![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
This article has a merge template but there is no merge discussion on the target talk page. IMO a merge wouldn't make sense either since they're two separate product lines. Remove the merge template?-- 88.73.39.49 ( talk) 10:13, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
The terminology used to describe Cores (Clusters) and Modules (Cores) is wrong. [AMD lists Bulldozer/FX series as| http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/processors/amdfx/Pages/amdfx-key-architectural-features.aspx] having 2 Cores per Modules, so they come in 8 Core/4 More 6/3 4/2 configurations. WinampLlama ( talk) 04:21, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
AMD claims TDP of FX-8120 is 125W not 95W... or I'm missing something? http://www.amd.com/uk/products/desktop/processors/amdfx/Pages/amdfx-model-number-comparison.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.254.154.251 ( talk) 21:12, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Leaked reports having them coming out in the first part of 2012 but that never happened. I cannot find any other information about these unreleased models. I purpose we remove them from the list since it is rumored info now pushing a year old. Castaa ( talk) 7 Oct 2012 (UTC)
These were announced 6/11/13, not released. I don't think there is any release date set. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.250.141.172 ( talk) 18:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
"All AMD FX microprocessors are unlocked and overclockable." is placed under the category of "Zambezi" processors, making it unclear whether it refers to just the "Zambezi" processors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.51.17.12 ( talk) 18:42, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
The FX APUs aren't listed here, and they are FX microprocessors as well as AMD APUs. They're the FX-7500 and the FX-7600p. Onstrike ( talk) 20:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Athlon FX and Phenom FX not included?
Why is it necessary to include voltage levels for the clock values? I say it is unnecessary, and makes reading the tables more difficult. Opinions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csdani84 ( talk • contribs) 21:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of AMD FX microprocessors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:40, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
There was a redundant and confusing threads/cores/modules presentation.
The number of modules alone does not tell anything.
What is important to note is that the number of modules is equal to the number of FPUs.
It is also relevant to show that the number of cores is equal to the number of threads. 217.162.74.13 ( talk) 15:32, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
217.162.74.13 ( talk) 16:54, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Why are there no release dates posted for each CPU — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.117.125.159 ( talk) 07:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
This article has a merge template but there is no merge discussion on the target talk page. IMO a merge wouldn't make sense either since they're two separate product lines. Remove the merge template?-- 88.73.39.49 ( talk) 10:13, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
The terminology used to describe Cores (Clusters) and Modules (Cores) is wrong. [AMD lists Bulldozer/FX series as| http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/processors/amdfx/Pages/amdfx-key-architectural-features.aspx] having 2 Cores per Modules, so they come in 8 Core/4 More 6/3 4/2 configurations. WinampLlama ( talk) 04:21, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
AMD claims TDP of FX-8120 is 125W not 95W... or I'm missing something? http://www.amd.com/uk/products/desktop/processors/amdfx/Pages/amdfx-model-number-comparison.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.254.154.251 ( talk) 21:12, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Leaked reports having them coming out in the first part of 2012 but that never happened. I cannot find any other information about these unreleased models. I purpose we remove them from the list since it is rumored info now pushing a year old. Castaa ( talk) 7 Oct 2012 (UTC)
These were announced 6/11/13, not released. I don't think there is any release date set. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.250.141.172 ( talk) 18:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
"All AMD FX microprocessors are unlocked and overclockable." is placed under the category of "Zambezi" processors, making it unclear whether it refers to just the "Zambezi" processors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.51.17.12 ( talk) 18:42, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
The FX APUs aren't listed here, and they are FX microprocessors as well as AMD APUs. They're the FX-7500 and the FX-7600p. Onstrike ( talk) 20:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Athlon FX and Phenom FX not included?
Why is it necessary to include voltage levels for the clock values? I say it is unnecessary, and makes reading the tables more difficult. Opinions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csdani84 ( talk • contribs) 21:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of AMD FX microprocessors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:40, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
There was a redundant and confusing threads/cores/modules presentation.
The number of modules alone does not tell anything.
What is important to note is that the number of modules is equal to the number of FPUs.
It is also relevant to show that the number of cores is equal to the number of threads. 217.162.74.13 ( talk) 15:32, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
217.162.74.13 ( talk) 16:54, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Why are there no release dates posted for each CPU — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.117.125.159 ( talk) 07:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)