This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
awards and
prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the
importance scale.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
List of Muslim Nobel Laureates is a former
featured list candidate. Please view the link under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. Once the objections have been addressed you may
resubmit the article for featured list status.
This article was nominated for
deletion on 15 March 2012 (UTC). The result of
the discussion was no consensus.
Comments
Where are the sources? To claim these people are muslim, without further clarifcation seems to be original research to me. What does Muslim mean here? Religious? Orthodox? Ethnic? Sjiiet? Sunnit? Also, lets just make lists of Transgender Nobel laureats and one of Nobel prize winners with blue eyes, while we're at it? --
Honorsteem (
talk)
19:10, 12 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Ignoring the less-sensible suggestions, Honorsteem raises a very important point. As the endless discussions regarding our
List of Jewish Nobel laureates has indicated, proper sourcing over such matters is essential. And given that Islam is unequivocally a religion,
WP:BLPCAT policy will apply: "Categories regarding religious beliefs... should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief... in question, and the subject's beliefs... are relevant to their public life or notability, according to reliable published sources". Given this requirement, it is possible that the list may be contrary to policy, and require deletion.
AndyTheGrump (
talk)
23:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC)reply
I agree. We can't be sure of the religion of anybody on this list and beyond that, what does it mean to be muslim? When Honorsteem talk about a list of Nobel laureates with blue eyes (I hope nobody actually creates such list), it would be a more objective inclusion criteria. For instance, Orhan Pamuk says that he is a "cultural muslim" (What is a cultural muslim? Who knows?). We should delete this list like we should delete
List of Chinese Nobel laureates,
Nobel laureates of India,
List of Japanese Nobel laureates (which are redundant with the more neutral and more useful list by country) and any other similar list.
Eleventh1 (
talk)
08:01, 28 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Actually, I'd say it is the other way round - the 'similar articles' should comply with policy too. And I don't see how one could source 'from the Muslim community' anyway, without resorting to
synthesis.
AndyTheGrump (
talk)
00:41, 29 February 2012 (UTC)reply
For people notable enough to win Nobel prizes, there are almost always sources stating what - if any - their religious background is. Most of the figures on this page have biographies published about them.
Avaya1 (
talk)
00:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC)reply
I'd imagine that biographic information is available for all Nobel laureates (though it may not say anything about their religion), however, unless their religion is relevant to their notability, it is questionable as to whether this list would meet
WP:BLPCAT, even if sourced. The point is that winning a Nobel laureate is clearly notable, and the Islamic faith likewise, but is the intersection of the two notable? You might like to take a look at
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Jewish_Nobel_laureates, which closed as 'no consensus' in circumstances where the subject matter (Jewish Nobel laureates) had actually been discussed in several scholarly sources. I think to justify this list, you'd have at minimum to find similar sources, discussing 'Muslim Nobel laureates' as a topic.
AndyTheGrump (
talk)
01:10, 29 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Given that you kept the above list, out of consistency I don't see how we can't keep this list. How can we justify having an article for one religion, and not all the others? It's clearly not the most notable article on wikipedia, but there are thousands of less notable articles that you should be nominating for deletion ahead of this one. I think the best thing for this article is to try to get the sources up to scratch, and look at the secondary literature, and then we can discuss it again afterwards.
Avaya1 (
talk)
01:37, 29 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Firstly, 'Jewishness' isn't just a religion (if it was, a significant number of those included on the list wouldn't qualify), it is also an ethnicity: though who is 'Jewish' is often a controversial issue - there are differing criteria. And secondly, each Wikipedia article needs to be assessed on its own merits, rather than by comparison with others. As to whether the 'Jewish laureates' article is merited, this is questionable (and personally, I've argued that it isn't), but it does actually seem to have a bearing on an issue that has been discussed elsewhere - that people of Jewish descent are statistically over-represented amongst Nobel laureates. Again, as to why this is true, there are many theories - that the article in question doesn't do anything other than provide a raw (and contentious) list is a flaw in my opinion, but this is a subject that has been discussed elsewhere. To justify this list, one needs to demonstrate that there is something notable in the intersection between 'Nobel laureates' and 'Muslims' by finding sources that argue the same thing. Are there any? I'm not aware of any real discussion of the issue. While I've no doubt that Muslim Nobel laureates are deserving of their awards, the Nobel committee doesn't take religion into account when awarding prizes - and neither, for that matter, does the long and honourable tradition of Muslim scientific scholarship, which from its origins (which were to a notable extent, the origins of 'science' as we understand it) were concerned with the ideas of scientists as scientists, rather than as Muslims or non-Muslims.
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't really the best argument for the existence of a list that tells us little about the individuals concerned, and nothing whatsoever about Islam.
AndyTheGrump (
talk)
04:36, 3 March 2012 (UTC)reply
Do you have any problems with the source anymore?....
User:Skashifakram(UTC)
The book has its own articles. We allow non-free images of title pages in dedicated articles about a book, but we then don't re-include the image in other pages where the book is merely mentioned as part of a list.
Fut.Perf.☼11:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)reply
I have created a newer version of the file with far lower resolution to avoid strict copyright problem and as a creator of the image, I am using this in the article.--
Skashifakram (
talk)
11:52, 11 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Nope, that won't work either. Still fails NFCC#8: There simply is no need for us to see an image of the book cover in order to understand this list.
Fut.Perf.☼11:55, 11 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Same reason: we don't use non-free images in lists. People who want to know what he looked like can go to his dedicated article. Also, neither of these images had a proper Fair Use Rationale spelled out for this article. (But don't go now and try writing one: it will be futile.)
Fut.Perf.☼12:00, 11 April 2012 (UTC)reply
File:Banker to the poor4.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article,
File:Banker to the poor4.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 11 April 2012
What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review
deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
awards and
prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the
importance scale.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
List of Muslim Nobel Laureates is a former
featured list candidate. Please view the link under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. Once the objections have been addressed you may
resubmit the article for featured list status.
This article was nominated for
deletion on 15 March 2012 (UTC). The result of
the discussion was no consensus.
Comments
Where are the sources? To claim these people are muslim, without further clarifcation seems to be original research to me. What does Muslim mean here? Religious? Orthodox? Ethnic? Sjiiet? Sunnit? Also, lets just make lists of Transgender Nobel laureats and one of Nobel prize winners with blue eyes, while we're at it? --
Honorsteem (
talk)
19:10, 12 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Ignoring the less-sensible suggestions, Honorsteem raises a very important point. As the endless discussions regarding our
List of Jewish Nobel laureates has indicated, proper sourcing over such matters is essential. And given that Islam is unequivocally a religion,
WP:BLPCAT policy will apply: "Categories regarding religious beliefs... should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief... in question, and the subject's beliefs... are relevant to their public life or notability, according to reliable published sources". Given this requirement, it is possible that the list may be contrary to policy, and require deletion.
AndyTheGrump (
talk)
23:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC)reply
I agree. We can't be sure of the religion of anybody on this list and beyond that, what does it mean to be muslim? When Honorsteem talk about a list of Nobel laureates with blue eyes (I hope nobody actually creates such list), it would be a more objective inclusion criteria. For instance, Orhan Pamuk says that he is a "cultural muslim" (What is a cultural muslim? Who knows?). We should delete this list like we should delete
List of Chinese Nobel laureates,
Nobel laureates of India,
List of Japanese Nobel laureates (which are redundant with the more neutral and more useful list by country) and any other similar list.
Eleventh1 (
talk)
08:01, 28 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Actually, I'd say it is the other way round - the 'similar articles' should comply with policy too. And I don't see how one could source 'from the Muslim community' anyway, without resorting to
synthesis.
AndyTheGrump (
talk)
00:41, 29 February 2012 (UTC)reply
For people notable enough to win Nobel prizes, there are almost always sources stating what - if any - their religious background is. Most of the figures on this page have biographies published about them.
Avaya1 (
talk)
00:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC)reply
I'd imagine that biographic information is available for all Nobel laureates (though it may not say anything about their religion), however, unless their religion is relevant to their notability, it is questionable as to whether this list would meet
WP:BLPCAT, even if sourced. The point is that winning a Nobel laureate is clearly notable, and the Islamic faith likewise, but is the intersection of the two notable? You might like to take a look at
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Jewish_Nobel_laureates, which closed as 'no consensus' in circumstances where the subject matter (Jewish Nobel laureates) had actually been discussed in several scholarly sources. I think to justify this list, you'd have at minimum to find similar sources, discussing 'Muslim Nobel laureates' as a topic.
AndyTheGrump (
talk)
01:10, 29 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Given that you kept the above list, out of consistency I don't see how we can't keep this list. How can we justify having an article for one religion, and not all the others? It's clearly not the most notable article on wikipedia, but there are thousands of less notable articles that you should be nominating for deletion ahead of this one. I think the best thing for this article is to try to get the sources up to scratch, and look at the secondary literature, and then we can discuss it again afterwards.
Avaya1 (
talk)
01:37, 29 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Firstly, 'Jewishness' isn't just a religion (if it was, a significant number of those included on the list wouldn't qualify), it is also an ethnicity: though who is 'Jewish' is often a controversial issue - there are differing criteria. And secondly, each Wikipedia article needs to be assessed on its own merits, rather than by comparison with others. As to whether the 'Jewish laureates' article is merited, this is questionable (and personally, I've argued that it isn't), but it does actually seem to have a bearing on an issue that has been discussed elsewhere - that people of Jewish descent are statistically over-represented amongst Nobel laureates. Again, as to why this is true, there are many theories - that the article in question doesn't do anything other than provide a raw (and contentious) list is a flaw in my opinion, but this is a subject that has been discussed elsewhere. To justify this list, one needs to demonstrate that there is something notable in the intersection between 'Nobel laureates' and 'Muslims' by finding sources that argue the same thing. Are there any? I'm not aware of any real discussion of the issue. While I've no doubt that Muslim Nobel laureates are deserving of their awards, the Nobel committee doesn't take religion into account when awarding prizes - and neither, for that matter, does the long and honourable tradition of Muslim scientific scholarship, which from its origins (which were to a notable extent, the origins of 'science' as we understand it) were concerned with the ideas of scientists as scientists, rather than as Muslims or non-Muslims.
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't really the best argument for the existence of a list that tells us little about the individuals concerned, and nothing whatsoever about Islam.
AndyTheGrump (
talk)
04:36, 3 March 2012 (UTC)reply
Do you have any problems with the source anymore?....
User:Skashifakram(UTC)
The book has its own articles. We allow non-free images of title pages in dedicated articles about a book, but we then don't re-include the image in other pages where the book is merely mentioned as part of a list.
Fut.Perf.☼11:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)reply
I have created a newer version of the file with far lower resolution to avoid strict copyright problem and as a creator of the image, I am using this in the article.--
Skashifakram (
talk)
11:52, 11 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Nope, that won't work either. Still fails NFCC#8: There simply is no need for us to see an image of the book cover in order to understand this list.
Fut.Perf.☼11:55, 11 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Same reason: we don't use non-free images in lists. People who want to know what he looked like can go to his dedicated article. Also, neither of these images had a proper Fair Use Rationale spelled out for this article. (But don't go now and try writing one: it will be futile.)
Fut.Perf.☼12:00, 11 April 2012 (UTC)reply
File:Banker to the poor4.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article,
File:Banker to the poor4.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 11 April 2012
What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review
deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.