A member of the Guild of Copy Editors reviewed a version of this article for copy editing. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{ copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! |
Material from List of PlayStation Vita games (A–L) was split to List of PlayStation Vita games (M–Z) on 05:24, 22 August 2015‎. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:List of PlayStation Vita games (A–L). |
Material from List of PlayStation Vita games (A–D) was split to List of PlayStation Vita games (E–H) on 17:51, 15 December 2020‎. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
Material from List of PlayStation Vita games (A–D) was split to List of PlayStation Vita games (I–L) on 17:51, 15 December 2020‎. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
I changed the title True Goddess Reincarnation into it's japanese name Shin Megami Tensei because it's better known as SMT and there's currently no title in the series named True Goddess Blabla. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.217.157.129 ( talk) 11:45, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Who the hell keeps removing Jak and Daxter? It's been announced.
Actually, it hasn't been. I won't delete it (and am not the one doing it) but there has been no such title announced. You should source it if you feel otherwise. Also, don't use the main page to argue. Keep it on the talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.230.191.181 ( talk) 06:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
I took it down. Jak and Daxter has not been announced by High Impact Games and it most definitely wasn't announced by Naughty Dog. Running a search on Google for "A New Legacy Begins" brought up nothing.
Does anyone wanna tackle this monstrosity? 99.246.249.112 ( talk) 06:00, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Isn't the Vita going to be region free? If so, isn't the North America, Europe and Japan cells unnecessary?-- 81.233.90.31 ( talk) 00:06, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
There's also the problem of language support. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.207.205 ( talk) 09:02, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Does anyone know what "[REGION] only" in the PSTV column exactly means? I thought it's region free, so that doesn't make much sense to me. Besides, do i need to have the game and/or the PSTV in the specific region, or is it just about the used PSN account? (This seems like patronizing / licensing issues to me anyways). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.139.13.131 ( talk) 09:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Obviously, I'm not being neutral or fair in my assessment of the situation, but see this as spiteful and frustrated constructive criticism from someone who actually enjoys the Vita platform very much. Many different game developers and publishers have publicly stated that it is SCEA and SCEE who are responsible for adding new titles to the Vita TV/PS TV whitelists, and that often they have no power over the situation (case in point being official Tweets from Xseed Games and Idea Factory International), however if you contact Sony Customer Support, they come up with some excuse blaming the game publishers instead. It's up to you whose side of the story you wish to believe—Sony or the publishers—but keep in mind that more than one publisher has spoken out about this.
Will there also be Star Wars games be released?? 91.113.7.241 ( talk) 15:59, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
What does this refer to? I would like to get rid of the remaining unknowns but I don't even know what I'm looking for. Memory Card is easy, says it on the box. But I don't know how a Vita title is supposed to connect to a PS3 to qualify for a "Yes" in that category. Anyone care to explain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.230.191.181 ( talk) 05:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom had a feature that allowed you to use the Vita as a PS3 controller. MLB 2012: The Show allowed you to share save data between Vita and PS3 versions. I'm assuming it means something along those lines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.207.205 ( talk) 09:03, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Anyone else think it might be beneficial to differentiate between those titles available via retail flash carts and those available via the PS Store? Maybe a column with the possible entries of Cartridge/Download/Both? TowheadJeff ( talk) 20:40, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Saw this under Europe release date "Fall 2012" Can someone please tell me what Fall is? Never in my life heard that before. Tcla75 ( talk) 10:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Uhm, Fall comes after Summer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.79.2.203 ( talk) 06:53, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
It has a release date of 27 Set. 2012 because it have enough differences with the game it was based of (Earth Defense Force 2017): new enemies, the inclusion of the PaleWing unit, online multiplayer and possibly more levels. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShiryuOfTheRain ( talk • contribs) 01:51, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
oh was that what the other version was? I thought it was something else. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomastaz ( talk • contribs) 02:25, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Tried googling it and nothing seems to show up, is this info legit ?
Cheers,
83.9.140.63 ( talk) 20:09, 7 March 2013 (UTC)Inquisitio
Please avoid marking this column as a "no" simply because there isn't a western physical release. Games such as Totori+ and Dokuro have physical copy releases in Japan and the rest of Asia. --  æŽåšæ°Â | — Talk contribs email 18:11, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
So, I think the "partial" is being over used. Here's how I see it
Anyways, I'll probably start cleaning this up unless there's a lot of disagreement on this... Sergecross73 msg me 18:51, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Sony has announced the PS Vita TV at their pre-TGS press conference, which is a variant of the PS Vita full console without a screen which plugs directly into a television; not all Vita games will be compatible with the PS Vita TV, such as those that rely on touchscreen gameplay mechanisms. Sony has compiled an official list of games compatible with the PS Vita TV. Should we create another column within the table which represents PSVTV compatibility? -- benlisquare T• C• E 11:06, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
I honestly don't think this section is necessary.
Hence, I have removed the section. Feel free to revert if you seriously disagree, however I do believe that the section was out of place. -- benlisquare T• C• E 05:32, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
A few source links.
http://uk.playstation.com/psvita/apps/
http://us.playstation.com/psvita/apps/
http://uk.ign.com/wikis/ps-vita/Apps
http://www.pocketgamer.co.uk/r/PS+Vita/PlayStation+Vita/feature.asp?c=48522
http://community.us.playstation.com/t5/PlayStation-General/The-List-Of-Free-PS-Vita-Games-PSM-Games-and-Apps/td-p/39561293
The part about the launch titles which you removed, I think you should undo as I did see the list on the Vita page, but that list seems like its only for 1 region, and not really a lunch list if it's going to leave off the original launch titles, unless this is only meant to cover the states, which is why I put the information above the games table, so its clear for the different regions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zer0n9ne ( talk • contribs) 08:15, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Ok, didn't want to end up writing a paragraph on each app, I will just add back the table in the normal section and make it invisible, and we can make edits to it there, can keep you informed here if you like or in the notes where the table is being edited if you want, when it seems ok we can remove the hide code or whatever it's called.
Also added back the Launch Games info in the above the games table for the reasons stated earlier. - Zer0n9ne ( talk) 09:52, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Why is it important to track canceled games? They do not add anything to the list at all. The focus should be put towards games that are actually "Available" for the system itself, not games that don't exist and will more than likely never exist. This applies to the 3DS list as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.69.97.62 ( talk) 03:23, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
All in all, even if they will never see a proper release, a cancelled Vita game is still a Vita game, and this page is a list of Vita games. The purpose of this page is to document information relating to Vita games, and isn't exactly supposed to be a "buyers' guide" or anything like that to begin with, meaning that it should aim to cover what it needs to cover, rather than being a page that is specifically "useful" to consumers. -- benlisquare T• C• E 03:37, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
If Wikipedia doesn't cater to specific tastes then why did you delete all my work on making the PS Vita list more presentable? According to you Wikipedia doesn't cater to specific tastes and yet you chose to delete my work to cater to people who view wikipedia on mobile. Sorry, but that is glaring contradiction that I have to point out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.69.97.62 ( talk) 03:53, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Furthermore, there were structural formatting problems with your most recent edits as well: As an example, you made the Genre and Developer columns very large, while the title column was smaller - why should the Genre column take up so much space and form a large proportion of the table, when the text contents at most consist of a few words which would hardly fit the entire column? In addition, the Genre is hardly the most important aspect of a game - the title is - and so due weight needs to be given to the columns based on necessity.
Finally, the PS TV compatibility column needs to meet verifiability standards, hence the citations to SCE Japan and SCE America; "presentability" should not gimp verifiability, a cornerstone Wikipedia policy, in any way. The citations which were removed actually serve a purpose relating to policy. -- benlisquare T• C• E 04:04, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
All of the other current consoles/handhelds have their exclusivity column, why not PS Vita? -- Bronyman87 ( talk) 02:33, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
An extra column has been added to List of PlayStation 4 games in order to identify games that have cross-platform play between PS Vita and PS4. If knowledgeable editors could help fill-in the blanks, that would be great. — TPX 23:31, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
I think it might be of benefit to include a column or icon on games that are in the IGC, so people can look back and see the titles they have already, would benefit people who have just purchased a Vita TV to be able to see what of their collection they can download onto the console, and that which they can not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.33.186 ( talk) 15:10, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
I can't find the official press release but many sites have it and the Vita version is clearly stated. We can see the Vita box at the end of the official trailer on Youtube. And the game is pre-orderable on Amazon.com... Keenout ( talk) 08:31, 3 February 2016 (UTC) Same on the official twitter of the game: https://twitter.com/LSWGame — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keenout ( talk • contribs) 14:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Since Sony is not updating anymore the compatibility official page, one way to be sure is to test by ourselves. Even the descriptions of the games on the store do not always indicate the information. Nonetheless, Reviews2Go compatibility page seems to be a reliable source (for NA games) --> http://www.reviews2go.com/playstation-tv-compatible-games-north-america/ Keenout ( talk) 08:13, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I was hoping if we could get a template for the game's that weren't released for the platform. There are probably some games that have a release date on its wiki page that wasn't put in with the game on the list. But overall, could we add a table for the number of games that are labeled 'Unreleased'? And this goes for the M to Z list as well. Zacharyalejandro ( talk) 16:34, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of PlayStation Vita games (A–L). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:43, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Some games are listed as having physical versions in regions where they weren't ever released physically. It can be hard enough to find a source explicitly stating this for a relatively well-known game, but it's proving near impossible in the case of International Snooker, a more obscure game. Searching for pictures of the physical cartridge or box on Google turns up no results whatsoever; searching for it on eBay and other marketplaces also yields no results. It's very clear this game was never released physically, but, since I can't find an explicit source, my edits keep being reverted. What can be done about this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.246.86.206 ( talk) 23:30, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on List of PlayStation Vita games (A–L). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:26, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Why did they removed it? I used to access this article quite a lot only to see if there were physical versions versions of the games i wanted to buy, since the memory card is limited. In fact, i only made an wikipedia account to complain about this. HSARG ( talk) 01:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
I don't know but now this list is very bad and useles, if we can't know which game got a physical release or not... MrSushi95 ( talk) 18:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Unsourced is something that can easily be fixed, and I don't see how its in violation. Nearly every game release on the vita mentions physical or digital release, so it is mentioned in game articles. If it such a huge issue then clearly it was being used here and doesn't need to be removed.
@ Dissident93:, is it OK if I create separate lists for physical games (like the PS4 list)? Sillent DX ( talk) 09:53, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
+1 With Sillent DX, i'm near totally retired from editing Wikipedia but this article is one of the few i'm still watching. The point of sourcing such separate list won't be much an issue as in Japan near only publishers website explicitly tell the price of the physical version & the one of the digital edition as their prices differ and for the West the PS Vita community put pressure on publishers for physical release that they have to explicitly tell if there is going to be a physical release. Now about why "knowing what exists in physical format is important" in details this matter the most to anyone collecting physical PS Vita games and in macroscopic view this matter to anyone studying how dematerialized gaming affect or not the PS Vita you can do statistic per regions, genre, release year etc. Thanks for reading the comment of an old timer of Wikipedia. -- KrebMarkt ( talk) 15:07, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Why? It's not the case for other games (like the NES). Splitting up the table like this severely reduces usability, as it's not possible to sort all games by release date etc. And why so many sections? 0-9, A-D etc. Cortador ( talk) 07:33, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A member of the Guild of Copy Editors reviewed a version of this article for copy editing. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{ copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! |
Material from List of PlayStation Vita games (A–L) was split to List of PlayStation Vita games (M–Z) on 05:24, 22 August 2015‎. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:List of PlayStation Vita games (A–L). |
Material from List of PlayStation Vita games (A–D) was split to List of PlayStation Vita games (E–H) on 17:51, 15 December 2020‎. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
Material from List of PlayStation Vita games (A–D) was split to List of PlayStation Vita games (I–L) on 17:51, 15 December 2020‎. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
I changed the title True Goddess Reincarnation into it's japanese name Shin Megami Tensei because it's better known as SMT and there's currently no title in the series named True Goddess Blabla. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.217.157.129 ( talk) 11:45, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Who the hell keeps removing Jak and Daxter? It's been announced.
Actually, it hasn't been. I won't delete it (and am not the one doing it) but there has been no such title announced. You should source it if you feel otherwise. Also, don't use the main page to argue. Keep it on the talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.230.191.181 ( talk) 06:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
I took it down. Jak and Daxter has not been announced by High Impact Games and it most definitely wasn't announced by Naughty Dog. Running a search on Google for "A New Legacy Begins" brought up nothing.
Does anyone wanna tackle this monstrosity? 99.246.249.112 ( talk) 06:00, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Isn't the Vita going to be region free? If so, isn't the North America, Europe and Japan cells unnecessary?-- 81.233.90.31 ( talk) 00:06, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
There's also the problem of language support. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.207.205 ( talk) 09:02, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Does anyone know what "[REGION] only" in the PSTV column exactly means? I thought it's region free, so that doesn't make much sense to me. Besides, do i need to have the game and/or the PSTV in the specific region, or is it just about the used PSN account? (This seems like patronizing / licensing issues to me anyways). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.139.13.131 ( talk) 09:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Obviously, I'm not being neutral or fair in my assessment of the situation, but see this as spiteful and frustrated constructive criticism from someone who actually enjoys the Vita platform very much. Many different game developers and publishers have publicly stated that it is SCEA and SCEE who are responsible for adding new titles to the Vita TV/PS TV whitelists, and that often they have no power over the situation (case in point being official Tweets from Xseed Games and Idea Factory International), however if you contact Sony Customer Support, they come up with some excuse blaming the game publishers instead. It's up to you whose side of the story you wish to believe—Sony or the publishers—but keep in mind that more than one publisher has spoken out about this.
Will there also be Star Wars games be released?? 91.113.7.241 ( talk) 15:59, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
What does this refer to? I would like to get rid of the remaining unknowns but I don't even know what I'm looking for. Memory Card is easy, says it on the box. But I don't know how a Vita title is supposed to connect to a PS3 to qualify for a "Yes" in that category. Anyone care to explain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.230.191.181 ( talk) 05:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom had a feature that allowed you to use the Vita as a PS3 controller. MLB 2012: The Show allowed you to share save data between Vita and PS3 versions. I'm assuming it means something along those lines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.207.205 ( talk) 09:03, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Anyone else think it might be beneficial to differentiate between those titles available via retail flash carts and those available via the PS Store? Maybe a column with the possible entries of Cartridge/Download/Both? TowheadJeff ( talk) 20:40, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Saw this under Europe release date "Fall 2012" Can someone please tell me what Fall is? Never in my life heard that before. Tcla75 ( talk) 10:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Uhm, Fall comes after Summer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.79.2.203 ( talk) 06:53, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
It has a release date of 27 Set. 2012 because it have enough differences with the game it was based of (Earth Defense Force 2017): new enemies, the inclusion of the PaleWing unit, online multiplayer and possibly more levels. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShiryuOfTheRain ( talk • contribs) 01:51, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
oh was that what the other version was? I thought it was something else. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomastaz ( talk • contribs) 02:25, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Tried googling it and nothing seems to show up, is this info legit ?
Cheers,
83.9.140.63 ( talk) 20:09, 7 March 2013 (UTC)Inquisitio
Please avoid marking this column as a "no" simply because there isn't a western physical release. Games such as Totori+ and Dokuro have physical copy releases in Japan and the rest of Asia. --  æŽåšæ°Â | — Talk contribs email 18:11, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
So, I think the "partial" is being over used. Here's how I see it
Anyways, I'll probably start cleaning this up unless there's a lot of disagreement on this... Sergecross73 msg me 18:51, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Sony has announced the PS Vita TV at their pre-TGS press conference, which is a variant of the PS Vita full console without a screen which plugs directly into a television; not all Vita games will be compatible with the PS Vita TV, such as those that rely on touchscreen gameplay mechanisms. Sony has compiled an official list of games compatible with the PS Vita TV. Should we create another column within the table which represents PSVTV compatibility? -- benlisquare T• C• E 11:06, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
I honestly don't think this section is necessary.
Hence, I have removed the section. Feel free to revert if you seriously disagree, however I do believe that the section was out of place. -- benlisquare T• C• E 05:32, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
A few source links.
http://uk.playstation.com/psvita/apps/
http://us.playstation.com/psvita/apps/
http://uk.ign.com/wikis/ps-vita/Apps
http://www.pocketgamer.co.uk/r/PS+Vita/PlayStation+Vita/feature.asp?c=48522
http://community.us.playstation.com/t5/PlayStation-General/The-List-Of-Free-PS-Vita-Games-PSM-Games-and-Apps/td-p/39561293
The part about the launch titles which you removed, I think you should undo as I did see the list on the Vita page, but that list seems like its only for 1 region, and not really a lunch list if it's going to leave off the original launch titles, unless this is only meant to cover the states, which is why I put the information above the games table, so its clear for the different regions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zer0n9ne ( talk • contribs) 08:15, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Ok, didn't want to end up writing a paragraph on each app, I will just add back the table in the normal section and make it invisible, and we can make edits to it there, can keep you informed here if you like or in the notes where the table is being edited if you want, when it seems ok we can remove the hide code or whatever it's called.
Also added back the Launch Games info in the above the games table for the reasons stated earlier. - Zer0n9ne ( talk) 09:52, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Why is it important to track canceled games? They do not add anything to the list at all. The focus should be put towards games that are actually "Available" for the system itself, not games that don't exist and will more than likely never exist. This applies to the 3DS list as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.69.97.62 ( talk) 03:23, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
All in all, even if they will never see a proper release, a cancelled Vita game is still a Vita game, and this page is a list of Vita games. The purpose of this page is to document information relating to Vita games, and isn't exactly supposed to be a "buyers' guide" or anything like that to begin with, meaning that it should aim to cover what it needs to cover, rather than being a page that is specifically "useful" to consumers. -- benlisquare T• C• E 03:37, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
If Wikipedia doesn't cater to specific tastes then why did you delete all my work on making the PS Vita list more presentable? According to you Wikipedia doesn't cater to specific tastes and yet you chose to delete my work to cater to people who view wikipedia on mobile. Sorry, but that is glaring contradiction that I have to point out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.69.97.62 ( talk) 03:53, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Furthermore, there were structural formatting problems with your most recent edits as well: As an example, you made the Genre and Developer columns very large, while the title column was smaller - why should the Genre column take up so much space and form a large proportion of the table, when the text contents at most consist of a few words which would hardly fit the entire column? In addition, the Genre is hardly the most important aspect of a game - the title is - and so due weight needs to be given to the columns based on necessity.
Finally, the PS TV compatibility column needs to meet verifiability standards, hence the citations to SCE Japan and SCE America; "presentability" should not gimp verifiability, a cornerstone Wikipedia policy, in any way. The citations which were removed actually serve a purpose relating to policy. -- benlisquare T• C• E 04:04, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
All of the other current consoles/handhelds have their exclusivity column, why not PS Vita? -- Bronyman87 ( talk) 02:33, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
An extra column has been added to List of PlayStation 4 games in order to identify games that have cross-platform play between PS Vita and PS4. If knowledgeable editors could help fill-in the blanks, that would be great. — TPX 23:31, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
I think it might be of benefit to include a column or icon on games that are in the IGC, so people can look back and see the titles they have already, would benefit people who have just purchased a Vita TV to be able to see what of their collection they can download onto the console, and that which they can not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.33.186 ( talk) 15:10, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
I can't find the official press release but many sites have it and the Vita version is clearly stated. We can see the Vita box at the end of the official trailer on Youtube. And the game is pre-orderable on Amazon.com... Keenout ( talk) 08:31, 3 February 2016 (UTC) Same on the official twitter of the game: https://twitter.com/LSWGame — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keenout ( talk • contribs) 14:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Since Sony is not updating anymore the compatibility official page, one way to be sure is to test by ourselves. Even the descriptions of the games on the store do not always indicate the information. Nonetheless, Reviews2Go compatibility page seems to be a reliable source (for NA games) --> http://www.reviews2go.com/playstation-tv-compatible-games-north-america/ Keenout ( talk) 08:13, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I was hoping if we could get a template for the game's that weren't released for the platform. There are probably some games that have a release date on its wiki page that wasn't put in with the game on the list. But overall, could we add a table for the number of games that are labeled 'Unreleased'? And this goes for the M to Z list as well. Zacharyalejandro ( talk) 16:34, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of PlayStation Vita games (A–L). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:43, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Some games are listed as having physical versions in regions where they weren't ever released physically. It can be hard enough to find a source explicitly stating this for a relatively well-known game, but it's proving near impossible in the case of International Snooker, a more obscure game. Searching for pictures of the physical cartridge or box on Google turns up no results whatsoever; searching for it on eBay and other marketplaces also yields no results. It's very clear this game was never released physically, but, since I can't find an explicit source, my edits keep being reverted. What can be done about this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.246.86.206 ( talk) 23:30, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on List of PlayStation Vita games (A–L). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:26, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Why did they removed it? I used to access this article quite a lot only to see if there were physical versions versions of the games i wanted to buy, since the memory card is limited. In fact, i only made an wikipedia account to complain about this. HSARG ( talk) 01:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
I don't know but now this list is very bad and useles, if we can't know which game got a physical release or not... MrSushi95 ( talk) 18:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Unsourced is something that can easily be fixed, and I don't see how its in violation. Nearly every game release on the vita mentions physical or digital release, so it is mentioned in game articles. If it such a huge issue then clearly it was being used here and doesn't need to be removed.
@ Dissident93:, is it OK if I create separate lists for physical games (like the PS4 list)? Sillent DX ( talk) 09:53, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
+1 With Sillent DX, i'm near totally retired from editing Wikipedia but this article is one of the few i'm still watching. The point of sourcing such separate list won't be much an issue as in Japan near only publishers website explicitly tell the price of the physical version & the one of the digital edition as their prices differ and for the West the PS Vita community put pressure on publishers for physical release that they have to explicitly tell if there is going to be a physical release. Now about why "knowing what exists in physical format is important" in details this matter the most to anyone collecting physical PS Vita games and in macroscopic view this matter to anyone studying how dematerialized gaming affect or not the PS Vita you can do statistic per regions, genre, release year etc. Thanks for reading the comment of an old timer of Wikipedia. -- KrebMarkt ( talk) 15:07, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Why? It's not the case for other games (like the NES). Splitting up the table like this severely reduces usability, as it's not possible to sort all games by release date etc. And why so many sections? 0-9, A-D etc. Cortador ( talk) 07:33, 7 September 2022 (UTC)