This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and contribute to the
discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is
not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
Support This page was originally at Korean Canadian until a few days ago, when it was moved (undiscussed) along with a bunch of other xyz Canadian pages on the very weak grounds, apparently the opinion of a single user, that the term "Korean Canadian" allegedly excludes people of partial Korean descent (IMO this idea is untrue). Korean Canadian is the
common name as well as the self-identifying name of the group in question. This page should be moved back to where it originally was unless there's a better justification.
cab15:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Support. Seems to be part of a larger issue involving (at the very least) all the pages at {{Canadians of Asian descents}} (which was also moved). Looks like a lot of undiscussed edits by
User:Mayumashu, who may be unaware of, or opposed to, wider Wikipedia conventions?
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories)#Heritage recommends the same style as the proposed move, and I'd say the individual article should match the eponymous category. Looks like a lot of reverting if this goes through. Maybe all the pages should have been nominated together? --
DeLarge09:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Survey - in opposition to the move
Discussion
Add any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 19 April 2017
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and contribute to the
discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is
not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
Support This page was originally at Korean Canadian until a few days ago, when it was moved (undiscussed) along with a bunch of other xyz Canadian pages on the very weak grounds, apparently the opinion of a single user, that the term "Korean Canadian" allegedly excludes people of partial Korean descent (IMO this idea is untrue). Korean Canadian is the
common name as well as the self-identifying name of the group in question. This page should be moved back to where it originally was unless there's a better justification.
cab15:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Support. Seems to be part of a larger issue involving (at the very least) all the pages at {{Canadians of Asian descents}} (which was also moved). Looks like a lot of undiscussed edits by
User:Mayumashu, who may be unaware of, or opposed to, wider Wikipedia conventions?
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories)#Heritage recommends the same style as the proposed move, and I'd say the individual article should match the eponymous category. Looks like a lot of reverting if this goes through. Maybe all the pages should have been nominated together? --
DeLarge09:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Survey - in opposition to the move
Discussion
Add any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 19 April 2017
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.