This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This edit by Beland ( talk · contribs) added an {{ update}} request to the article, but without details as to what was out-of-date, the template is worthless. I am removing the template, but welcome its restoration as long as the talk page identifies what the issues are. 72.244.200.34 ( talk) 06:37, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
I have restored the out of date tag. The problem is that the dates in these tables are well out of date (and possibly the spike info). I just spent a bunch of time updating Template:Geologic time scale, following the most up-to-date ICS timescale - Gradstein and Ogg's Geologic Time Scale 2012, as seen now on their site: [1]. That appears to also be the most up-to-date source for what is currently golden-spiked.
Incidentally, and in addition, this article doesn't actually make clear what the ones tagged with the golden spikes mean, which is really compromising the article. DanHobley ( talk) 16:41, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
The way the table is organized now is a little problematic. A novice reader might think that the Cambrian is the period between Stage 10 and the Tremadocian. I think we have to think of a better way to do this. Maybe the more standard first column rowspaned over the whole Cambrian. -- Tobias1984 ( talk) 06:51, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
When making links to the list, to my limited knowledge, it is not possible to be more specific that #List. This list however is huge and it may take a substantial amount of scrowling and searching to find what you are looking for. Perhaps there is a solution. I wouldn't mind if the table was split up per period, but I note that all tables were merged before, probably for good reason. Dwergenpaartje ( talk) 09:05, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on List of Global Boundary Stratotype Sections and Points. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:06, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This edit by Beland ( talk · contribs) added an {{ update}} request to the article, but without details as to what was out-of-date, the template is worthless. I am removing the template, but welcome its restoration as long as the talk page identifies what the issues are. 72.244.200.34 ( talk) 06:37, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
I have restored the out of date tag. The problem is that the dates in these tables are well out of date (and possibly the spike info). I just spent a bunch of time updating Template:Geologic time scale, following the most up-to-date ICS timescale - Gradstein and Ogg's Geologic Time Scale 2012, as seen now on their site: [1]. That appears to also be the most up-to-date source for what is currently golden-spiked.
Incidentally, and in addition, this article doesn't actually make clear what the ones tagged with the golden spikes mean, which is really compromising the article. DanHobley ( talk) 16:41, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
The way the table is organized now is a little problematic. A novice reader might think that the Cambrian is the period between Stage 10 and the Tremadocian. I think we have to think of a better way to do this. Maybe the more standard first column rowspaned over the whole Cambrian. -- Tobias1984 ( talk) 06:51, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
When making links to the list, to my limited knowledge, it is not possible to be more specific that #List. This list however is huge and it may take a substantial amount of scrowling and searching to find what you are looking for. Perhaps there is a solution. I wouldn't mind if the table was split up per period, but I note that all tables were merged before, probably for good reason. Dwergenpaartje ( talk) 09:05, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on List of Global Boundary Stratotype Sections and Points. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:06, 18 May 2017 (UTC)