![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Now that I have some free time, I would be able to create article pages for the remainder of the Season 1. Mind you, it will not be just a brief synopsis. It is going to be a full explanation on what went on in the episode as I've done with all of the Season 2 Desperate Housewives episodes (e.g. sample). The individual episodes will hopefully contain the full synospsis of each character's story i.e. the Nate & Brenda, David & Keith, Ruth, Claire stories + quotes, trivia and pictures. It's going to take a little while but its well worth it. Sfufan2005 17:31, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
It would have been a good idea if there were pages of most of the episodes. But most of them doesn't have their own inimitable page. So till they'll have, the best for now is to split between the episode's deaths and synopsis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.178.227.209 ( talk) 12:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
I think there are better pictures avalable on HBO.com for the episodes. Ecotone, for example, should have a picture of Nate in the hospital which obviously has more significance for the episode rather than a picture of David alone. I'm finishing the series up for the first time so I don't want to work on it now but I might do it later this month if thats okay.-- CyberGhostface 03:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Greetings, Six Feet Under editors!
As you may be aware, for the last several weeks there has been extensive discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television) about how Wikipedia articles on television episodes should be named. Editors from many areas of Wikipedia, including members of several different television WikiProjects, have worked together and come up with a general guideline that article titles should include disambiguating phrases only when there is another article on Wikipedia with the same name as the episode name. Thus, if you were creating episode articles for Knight Rider, the episode Circus Knights would not need any disambiguation, whereas Nobody Does It Better (Knight Rider) would, in order to differentiate it from Nobody Does It Better (song). However, the guideline also recommends that Circus Knights (Knight Rider) and Circus Knights (Knight Rider episode) exist as redirects to the episode.
The discussion has been fairly well-advertised at the Village Pump, in many WikiProjects' talk pages and on the talk pages of many television program episode lists. However, the editors contributing to the discussion at WP:TV-NC felt that it was appropriate to make one last call for discussion before people started moving episode articles to new names.
I've noticed that many episodes of Six Feet Under are pre-emptively disambiguated: for example, "Everyone's Waiting" is at Everyone's Waiting (Six Feet Under episode), even though there is no Wikipedia article at Everyone's Waiting. If you feel that there are strong reasons for this that have not already been considered, please join the discussion at WT:TV-NC. (The current recommendations have been reached after much consideration, and are based on a long discussion about how to best comply with Wikipedia's general article naming scheme.) Barring further discussion, I'll start moving Six Feet Under episode pages in accordance with the guideline in the next few days.
We appreciate the work that editors do in every area of Wikipedia, and want you to feel included in the decision-making process. Thank you for your help! — Josiah Rowe ( talk • contribs) 02:07, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
All of the episodes of this series fail the notability guidelines for television episodes. The way for these articles to be improved is through the inclusion of real-world information from reliable sources to assert notability. That is unlikely to happen, and these only have certain bad aspects (though all may not apply) like containing overly long or one sentence plot summaries, trivia, and quotes. Per that, they need to be a small part of this list.
If there are no objections, these will be redirected soon. Otherwise, discussion will take place here. Please remember that this is not a vote. If you like the information, that's fine and dandy, but your opinion doesn't really count towards anything. The only opinions that do count are ones that that lean towards the inclusion of real world information. TTN 22:47, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
A couple days after this was converted to a redirect, someone recreated the article at the alternate title Everyone's Waiting (Six Feet Under episode). This suggests there is not consensus to "merge" this particular episode. While both forms of the article lack reliable independent sourcing, the original article contained a lot of key plot information about the epilogue which should probably be centralized somewhere rather than spread out over a bunch of character bios. —dgies t c 17:59, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
List of Six Feet Under deaths would have a very hard time surviving AfD. But since exactly one "funny" death happens in each episode, the information may be reasonably saved by merging the info into this episode list, similar to what e.g. Lost (season 1) does with the featured main characters or List of Carnivàle episodes with the locations. Opposition? – sgeureka t•c 03:43, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
All of the MOS sections I've seen (I just checked WP:MOS, MOS:LINK, and WP:OVERLINK) say that links which do not add to the understanding of the article should be avoided - linking to individual years is presented as an example of this. Also, multiple links to the same article (like the dozens of links to 2001 in this article) are a bad idea. There is no quality info gained by linking to March 21 or June 2, or other individual days - the same is true of linking to the same year 20 or 30 times. Links to regular old nouns, like drama and retrospective are also presented as an example of what not to do. That's why I was removing them. - Special-T ( talk) 23:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Right-O then! - Special-T ( talk) 00:22, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion or exclusion of episode and character, as well as other fiction articles. Please visit the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip ( talk) 11:06, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
can someone atlest put and article for the first episode in the series —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.47.239.238 ( talk) 06:43, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on List of Six Feet Under episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:05, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 38 external links on List of Six Feet Under episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2003/jun03/jun02/3_wed/news5wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2001/june01/june18/3_wed/news2wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2001/june01/june25/3_wed/news2wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2001/july01/july16/3_wed/news1wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2001/july01/july30/3_wed/news1wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2002/apr02/apr01/3_wed/news3wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2002/apr02/apr08/3_wed/news4wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2002/apr02/apr15/3_wed/news3wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2002/apr02/apr29/3_wed/news4wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2002/may02/may13/3_wed/news4wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2003/mar03/mar10/3_wed/news3wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2003/apr03/apr07/3_wed/news4wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2004/Jul04/Jul06/4_thurs/news3thursday.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:30, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Now that I have some free time, I would be able to create article pages for the remainder of the Season 1. Mind you, it will not be just a brief synopsis. It is going to be a full explanation on what went on in the episode as I've done with all of the Season 2 Desperate Housewives episodes (e.g. sample). The individual episodes will hopefully contain the full synospsis of each character's story i.e. the Nate & Brenda, David & Keith, Ruth, Claire stories + quotes, trivia and pictures. It's going to take a little while but its well worth it. Sfufan2005 17:31, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
It would have been a good idea if there were pages of most of the episodes. But most of them doesn't have their own inimitable page. So till they'll have, the best for now is to split between the episode's deaths and synopsis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.178.227.209 ( talk) 12:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
I think there are better pictures avalable on HBO.com for the episodes. Ecotone, for example, should have a picture of Nate in the hospital which obviously has more significance for the episode rather than a picture of David alone. I'm finishing the series up for the first time so I don't want to work on it now but I might do it later this month if thats okay.-- CyberGhostface 03:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Greetings, Six Feet Under editors!
As you may be aware, for the last several weeks there has been extensive discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television) about how Wikipedia articles on television episodes should be named. Editors from many areas of Wikipedia, including members of several different television WikiProjects, have worked together and come up with a general guideline that article titles should include disambiguating phrases only when there is another article on Wikipedia with the same name as the episode name. Thus, if you were creating episode articles for Knight Rider, the episode Circus Knights would not need any disambiguation, whereas Nobody Does It Better (Knight Rider) would, in order to differentiate it from Nobody Does It Better (song). However, the guideline also recommends that Circus Knights (Knight Rider) and Circus Knights (Knight Rider episode) exist as redirects to the episode.
The discussion has been fairly well-advertised at the Village Pump, in many WikiProjects' talk pages and on the talk pages of many television program episode lists. However, the editors contributing to the discussion at WP:TV-NC felt that it was appropriate to make one last call for discussion before people started moving episode articles to new names.
I've noticed that many episodes of Six Feet Under are pre-emptively disambiguated: for example, "Everyone's Waiting" is at Everyone's Waiting (Six Feet Under episode), even though there is no Wikipedia article at Everyone's Waiting. If you feel that there are strong reasons for this that have not already been considered, please join the discussion at WT:TV-NC. (The current recommendations have been reached after much consideration, and are based on a long discussion about how to best comply with Wikipedia's general article naming scheme.) Barring further discussion, I'll start moving Six Feet Under episode pages in accordance with the guideline in the next few days.
We appreciate the work that editors do in every area of Wikipedia, and want you to feel included in the decision-making process. Thank you for your help! — Josiah Rowe ( talk • contribs) 02:07, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
All of the episodes of this series fail the notability guidelines for television episodes. The way for these articles to be improved is through the inclusion of real-world information from reliable sources to assert notability. That is unlikely to happen, and these only have certain bad aspects (though all may not apply) like containing overly long or one sentence plot summaries, trivia, and quotes. Per that, they need to be a small part of this list.
If there are no objections, these will be redirected soon. Otherwise, discussion will take place here. Please remember that this is not a vote. If you like the information, that's fine and dandy, but your opinion doesn't really count towards anything. The only opinions that do count are ones that that lean towards the inclusion of real world information. TTN 22:47, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
A couple days after this was converted to a redirect, someone recreated the article at the alternate title Everyone's Waiting (Six Feet Under episode). This suggests there is not consensus to "merge" this particular episode. While both forms of the article lack reliable independent sourcing, the original article contained a lot of key plot information about the epilogue which should probably be centralized somewhere rather than spread out over a bunch of character bios. —dgies t c 17:59, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
List of Six Feet Under deaths would have a very hard time surviving AfD. But since exactly one "funny" death happens in each episode, the information may be reasonably saved by merging the info into this episode list, similar to what e.g. Lost (season 1) does with the featured main characters or List of Carnivàle episodes with the locations. Opposition? – sgeureka t•c 03:43, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
All of the MOS sections I've seen (I just checked WP:MOS, MOS:LINK, and WP:OVERLINK) say that links which do not add to the understanding of the article should be avoided - linking to individual years is presented as an example of this. Also, multiple links to the same article (like the dozens of links to 2001 in this article) are a bad idea. There is no quality info gained by linking to March 21 or June 2, or other individual days - the same is true of linking to the same year 20 or 30 times. Links to regular old nouns, like drama and retrospective are also presented as an example of what not to do. That's why I was removing them. - Special-T ( talk) 23:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Right-O then! - Special-T ( talk) 00:22, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion or exclusion of episode and character, as well as other fiction articles. Please visit the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip ( talk) 11:06, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
can someone atlest put and article for the first episode in the series —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.47.239.238 ( talk) 06:43, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on List of Six Feet Under episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:05, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 38 external links on List of Six Feet Under episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2003/jun03/jun02/3_wed/news5wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2001/june01/june18/3_wed/news2wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2001/june01/june25/3_wed/news2wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2001/july01/july16/3_wed/news1wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2001/july01/july30/3_wed/news1wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2002/apr02/apr01/3_wed/news3wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2002/apr02/apr08/3_wed/news4wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2002/apr02/apr15/3_wed/news3wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2002/apr02/apr29/3_wed/news4wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2002/may02/may13/3_wed/news4wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2003/mar03/mar10/3_wed/news3wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2003/apr03/apr07/3_wed/news4wednesday.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2004/Jul04/Jul06/4_thurs/news3thursday.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:30, 27 December 2017 (UTC)