, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
This was an awfully short discussion. I wish there was more discussion over this. Oldag07 ( talk) 16:42, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
While I'm not sold on the article series, I do reject the wisdom of redirecting the page here. First off, I'm not sure it makes sense to have a list of films and television series combined, given you're combining two different mediums. Secondly, this isn't a list. It's short paragraphs linking to the actual relevant lists of episodes. This is structured more like an article than a list, and in that case this is colliding into redundancy with the main Star Trek article (at this point, I don't see the point of this article at all when there should be a List of Star Trek films and then the existing List of Star Trek: X episodes. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 18:55, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Per MOS:SANDWICH, I recommend removing the lead actor images. This was the solution applied to Star Trek. Rdzogschen ( talk) 08:09, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:List of Star Trek episodes#Proposed changes. -- /
Alex/
21
12:04, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled Star Trek sequel. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 17:27, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
A caption of one of the article's images says that
Avery Brooks played Captain Benjamin Sisko in Deep Space Nine, commander of the titular space station
. This put a question in my mind which, I see, I'm not the first to puzzle about:
Do Female Astronauts Wear Bras in Space? I feel the article should address this issue.
E
Eng
00:00, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
@ 50.35.56.25: The section header in the table cannot be titled "Future television series", as that creates two links to "Future television series"; the section header (first) and the actual prose section itself (second), causing the "Future television series" link in the Table of Contents to direct to the section header as the first linked entry instead of the correct prose section. Thus, the section header in the table requires a different title (and therefore link), per MOS:HEAD. -- / Alex/ 21 17:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Prodigy and Strange New Worlds are in production. Section 31 is still on hold at best, and the other two series are speculative. I don't think the series in production should be categorized with series that haven't been officially announced. Oldag07 ( talk) 12:12, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Since the merge of Lists of TV series and films (carried out by myself a year and a half ago), there have been so many developments, including two new TV shows (with many more debuting soon), and now at least one forthcoming film. Looking at the Table of Contents is headache-inducing, and I think it's a no-brainer to split the articles into two again as soon as possible. UpdateNerd ( talk) 09:52, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
I edited the image caption of Sonequa Martin-Green's image from "Commander Michael Burnham" to "Captain Michael Burnham", but it was changed back under the reasoning that she was "Introduced as Commander. Specifics can be listed in the series' article.". However, so was Benjamin Sisko, but the caption of the image discussing him still says "Captain". So, I'm not understanding the reasoning here. Thank you for your time. Obi-WanKenobi-2005 ( talk) 13:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
The info on the upcoming Dominion War series was reverted due to an "unreliable source" (Giant Freakin Robot). Why is this source considered unreliable? They have an editorial policy, and I can't see any bans on it in WP:RSP. Kidburla ( talk) 21:36, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Is The Animated Celebration a separate series, or (as I stated in my edit summary) does "five all-new animated promotional spots" mean something more akin to a series' related webisodes? -- Alex_21 TALK 23:53, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
So the version of the article we have settled on seems to be a bit of a mixture of what was discussed above. I think it is confusing to include Short Treks in the overview table and episode count for the franchise, but not list it with the other series in the "Released series" section. And we are including Very Short Treks here but we had considered leaving it off this list and I think there is merit there, it is a set of promotional shorts and including it on the full list of "Star Trek television series" is being very generous. I propose we remove Very Short Treks and move Short Treks back to the main list. Any thoughts on that? And on how to handle such a change in the main navbox? - adamstom97 ( talk) 12:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
This was first suggested at Talk:Star Trek/Archive 9#Splitting TV series into subsections back in 2019 and I think there is good reason to revisit it. I am proposing that we use headings to split the list of series into the "classic" series and the "modern" series, rather than just having one big list of series. This would be similar to how List of Star Trek films is organised. All of the series from Discovery onwards have been produced by Kurtzman and many of the same crew, they all come from the same production deal, have all been created for Paramount+ (even if Prodigy was removed from it), and I think it just makes sense to treat them all as a sub-group of the franchise that is different from the previous shows. I don't know what the best headings are for the split so happy for suggestions. - adamstom97 ( talk) 03:43, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Moving the suggestions for potential divides here from the other discussion:
Any further thoughts on these ideas? I personally think broadcast and streaming makes the most sense. - adamstom97 ( talk) 12:21, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Star Trek (film series) page were merged into List of Star Trek television series. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (23 March 2019) |
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Personally I think it's an obvious move to bring this more into line with other similar List of film/TV franchise articles. But, notably, Star Trek (film series) is actually about three film franchises, which are connected to the TV series in the same overall franchise. Putting it one page just makes more sense.
I suggest moving the cast/crew-related sections to List of Star Trek production staff. The Even-Odd popularity section really belongs on Cultural influence of Star Trek. If there's no strong objection, I'll make this page a redirect once I'm sure all the information has been replicated elsewhere. UpdateNerd ( talk) 19:13, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
This was an awfully short discussion. I wish there was more discussion over this. Oldag07 ( talk) 16:42, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
While I'm not sold on the article series, I do reject the wisdom of redirecting the page here. First off, I'm not sure it makes sense to have a list of films and television series combined, given you're combining two different mediums. Secondly, this isn't a list. It's short paragraphs linking to the actual relevant lists of episodes. This is structured more like an article than a list, and in that case this is colliding into redundancy with the main Star Trek article (at this point, I don't see the point of this article at all when there should be a List of Star Trek films and then the existing List of Star Trek: X episodes. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 18:55, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Per MOS:SANDWICH, I recommend removing the lead actor images. This was the solution applied to Star Trek. Rdzogschen ( talk) 08:09, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:List of Star Trek episodes#Proposed changes. -- /
Alex/
21
12:04, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled Star Trek sequel. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 17:27, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
A caption of one of the article's images says that
Avery Brooks played Captain Benjamin Sisko in Deep Space Nine, commander of the titular space station
. This put a question in my mind which, I see, I'm not the first to puzzle about:
Do Female Astronauts Wear Bras in Space? I feel the article should address this issue.
E
Eng
00:00, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
@ 50.35.56.25: The section header in the table cannot be titled "Future television series", as that creates two links to "Future television series"; the section header (first) and the actual prose section itself (second), causing the "Future television series" link in the Table of Contents to direct to the section header as the first linked entry instead of the correct prose section. Thus, the section header in the table requires a different title (and therefore link), per MOS:HEAD. -- / Alex/ 21 17:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Prodigy and Strange New Worlds are in production. Section 31 is still on hold at best, and the other two series are speculative. I don't think the series in production should be categorized with series that haven't been officially announced. Oldag07 ( talk) 12:12, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Since the merge of Lists of TV series and films (carried out by myself a year and a half ago), there have been so many developments, including two new TV shows (with many more debuting soon), and now at least one forthcoming film. Looking at the Table of Contents is headache-inducing, and I think it's a no-brainer to split the articles into two again as soon as possible. UpdateNerd ( talk) 09:52, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
I edited the image caption of Sonequa Martin-Green's image from "Commander Michael Burnham" to "Captain Michael Burnham", but it was changed back under the reasoning that she was "Introduced as Commander. Specifics can be listed in the series' article.". However, so was Benjamin Sisko, but the caption of the image discussing him still says "Captain". So, I'm not understanding the reasoning here. Thank you for your time. Obi-WanKenobi-2005 ( talk) 13:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
The info on the upcoming Dominion War series was reverted due to an "unreliable source" (Giant Freakin Robot). Why is this source considered unreliable? They have an editorial policy, and I can't see any bans on it in WP:RSP. Kidburla ( talk) 21:36, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Is The Animated Celebration a separate series, or (as I stated in my edit summary) does "five all-new animated promotional spots" mean something more akin to a series' related webisodes? -- Alex_21 TALK 23:53, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
So the version of the article we have settled on seems to be a bit of a mixture of what was discussed above. I think it is confusing to include Short Treks in the overview table and episode count for the franchise, but not list it with the other series in the "Released series" section. And we are including Very Short Treks here but we had considered leaving it off this list and I think there is merit there, it is a set of promotional shorts and including it on the full list of "Star Trek television series" is being very generous. I propose we remove Very Short Treks and move Short Treks back to the main list. Any thoughts on that? And on how to handle such a change in the main navbox? - adamstom97 ( talk) 12:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
This was first suggested at Talk:Star Trek/Archive 9#Splitting TV series into subsections back in 2019 and I think there is good reason to revisit it. I am proposing that we use headings to split the list of series into the "classic" series and the "modern" series, rather than just having one big list of series. This would be similar to how List of Star Trek films is organised. All of the series from Discovery onwards have been produced by Kurtzman and many of the same crew, they all come from the same production deal, have all been created for Paramount+ (even if Prodigy was removed from it), and I think it just makes sense to treat them all as a sub-group of the franchise that is different from the previous shows. I don't know what the best headings are for the split so happy for suggestions. - adamstom97 ( talk) 03:43, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Moving the suggestions for potential divides here from the other discussion:
Any further thoughts on these ideas? I personally think broadcast and streaming makes the most sense. - adamstom97 ( talk) 12:21, 29 April 2024 (UTC)