![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on null. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
I don't understand how anybody could mistake Conwy for a concentric castle. Is it really "often cited" as such? Lordjim13 16:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Also, there are quite a few linear Crusader castles that are better examples than Krak (which is an almost perfect concentric castle). Margat, for example. Lordjim13 16:13, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
What more needs to be said? The definition is completely wrong and has little utility therefore, as a encyclopedic article. As a bonus there are no citations in the article. CJ DUB 13:03, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
The editor, CJ DUB, is a troll who does nothing but denigrate the works of others, while never contributing anything of note themselves. They are deletist in manner and thought. I have found this out attempting to improve the various castle articles in an honest and open manner. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.132.218.238 ( talk) 13:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
There are no references, so the term "linear castle" looks dubious. Perhaps a better article would be " spur castle", as that is a widely used term with many examples.
The only author who uses the term "linear castle is Alan Titchmarsh in some tourism book. Perspicaris ( talk) 13:42, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Linear castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on null. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
I don't understand how anybody could mistake Conwy for a concentric castle. Is it really "often cited" as such? Lordjim13 16:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Also, there are quite a few linear Crusader castles that are better examples than Krak (which is an almost perfect concentric castle). Margat, for example. Lordjim13 16:13, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
What more needs to be said? The definition is completely wrong and has little utility therefore, as a encyclopedic article. As a bonus there are no citations in the article. CJ DUB 13:03, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
The editor, CJ DUB, is a troll who does nothing but denigrate the works of others, while never contributing anything of note themselves. They are deletist in manner and thought. I have found this out attempting to improve the various castle articles in an honest and open manner. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.132.218.238 ( talk) 13:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
There are no references, so the term "linear castle" looks dubious. Perhaps a better article would be " spur castle", as that is a widely used term with many examples.
The only author who uses the term "linear castle is Alan Titchmarsh in some tourism book. Perspicaris ( talk) 13:42, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Linear castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)