List of Ohio county name etymologies is a former featured list. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page and why it was removed. If it has improved again to featured list standard, you may renominate the article to become a featured list. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Former featured list |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Under the Columbiana entry, this line occurs:
Howe states "Kilbourn, in his 'Gazeteer,' says: 'Columbiana is a fancy name, taken from the names Columbus and Anna'"
I first thought that this line was gibberish, but after deleting it and having someone re-instate it, I realize it isn't completely meaningless. Someone should change way it is written, perhaps even adding the source that this information ACTUALLY appears in, as opposed to a text that cites this information. Acewolf359 14:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Why were all the references to "Indians" replaced with "Native Americans"? PedanticallySpeaking 14:51, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
Defiance County: The Battle of Fallen Timbers (U.S. victory, 1794) was not "the worst defeat ever suffered by the U.S. Army against the Indians"! Look it up for yourself! Corrected back once again to "St. Clair's Defeat". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.60.185.28 ( talk • contribs)
Howe's text (ref. #6 in article) describes the following etymology in the Geauga county section:
The name Geauga, or Sheauga, signifies, in the Indian language, raccoon: it was originally applied to Grand river; thus, "Sheauga sepe," i.e. Raccoon River.
I have also found Sheauga mentioned in a separate source: the article in the article "ORIGIN OF OHIO PLACE NAMES". Ohio History. 14: 278.
The Grand River was called Sheauga, or "Raccoon," by the Indians, hence, Geauga County;
Any reason this detail shouldn't be mentioned? Wanted to discuss before I edited, since this is a featured list. -- KeithB 18:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
I feel that the term "Indian" in the lead is ambiguous, and assumes an Anglo-American perspective. I note that there has been some flipping back and forth between "Indian" and "Native American" throughout the history of this article. The term "American Indian" would seem an acceptable comprimise, and specifies the meaning of "Indian" throughout the remainder of the article, although perhaps this definition should be stated explicitly in the lead as well? -- KeithB 16:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
The method used to cite references is IMO hard to use and doesn't follow either Harvard referencing or the footnote system. I suggest this article be revised to use the Cite.php footnote system as described in Wikipedia:Footnotes. Colin° Talk 16:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Still working at this. Have a preliminary copy in my sandbox. Thing that bothers me with this method is all the backlinks that are created in the references section. Makes it look cluttered, and isn't really necessary. I have been trying to find a way to suppress the backlinks, if possible. -- KeithB 05:44, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
For my comments about why John Allen should be considered the more reliable origin of the name of Allen County, please see the Discussion page of Allen County, Ohio. Steve Baskauf 03:41, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
In the "analysis of names" section, what criteria was used for sorting "Indian fighters" from "American Revolutionary War soldiers"? Three names are listed in the "Indian fighter" category: Crawford, Hardin, and Wayne. All three of these soldiers fought Indians, but of course they also fought in the American Revolution. Perhaps they were placed in the "Indian fighter" category because they were more famous for fighting Indians in Ohio than for fighting British troops in the Revolution. If so, then Clark and Logan belong in that category too, because they were primarily Indian fighters. Butler and Darke probably belong in the "Indian fighter" category too, because their claim to fame in Ohio (and thus why counties were named after them) rests with their participation in the Northwest Indian War. — Kevin Myers 01:27, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
I think that the information suggesting this county was named for John Quincy Adams is so obviously in error that it should be deleted from the list, and simply mentioned in a note as an apparently erroneous piece of information found in one source. It is not plausible that the county would have been named for the sitting President's 30-year-old son, who was at the time serving as U.S. minister to Prussia. -- Orlady ( talk) 21:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
List of Ohio county name etymologies is a former featured list. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page and why it was removed. If it has improved again to featured list standard, you may renominate the article to become a featured list. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Former featured list |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Under the Columbiana entry, this line occurs:
Howe states "Kilbourn, in his 'Gazeteer,' says: 'Columbiana is a fancy name, taken from the names Columbus and Anna'"
I first thought that this line was gibberish, but after deleting it and having someone re-instate it, I realize it isn't completely meaningless. Someone should change way it is written, perhaps even adding the source that this information ACTUALLY appears in, as opposed to a text that cites this information. Acewolf359 14:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Why were all the references to "Indians" replaced with "Native Americans"? PedanticallySpeaking 14:51, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
Defiance County: The Battle of Fallen Timbers (U.S. victory, 1794) was not "the worst defeat ever suffered by the U.S. Army against the Indians"! Look it up for yourself! Corrected back once again to "St. Clair's Defeat". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.60.185.28 ( talk • contribs)
Howe's text (ref. #6 in article) describes the following etymology in the Geauga county section:
The name Geauga, or Sheauga, signifies, in the Indian language, raccoon: it was originally applied to Grand river; thus, "Sheauga sepe," i.e. Raccoon River.
I have also found Sheauga mentioned in a separate source: the article in the article "ORIGIN OF OHIO PLACE NAMES". Ohio History. 14: 278.
The Grand River was called Sheauga, or "Raccoon," by the Indians, hence, Geauga County;
Any reason this detail shouldn't be mentioned? Wanted to discuss before I edited, since this is a featured list. -- KeithB 18:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
I feel that the term "Indian" in the lead is ambiguous, and assumes an Anglo-American perspective. I note that there has been some flipping back and forth between "Indian" and "Native American" throughout the history of this article. The term "American Indian" would seem an acceptable comprimise, and specifies the meaning of "Indian" throughout the remainder of the article, although perhaps this definition should be stated explicitly in the lead as well? -- KeithB 16:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
The method used to cite references is IMO hard to use and doesn't follow either Harvard referencing or the footnote system. I suggest this article be revised to use the Cite.php footnote system as described in Wikipedia:Footnotes. Colin° Talk 16:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Still working at this. Have a preliminary copy in my sandbox. Thing that bothers me with this method is all the backlinks that are created in the references section. Makes it look cluttered, and isn't really necessary. I have been trying to find a way to suppress the backlinks, if possible. -- KeithB 05:44, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
For my comments about why John Allen should be considered the more reliable origin of the name of Allen County, please see the Discussion page of Allen County, Ohio. Steve Baskauf 03:41, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
In the "analysis of names" section, what criteria was used for sorting "Indian fighters" from "American Revolutionary War soldiers"? Three names are listed in the "Indian fighter" category: Crawford, Hardin, and Wayne. All three of these soldiers fought Indians, but of course they also fought in the American Revolution. Perhaps they were placed in the "Indian fighter" category because they were more famous for fighting Indians in Ohio than for fighting British troops in the Revolution. If so, then Clark and Logan belong in that category too, because they were primarily Indian fighters. Butler and Darke probably belong in the "Indian fighter" category too, because their claim to fame in Ohio (and thus why counties were named after them) rests with their participation in the Northwest Indian War. — Kevin Myers 01:27, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
I think that the information suggesting this county was named for John Quincy Adams is so obviously in error that it should be deleted from the list, and simply mentioned in a note as an apparently erroneous piece of information found in one source. It is not plausible that the county would have been named for the sitting President's 30-year-old son, who was at the time serving as U.S. minister to Prussia. -- Orlady ( talk) 21:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)