This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of PlayStation Portable games article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "List of PlayStation Portable games" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1 |
|
|
Could the page say "There are at least currently number games" ? BatmobileFire ( talk) 05:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Where's Ape Escape Saru Saru? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.123.163.108 ( talk) 02:03, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
There really is no reason to have to discuss this, but I figured that if anyone had a reason not to merge them that I had not thought of, then go ahead. With the new table format, the two columns cover both articles. MrKIA11 ( talk) 21:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Why do the servers get shut down? Wouldn't it be beneficial to Sony if the servers were kept running for a longer time period? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.34.10.224 ( talk) 20:07, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Just for the record, I think having a list for all PSP infrastructure games is still a good thing. The small column on the main game list doesn't have room for important information like server status or game play type. I think having the list-at-a-glance is much more useful to a user interested in looking up new infrastructure games than having to sort through the entire list of PSP games. Just my opinion.-- Transce080 ( talk) 04:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Please don't merge. It's very useful to have a list of multiplayer PSP titles in a separate article. Netrat_msk ( talk) 12:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Instead of there being 1 column to show what regions a game was released in, should there be an individual column for each of the 4 main regions, and then a check mark or something under each one where the game was released? This would make it easy to see what games were released in a certain region by sorting the table by that column, but then the order of release would be lost, so which is more important? MrKIA11 ( talk) 19:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
I was looking through the list and I noticed there is no column for genre. Unless there is a particular reason why there shouldn't be one I would suggest adding it. What do the rest of you think? Cyrus777 ( talk) 17:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Is it just me or are more than half the games in 'future releases' already released? I can't be too sure. Confirm? Farslayer ( talk) 11:46, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Yea, I saw some of the games that were already released in the 'future releases' column, i'll try to fix it as well KB9 ( talk) 23:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Well, it seems that the section needs more updating... If I have free time I'll check out if the "future releases for 2009" were released that year, and add them to already released games. hypersk ( talk) 16:30, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
There's a lot of Japanese exclusive releases missing from the list. Were they left out for a particular reason? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiat justitia ruat caelum ( talk • contribs) 17:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
The answer to your question is, no, they weren't left out for a particular reason. I don't think it's a bad idea to include Japanese games in the list. Shouldn't we strive to make the list as complete as possible? Many people buy import games, especially on the PSP since it does not enforce region restrictions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Transce080 ( talk • contribs) 01:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
It is a list of PSP games, and not a list of English PSP games. Wikipedia is a place for all knowledge, not just the knowledge that most Westerners would be interested in (must be unbiased, therefore, we can't neglect Japanese games). Also, many Japanese games already have their own article. Why shouldn't they be included? --darkfeline 12:37:22 3 Aug 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.254.49.12 ( talk) 19:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Is Pilot Academy going to be released in the US? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.61.222.72 ( talk) 17:25, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Well IGN says they are. [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.61.222.72 ( talk) 16:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
I think there should be a games count information on the page. Can it be done automatically from the table? Cirocco ( talk) 21:06, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Can someone add a list of all co-op games in this list? its a wonderful page, that info can make it fantastic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.12.53.9 ( talk) 06:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
I'd like to see a list of what firmware each game requires added as a column on here -- 76.215.139.218 ( talk) 20:37, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Do you realize that you're not the only editor? I personally think the future releases section is great to keep separated. The reason games are listed multiple times, if you would look closely, is that they are released on different days in different places. The redlinked titles also don't look good. MrKIA11 ( talk) 21:01, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
I would just like to comment that the PSP is a relatively new platform. 100KB+ is pretty big, and the size of the article is just going to continue to grow. It might be best to split the article into individual articles covering 5- or 10-year periods, and move the unreleased games to its own article as well. As for the release dates/regions, why not just use the {{ vgrelease}} template (or the variant designed specifically for tables) to list the release dates/regions in a single column? If a game has not been released yet in a particular region, you can just specify "TBA" for that region. See Chronology of console role-playing games: 1995 to 1999 for an example. SharkD ( talk) 22:04, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Anyway, you should at least write the release dates in YYYY-MM-DD format, because otherwise table sorting doesn't work. SharkD ( talk) 16:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
I see this has been discussed extensively above but it doesn't really look like anything came of it. It seems insane to me to have a separate row for every release date and publisher. Potentially, you'd have a row for every English-speaking country in the world. It seems completely inefficient. Simply as a user (not an editor) I was baffled by the article when I first came to it to look something up. The fact that the default sort on each table is different is confusing. I forget what game I was actually looking for but as an example, say I trying to look up the Australian release date for Gran Turismo: I'd first look down the first list of games I came to and would notice that it wasn't there. Then I'd probably scroll down further and find that unreleased games are listed separately and realise that it might not of been released yet. Then I'd see an entry for Gran Turismo as coming out on 1 October but notice that's in Europe. I wouldn't know which way to look for the AUS one so I'd have to look all the way up and down the table for it. You may say "read the page properly then!" but most readers don't and shouldn't have to. It should be intuitive. This is made more confusing by the fact that the List of PlayStation 3 games and List of downloadable PlayStation games (which also lists PSP games) are arranged differently. Far from the suggestions above that the current layout is more user-friendly, I think it's extremely unuser-friendly. My thinking is that a user is going to come to this article with a game in-mind expecting to find a list of PSP games where they can easily look-up the release date for it. Having separate lists assumes the user knows whether the game has been released yet or not. From an editor's perspective, I've just added a release date for a game and moved already released games into the top list. This took ages. The page load times were very long considering the amount of information that the article provides and having to move items from a date-sorted list to an alpha-sorted one was a pain. In general, updating the page is far more complicated than it needs to be.
As a minor note, is there a reason why Template:dts can't be used instead of the hidden span workaround? This would also help cut down the page size. Chimpanzee - User | Talk | Contribs 14:07, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
{{
dts}}
can't be used because there are too many dates, unless they have recently changed the limit for template calls.
MrKIA11 (
talk)
15:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)I think should have only the games released =0
-- Ekans La Cobra ( talk) 00:22, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Sony announced a Rock band game to be released on the PSP. Why is it not in this table? Tubularbells1993 ( talk) 12:22, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm not authorized to fix this, so. . .: There's no country named Australasia. I'm sure it's meant to be Australia and then Asia. Mia (cannot disclose personal information at this time) 71.125.137.160 ( talk) 20:48, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
As of 4/22/2010 midnight...I noticed the row with "Dante's Inferno" is off. It appears to end before completing the "Released Regions". Instead it is populated by information for Daxter. Seeing this on Firefox 3.6.3. Not entirely familiar with the editing of a complex list straight off the bat so maybe someone can look at it? AnimeKid ( talk) 07:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
There is a need to update the list of games in this sections:
These games were released recently so they must be put under released:
112.201.186.163 ( talk) 01:16, 13 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.201.186.163 ( talk) 01:14, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
The Red Star - Relased: Mar 18, 2010 - Action Game - Publisher: XS Games - AdHoc: No - Infrastructure: No - GameSharing: No
CLICK...if you dare! ( talk) 17:44, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
The game is now released, should not be on future release section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.76.144.202 ( talk) 16:52, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Ello' to the people that actually help with this article page, was curious about some of the non-added games on here, I want to add as many as possible that I know are out, but many of tehm were only released in japan and don't have pages, so would it be alright if I went ahead & added them, or should I wait and make pages for them, or just add them all to the talk page?
How about a list sorted by release date? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.91.180.152 ( talk) 13:49, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
This game does not exist on the psp; only for nintendo ds. AnthonyTheGamer ( talk) 20:41, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Anthonythegamer
Right now there are a lot of PS1 games that are part of the list, but I don't see the point of mixing games from two systems, even if one can play the others titles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyclonex45 ( talk • contribs) 22:24, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
No, PS1 games shouldn't be in the list, if they are bor both platforms, nd only directing to the PS1 game, yet it notes that tehre is a psp version of it, yet that page in particular doesn't exist, then it would be fine, other then that, PS1 games should be removed from the PSP game list. Click...If you dare! o,0` ( talk) 13:15, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
I am a PSP collector that has been looking for a list of physical retail releases in the US. The list of games here is extensive but still incomplete (I've added a few). The trouble I found was that the release information for all regions is in a single column which makes sorting that column useless. I propose eliminating the columns for adhoc/wifi/gamesharing (this can/should be found on individual game pages)and replacing them with columns for NA/JP/EU/AUS region, with the release date in the applicable boxes and a blank if it didn't release in that region. I realize I could just do this myself (and I would, gladly) but I don't want to do a bunch of work just to have an admin revert it or something. Rswslowman ( talk) 16:14, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
RCR had a PSP version released on July 19, 2016. And yes, I mean a PSP version, which is different from the Vita version and really does run on my PSP-2000. It was never on UMD but you can download it if you buy RCR for PS3.
The last working version of the table was in November 2019. After someone tried to re-arrange the columns in December 2019, now it's really broken. In the "Publisher" and "Developer" columns, there is a date on some of the rows rather than a company name. Similarly some company info is appearing in release date columns. Kidburla ( talk) 15:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
I'm not a wikipedia editor, in fact I have no clue of how to edit a page but I couldn't help but notice that the game Jungle Party linked to the political party in Iran and not the child-friendly game. Decided to point this out because maybe other games are incorrectly linked as well??? Twelvedegrees ( talk) 00:27, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
I noticed that this list is missing the Mune Kyun Otome Collection, which was a series of budget re-releases of certain D3 Publisher otome games. As far as I know all of the games were already released on the PSP before that, so none should be particularly unique besides the packaging and serials, but they have separate entries on the PlayStation website (ex. the Last Escort Club Katze one can be found on that wiki page). Should we include these re-releases as separate entries? Londonbeat41692 ( talk) 11:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
A training game made for Hilton employees, it's definitely boring, but it trains new employees for the new thing. It is also verified by links. 204.100.235.134 ( talk) 16:55, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
The first entry is -8 and that just isn't a game that exists. i would correct it myself but i am scared of it being something someone mistyped and removing the entry entirely — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.24.90.209 ( talk) 04:10, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Moving this title from the List of PlayStation minis page to this main one.
Source is a blog post on the official PlayStation website describing a sale with items on discount, which lists the title under the "Full Games" section and not the "minis" section.
Retronuc ( talk) 23:01, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
It is a game based on an Argentinian Telenovela and it is not listed here.
• https://blog.es.playstation.com/2011/08/01/patito-feo-el-juego-ms-bonito-a-precio-de-ganga/ 168.243.186.111 ( talk) 20:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of PlayStation Portable games article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "List of PlayStation Portable games" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Could the page say "There are at least currently number games" ? BatmobileFire ( talk) 05:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Where's Ape Escape Saru Saru? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.123.163.108 ( talk) 02:03, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
There really is no reason to have to discuss this, but I figured that if anyone had a reason not to merge them that I had not thought of, then go ahead. With the new table format, the two columns cover both articles. MrKIA11 ( talk) 21:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Why do the servers get shut down? Wouldn't it be beneficial to Sony if the servers were kept running for a longer time period? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.34.10.224 ( talk) 20:07, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Just for the record, I think having a list for all PSP infrastructure games is still a good thing. The small column on the main game list doesn't have room for important information like server status or game play type. I think having the list-at-a-glance is much more useful to a user interested in looking up new infrastructure games than having to sort through the entire list of PSP games. Just my opinion.-- Transce080 ( talk) 04:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Please don't merge. It's very useful to have a list of multiplayer PSP titles in a separate article. Netrat_msk ( talk) 12:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Instead of there being 1 column to show what regions a game was released in, should there be an individual column for each of the 4 main regions, and then a check mark or something under each one where the game was released? This would make it easy to see what games were released in a certain region by sorting the table by that column, but then the order of release would be lost, so which is more important? MrKIA11 ( talk) 19:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
I was looking through the list and I noticed there is no column for genre. Unless there is a particular reason why there shouldn't be one I would suggest adding it. What do the rest of you think? Cyrus777 ( talk) 17:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Is it just me or are more than half the games in 'future releases' already released? I can't be too sure. Confirm? Farslayer ( talk) 11:46, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Yea, I saw some of the games that were already released in the 'future releases' column, i'll try to fix it as well KB9 ( talk) 23:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Well, it seems that the section needs more updating... If I have free time I'll check out if the "future releases for 2009" were released that year, and add them to already released games. hypersk ( talk) 16:30, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
There's a lot of Japanese exclusive releases missing from the list. Were they left out for a particular reason? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiat justitia ruat caelum ( talk • contribs) 17:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
The answer to your question is, no, they weren't left out for a particular reason. I don't think it's a bad idea to include Japanese games in the list. Shouldn't we strive to make the list as complete as possible? Many people buy import games, especially on the PSP since it does not enforce region restrictions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Transce080 ( talk • contribs) 01:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
It is a list of PSP games, and not a list of English PSP games. Wikipedia is a place for all knowledge, not just the knowledge that most Westerners would be interested in (must be unbiased, therefore, we can't neglect Japanese games). Also, many Japanese games already have their own article. Why shouldn't they be included? --darkfeline 12:37:22 3 Aug 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.254.49.12 ( talk) 19:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Is Pilot Academy going to be released in the US? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.61.222.72 ( talk) 17:25, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Well IGN says they are. [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.61.222.72 ( talk) 16:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
I think there should be a games count information on the page. Can it be done automatically from the table? Cirocco ( talk) 21:06, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Can someone add a list of all co-op games in this list? its a wonderful page, that info can make it fantastic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.12.53.9 ( talk) 06:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
I'd like to see a list of what firmware each game requires added as a column on here -- 76.215.139.218 ( talk) 20:37, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Do you realize that you're not the only editor? I personally think the future releases section is great to keep separated. The reason games are listed multiple times, if you would look closely, is that they are released on different days in different places. The redlinked titles also don't look good. MrKIA11 ( talk) 21:01, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
I would just like to comment that the PSP is a relatively new platform. 100KB+ is pretty big, and the size of the article is just going to continue to grow. It might be best to split the article into individual articles covering 5- or 10-year periods, and move the unreleased games to its own article as well. As for the release dates/regions, why not just use the {{ vgrelease}} template (or the variant designed specifically for tables) to list the release dates/regions in a single column? If a game has not been released yet in a particular region, you can just specify "TBA" for that region. See Chronology of console role-playing games: 1995 to 1999 for an example. SharkD ( talk) 22:04, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Anyway, you should at least write the release dates in YYYY-MM-DD format, because otherwise table sorting doesn't work. SharkD ( talk) 16:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
I see this has been discussed extensively above but it doesn't really look like anything came of it. It seems insane to me to have a separate row for every release date and publisher. Potentially, you'd have a row for every English-speaking country in the world. It seems completely inefficient. Simply as a user (not an editor) I was baffled by the article when I first came to it to look something up. The fact that the default sort on each table is different is confusing. I forget what game I was actually looking for but as an example, say I trying to look up the Australian release date for Gran Turismo: I'd first look down the first list of games I came to and would notice that it wasn't there. Then I'd probably scroll down further and find that unreleased games are listed separately and realise that it might not of been released yet. Then I'd see an entry for Gran Turismo as coming out on 1 October but notice that's in Europe. I wouldn't know which way to look for the AUS one so I'd have to look all the way up and down the table for it. You may say "read the page properly then!" but most readers don't and shouldn't have to. It should be intuitive. This is made more confusing by the fact that the List of PlayStation 3 games and List of downloadable PlayStation games (which also lists PSP games) are arranged differently. Far from the suggestions above that the current layout is more user-friendly, I think it's extremely unuser-friendly. My thinking is that a user is going to come to this article with a game in-mind expecting to find a list of PSP games where they can easily look-up the release date for it. Having separate lists assumes the user knows whether the game has been released yet or not. From an editor's perspective, I've just added a release date for a game and moved already released games into the top list. This took ages. The page load times were very long considering the amount of information that the article provides and having to move items from a date-sorted list to an alpha-sorted one was a pain. In general, updating the page is far more complicated than it needs to be.
As a minor note, is there a reason why Template:dts can't be used instead of the hidden span workaround? This would also help cut down the page size. Chimpanzee - User | Talk | Contribs 14:07, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
{{
dts}}
can't be used because there are too many dates, unless they have recently changed the limit for template calls.
MrKIA11 (
talk)
15:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)I think should have only the games released =0
-- Ekans La Cobra ( talk) 00:22, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Sony announced a Rock band game to be released on the PSP. Why is it not in this table? Tubularbells1993 ( talk) 12:22, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm not authorized to fix this, so. . .: There's no country named Australasia. I'm sure it's meant to be Australia and then Asia. Mia (cannot disclose personal information at this time) 71.125.137.160 ( talk) 20:48, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
As of 4/22/2010 midnight...I noticed the row with "Dante's Inferno" is off. It appears to end before completing the "Released Regions". Instead it is populated by information for Daxter. Seeing this on Firefox 3.6.3. Not entirely familiar with the editing of a complex list straight off the bat so maybe someone can look at it? AnimeKid ( talk) 07:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
There is a need to update the list of games in this sections:
These games were released recently so they must be put under released:
112.201.186.163 ( talk) 01:16, 13 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.201.186.163 ( talk) 01:14, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
The Red Star - Relased: Mar 18, 2010 - Action Game - Publisher: XS Games - AdHoc: No - Infrastructure: No - GameSharing: No
CLICK...if you dare! ( talk) 17:44, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
The game is now released, should not be on future release section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.76.144.202 ( talk) 16:52, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Ello' to the people that actually help with this article page, was curious about some of the non-added games on here, I want to add as many as possible that I know are out, but many of tehm were only released in japan and don't have pages, so would it be alright if I went ahead & added them, or should I wait and make pages for them, or just add them all to the talk page?
How about a list sorted by release date? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.91.180.152 ( talk) 13:49, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
This game does not exist on the psp; only for nintendo ds. AnthonyTheGamer ( talk) 20:41, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Anthonythegamer
Right now there are a lot of PS1 games that are part of the list, but I don't see the point of mixing games from two systems, even if one can play the others titles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyclonex45 ( talk • contribs) 22:24, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
No, PS1 games shouldn't be in the list, if they are bor both platforms, nd only directing to the PS1 game, yet it notes that tehre is a psp version of it, yet that page in particular doesn't exist, then it would be fine, other then that, PS1 games should be removed from the PSP game list. Click...If you dare! o,0` ( talk) 13:15, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
I am a PSP collector that has been looking for a list of physical retail releases in the US. The list of games here is extensive but still incomplete (I've added a few). The trouble I found was that the release information for all regions is in a single column which makes sorting that column useless. I propose eliminating the columns for adhoc/wifi/gamesharing (this can/should be found on individual game pages)and replacing them with columns for NA/JP/EU/AUS region, with the release date in the applicable boxes and a blank if it didn't release in that region. I realize I could just do this myself (and I would, gladly) but I don't want to do a bunch of work just to have an admin revert it or something. Rswslowman ( talk) 16:14, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
RCR had a PSP version released on July 19, 2016. And yes, I mean a PSP version, which is different from the Vita version and really does run on my PSP-2000. It was never on UMD but you can download it if you buy RCR for PS3.
The last working version of the table was in November 2019. After someone tried to re-arrange the columns in December 2019, now it's really broken. In the "Publisher" and "Developer" columns, there is a date on some of the rows rather than a company name. Similarly some company info is appearing in release date columns. Kidburla ( talk) 15:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
I'm not a wikipedia editor, in fact I have no clue of how to edit a page but I couldn't help but notice that the game Jungle Party linked to the political party in Iran and not the child-friendly game. Decided to point this out because maybe other games are incorrectly linked as well??? Twelvedegrees ( talk) 00:27, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
I noticed that this list is missing the Mune Kyun Otome Collection, which was a series of budget re-releases of certain D3 Publisher otome games. As far as I know all of the games were already released on the PSP before that, so none should be particularly unique besides the packaging and serials, but they have separate entries on the PlayStation website (ex. the Last Escort Club Katze one can be found on that wiki page). Should we include these re-releases as separate entries? Londonbeat41692 ( talk) 11:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
A training game made for Hilton employees, it's definitely boring, but it trains new employees for the new thing. It is also verified by links. 204.100.235.134 ( talk) 16:55, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
The first entry is -8 and that just isn't a game that exists. i would correct it myself but i am scared of it being something someone mistyped and removing the entry entirely — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.24.90.209 ( talk) 04:10, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Moving this title from the List of PlayStation minis page to this main one.
Source is a blog post on the official PlayStation website describing a sale with items on discount, which lists the title under the "Full Games" section and not the "minis" section.
Retronuc ( talk) 23:01, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
It is a game based on an Argentinian Telenovela and it is not listed here.
• https://blog.es.playstation.com/2011/08/01/patito-feo-el-juego-ms-bonito-a-precio-de-ganga/ 168.243.186.111 ( talk) 20:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC)