This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of Indian states and union territories by GDP per capita article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Parts of this article (those related to documentation) need to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. (February 2022) |
The data in this article is now outdated and, more importantly, is missing a state (Jharkhand) entirely! I am going to replace the table with the one from this source. Diffeomorphicvoodoo ( talk) 23:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Sorting of data is not working correctly and I can assist if someone can let me know what need to be fixed. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.200.148.116 ( talk) 19:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Indian states and union territories by GDP per capita. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:27, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
I find it strange that HP has more per capita income than chandigarh Ankur Bhandari ( talk) 01:35, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
it was wrong but it's made correct now Indian punjabi ( talk) 07:52, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
This article mentions values of per capita net state domestic product (NSDP) of all states and UTs of India and not per capita GSDP. Most Indian state governments release and submit to the central government ministry, MOSPI only per capita NSDP figures as "per capita income" and not per capita GSDP. A few users have been repeatedly adding per capita GSDP of West Bengal which is obviously higher than it's per capita NSDP and inflates it's ranking in this list. Since per capita GSDP figures are available only for a very few states while we have per capita NSDP figures for each and every state and UT which are also currently being used in this list article, it won't be problematic to keep only per capita NSDP figures for all states and reflect the same in the article's lead section and list columns. A name change of the article can also be done. Right now, I'm just changing GRDP to NSDP in lead section and GDP column. The values currently being mentioned, as I already stated are anyways for per capita NSDP only. They don't require any change. Vibhss ( talk) 21:31, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
There needs to be a map of GDP per capita in US$, which is the global standard. It is impossible for any non-Indian to understand what SGDP per capita in INR means since they have no reference point. Abh9850 ( talk) 16:51, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
I will but who has the final say on this? Seems quite random Abh9850 ( talk) 17:17, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
why is NSDP being used when the page itself is called GDP per capita? extremely misleading, don't you all think. Specially when we have data based on GSDP per capita available on all the state government pages.
Abh9850 (
talk) 23:01, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
all the conversion rates and comparable countries are based on GDP per capita, using NSDP per capita just fudges the data. With a little bit of effort, it's possible to find GSDP per capita figures for all states. I think this is certainly the preferred outcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abh9850 ( talk • contribs) 23:16, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Can someone tell me why there is so many NA in 2020 list??. I mean why so many govts didn't give their data?. Sdc5671 ( talk) 20:19, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
The Indian format of 1,00,000 is breaking the table sorting. When you attempt to sort from largest to smallest, it does not work. The numbers should be updated to a standard western format of 100,000 to allow better sorting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7000:2F40:E900:E4B0:F44A:EDE4:8222 ( talk) 09:18, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please update GDP per capita figures for (2020-21) as per Source [1] (Reserve Bank of India, Government of India). Remember remove old/poor quality sources and add the new source which I have provided. Check Page no 37. Thanks-- 115.98.91.244 ( talk) 09:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template. There is no indication that the proposed source is any different from the current sources and no indication why the proposed source should be necessarily better than the Ministry of Statistics.
Eggishorn
(talk)
(contrib) 07:26, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
The last column in the first table, entitled 'Indian states and union territories by NSDP per capita', compares Goa's NDSP to Croatia's, and other Indian states to other countries. In the last column, it lists countries whose 2019 NDSP per capita is supposedly comparable with the Indian state in column one of the same row. The last column is entirely unsourced, and I have removed it. The last column was sourced in the past, but the sources did not verify the content.
Here's the story: the table column labeled "IMF Estimated equivalent countries" was first introduced in April 2018 with no sourcing under the label "Comparable country", comparing 'Goa' with 'Azerbaijan', and all the other Indian states with some other country. It has gone through numerous changes since then, the column has been removed and readded, sometimes with a different header (e.g., 'Comparable country (Not adjusted for PPP)' in August 2018 (Goa :: Bulgaria); 'Comparable country by GDP per capita (PPP)' in August 2018; 'Comparable Country (PPP)' in December 2018). By September 2019 it was 'Comparable country by GDP per capita (PPP)', still unsourced (still Goa :: Bulgaria). The article underwent a lot of sockpuppetry and edit warring, which necessitated semi-protection ( here and here), and which also affected this column with IPs removing the column numerous times, and regular editors fighting back valiantly against socks, restoring it again (e.g.: 1, 2, 3) ending up with a high, 20.7% revert rate.
By June 2021, the column header was 'IMF Estimated equivalent countries (Nominal) (2021 ₹)' and Goa was compared to 'Belarus'. The column was sourced (possibly for the first time?) in the next edit, citing the IMF World Economic Outlook Database in note 4. However, that IMF source does not mention Goa. In the last version of the article, the col. header is 'Comparable Country (2019 PPP Values)', Goa is compared with Croatia, and the column citation to IMF is gone again.
I have removed the "comparable country" column, because it fails verifiability, and even when it was sourced, the sourcing either did not verify the comparison, or it was invalid original research. I am issuing a formal challenge: do not add or restore "comparable country" data from the IMF (or from any other source) unless the source directly supports the claim; specifically, that it compares the NSDP of an Indian state to a country. Using "Goa" as an example: if the source says that Goan SDP is comparable to the NDP of Croatia (or any other country) then you can add it; if it doesn't, you cannot. Combining data from two sources to establish the comparison is synthesis of published material, and is contrary to the policy of WP:No original research. Thanks, Mathglot ( talk) 02:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
|
103.241.225.83 (
talk) 14:16, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
NITI aayog and often other governmental agencies classify states into two: small and larger state. Ranking smaller states as top in GDP per capita makes no sense. States like Goa and Sikkim are only the size of a district. ChandlerMinh ( talk) 22:31, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1942055 Ppavan1 ( talk) 20:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please update the latest figures of gdp per capita 2022-23. New figures are released by the government of India. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1942055 Smasher Lodhi ( talk) 19:59, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Press Information Bureau has released the per capita NSDP data for 2020-21, 2021-22, and 2022-23. Please update the List and Past NSDP per capita of Indian states sections. Happy to update it myself, if allowed.
Source: https://pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1942055 Peedeeff ( talk) 18:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
The cost of living is extremely different across states in India. This is kinda like saying renting in Kerala would cost the same as renting in Delhi ... 213.205.77.66 ( talk) 01:35, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of Indian states and union territories by GDP per capita article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Parts of this article (those related to documentation) need to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. (February 2022) |
The data in this article is now outdated and, more importantly, is missing a state (Jharkhand) entirely! I am going to replace the table with the one from this source. Diffeomorphicvoodoo ( talk) 23:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Sorting of data is not working correctly and I can assist if someone can let me know what need to be fixed. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.200.148.116 ( talk) 19:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Indian states and union territories by GDP per capita. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:27, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
I find it strange that HP has more per capita income than chandigarh Ankur Bhandari ( talk) 01:35, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
it was wrong but it's made correct now Indian punjabi ( talk) 07:52, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
This article mentions values of per capita net state domestic product (NSDP) of all states and UTs of India and not per capita GSDP. Most Indian state governments release and submit to the central government ministry, MOSPI only per capita NSDP figures as "per capita income" and not per capita GSDP. A few users have been repeatedly adding per capita GSDP of West Bengal which is obviously higher than it's per capita NSDP and inflates it's ranking in this list. Since per capita GSDP figures are available only for a very few states while we have per capita NSDP figures for each and every state and UT which are also currently being used in this list article, it won't be problematic to keep only per capita NSDP figures for all states and reflect the same in the article's lead section and list columns. A name change of the article can also be done. Right now, I'm just changing GRDP to NSDP in lead section and GDP column. The values currently being mentioned, as I already stated are anyways for per capita NSDP only. They don't require any change. Vibhss ( talk) 21:31, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
There needs to be a map of GDP per capita in US$, which is the global standard. It is impossible for any non-Indian to understand what SGDP per capita in INR means since they have no reference point. Abh9850 ( talk) 16:51, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
I will but who has the final say on this? Seems quite random Abh9850 ( talk) 17:17, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
why is NSDP being used when the page itself is called GDP per capita? extremely misleading, don't you all think. Specially when we have data based on GSDP per capita available on all the state government pages.
Abh9850 (
talk) 23:01, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
all the conversion rates and comparable countries are based on GDP per capita, using NSDP per capita just fudges the data. With a little bit of effort, it's possible to find GSDP per capita figures for all states. I think this is certainly the preferred outcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abh9850 ( talk • contribs) 23:16, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Can someone tell me why there is so many NA in 2020 list??. I mean why so many govts didn't give their data?. Sdc5671 ( talk) 20:19, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
The Indian format of 1,00,000 is breaking the table sorting. When you attempt to sort from largest to smallest, it does not work. The numbers should be updated to a standard western format of 100,000 to allow better sorting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7000:2F40:E900:E4B0:F44A:EDE4:8222 ( talk) 09:18, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please update GDP per capita figures for (2020-21) as per Source [1] (Reserve Bank of India, Government of India). Remember remove old/poor quality sources and add the new source which I have provided. Check Page no 37. Thanks-- 115.98.91.244 ( talk) 09:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template. There is no indication that the proposed source is any different from the current sources and no indication why the proposed source should be necessarily better than the Ministry of Statistics.
Eggishorn
(talk)
(contrib) 07:26, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
The last column in the first table, entitled 'Indian states and union territories by NSDP per capita', compares Goa's NDSP to Croatia's, and other Indian states to other countries. In the last column, it lists countries whose 2019 NDSP per capita is supposedly comparable with the Indian state in column one of the same row. The last column is entirely unsourced, and I have removed it. The last column was sourced in the past, but the sources did not verify the content.
Here's the story: the table column labeled "IMF Estimated equivalent countries" was first introduced in April 2018 with no sourcing under the label "Comparable country", comparing 'Goa' with 'Azerbaijan', and all the other Indian states with some other country. It has gone through numerous changes since then, the column has been removed and readded, sometimes with a different header (e.g., 'Comparable country (Not adjusted for PPP)' in August 2018 (Goa :: Bulgaria); 'Comparable country by GDP per capita (PPP)' in August 2018; 'Comparable Country (PPP)' in December 2018). By September 2019 it was 'Comparable country by GDP per capita (PPP)', still unsourced (still Goa :: Bulgaria). The article underwent a lot of sockpuppetry and edit warring, which necessitated semi-protection ( here and here), and which also affected this column with IPs removing the column numerous times, and regular editors fighting back valiantly against socks, restoring it again (e.g.: 1, 2, 3) ending up with a high, 20.7% revert rate.
By June 2021, the column header was 'IMF Estimated equivalent countries (Nominal) (2021 ₹)' and Goa was compared to 'Belarus'. The column was sourced (possibly for the first time?) in the next edit, citing the IMF World Economic Outlook Database in note 4. However, that IMF source does not mention Goa. In the last version of the article, the col. header is 'Comparable Country (2019 PPP Values)', Goa is compared with Croatia, and the column citation to IMF is gone again.
I have removed the "comparable country" column, because it fails verifiability, and even when it was sourced, the sourcing either did not verify the comparison, or it was invalid original research. I am issuing a formal challenge: do not add or restore "comparable country" data from the IMF (or from any other source) unless the source directly supports the claim; specifically, that it compares the NSDP of an Indian state to a country. Using "Goa" as an example: if the source says that Goan SDP is comparable to the NDP of Croatia (or any other country) then you can add it; if it doesn't, you cannot. Combining data from two sources to establish the comparison is synthesis of published material, and is contrary to the policy of WP:No original research. Thanks, Mathglot ( talk) 02:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
|
103.241.225.83 (
talk) 14:16, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
NITI aayog and often other governmental agencies classify states into two: small and larger state. Ranking smaller states as top in GDP per capita makes no sense. States like Goa and Sikkim are only the size of a district. ChandlerMinh ( talk) 22:31, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1942055 Ppavan1 ( talk) 20:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please update the latest figures of gdp per capita 2022-23. New figures are released by the government of India. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1942055 Smasher Lodhi ( talk) 19:59, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Press Information Bureau has released the per capita NSDP data for 2020-21, 2021-22, and 2022-23. Please update the List and Past NSDP per capita of Indian states sections. Happy to update it myself, if allowed.
Source: https://pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1942055 Peedeeff ( talk) 18:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
The cost of living is extremely different across states in India. This is kinda like saying renting in Kerala would cost the same as renting in Delhi ... 213.205.77.66 ( talk) 01:35, 29 December 2023 (UTC)