This article is part of WikiProject Deaf, the WikiProject which seeks to improve articles relating to all aspects of
deaf-related and
Deaf culture. For the Project guidelines, see the
project page or
talk page.DeafWikipedia:WikiProject DeafTemplate:WikiProject Deafdeaf articles
List of Deaf films is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
@
Noldeify143: The "See also" section is supposed to be limited to a reasonable number of links per
WP:SEEALSO. There are too many in the section. Prose can be used, with key examples of non-Deaf films, to discuss the general matter of most films having deaf elements not meeting the criteria. Also, I don't understand why you restored some films that do not meet Deaf cinema criteria? A film like Take Shelter does not meet the criteria, and that was among those that I removed. Lastly, please remember that we need to use reliable sources to write content on Wikipedia. We cannot write something that has not been reputably published elsewhere. For example, what is the sourcing for Deaf cinema criteria? In general, it makes sense, but it needs to be backed. We as Wikipedia editors have to summarize what has been written elsewhere. We can't create new content.
Erik (
talk |
contrib) (
ping me)16:57, 11 December 2017 (UTC)reply
This article is part of WikiProject Deaf, the WikiProject which seeks to improve articles relating to all aspects of
deaf-related and
Deaf culture. For the Project guidelines, see the
project page or
talk page.DeafWikipedia:WikiProject DeafTemplate:WikiProject Deafdeaf articles
List of Deaf films is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
@
Noldeify143: The "See also" section is supposed to be limited to a reasonable number of links per
WP:SEEALSO. There are too many in the section. Prose can be used, with key examples of non-Deaf films, to discuss the general matter of most films having deaf elements not meeting the criteria. Also, I don't understand why you restored some films that do not meet Deaf cinema criteria? A film like Take Shelter does not meet the criteria, and that was among those that I removed. Lastly, please remember that we need to use reliable sources to write content on Wikipedia. We cannot write something that has not been reputably published elsewhere. For example, what is the sourcing for Deaf cinema criteria? In general, it makes sense, but it needs to be backed. We as Wikipedia editors have to summarize what has been written elsewhere. We can't create new content.
Erik (
talk |
contrib) (
ping me)16:57, 11 December 2017 (UTC)reply