![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 10 July 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Fanta Pineapple and Grapefruit to Lilt. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Does this page meet notability guidelines??
I think so. It's a major drink, such as coke or fanta, albeit not quite as influential. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.21.197.156 ( talk) 18:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Apparently, it kills sperm...
Has this been proven? Does the info merit inclusion in this article? I think so... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.41.169.131 ( talk) 19:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Lilt was available in the UK long before 1996. Why are there two dates - 1996 & 1975? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.173.75.235 ( talk) 09:53, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
This article talk page was automatically added with {{ WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot ( talk) 23:06, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Do Mandarin and Mango or Banana and Peach still exist? I've not seen them for a very long time. 92.2.177.34 ( talk) 20:21, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Why does Lilt disambiguation link directly to this? Ptomblin ( talk) 16:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
"Its USA Counterpart is Mountain Dew."
Sounds dubious to me, is this just personal opinion? They sold Mountain Dew in the UK a few years back before it was withdrawn- unless our version was very different to the US one, then I'm sceptical, since they tasted and looked quite different. On second thoughts, given how questionable this is, I'm removing it altogether. Ubcule ( talk) 23:07, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
there's a page on the coca cola website dedicate to this brand with all the 'nutritional/ information http://www.coca-cola.co.uk/brands/lilt.html I can never remember how to adit references! Adagio67 ( talk) 10:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
The file File:Soft Drink.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at File:Soft Drink.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days. Commons fair use upload bot ( talk) 21:17, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lilt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:22, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Between 2008 and 2014, The Coca-Cola Company reduced the number of calories in the drink by 56% as part of its efforts to make healthier products in response to the British Government's Public Health Responsibility Deal.[2] The amount of sugar was also reduced alongside the addition of artificial sweeteners (aspartame, acesulfame K and saccharin). Maybe this should be changed to 'Since 2008' or a more specific year? As it could seem to imply that ingredient change was only until 2014 depending on how you read it. Incidentally some sources on the internet say the Lilt recipe change was around 2003 which would be even earlier than this. Sorry to link a tabloid! https://www.thesun.co.uk/money/5988229/new-sugar-tax-uk-fizzy-drinks-soft-drinks/#:~:text=While%20Lilt%2C%20which%20changed%20its,has%20avoided%20the%20tax%20entirely.
AF1990 ( talk) 16:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Main picture should show front of bottle not back of label Toonsip ( talk) 01:28, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Shouldn't this article remain at Lilt, given it is about the former brand, rather than the current Fanta variety? Gatepainter ( talk) 21:46, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus clearly favors the previous title of Lilt being retained, as the article nearly only focuses on the brand. There is also a rough consensus that new content on the drink after the rebrand should primarily either go in Fanta, or if independently notable, a new article on the Fanta Pineapple and Grapefruit that is separate from this one. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 15:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Fanta Pineapple and Grapefruit → Lilt – The original name of this article was Lilt and was changed without any prior discussion by a Wikipedia user to Fanta Pineapple and Grapefruit on 2 July 2023. The reason for the change was that the Lilt brand had been discontinued and the recipe had become one of the flavours of the existing Fanta brand. The entire content of the article relates to the former Lilt brand, and the history section ends with the brand being discontinued and subsumed into the Fanta brand. I propose that the original name of the article be reinstated, and any material relating to the new Fanta flavour be included on the Fanta page. Individual flavours of the Fanta drink do not merit separate Wikipedia articles, whereas a standalone brand such as Lilt ought to have its own article. A person looking for information on the discontinued brand would look for Lilt, rather than Fanta Pineapple and Grapefruit. Gatepainter ( talk) 15:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Fanta Pineapple and Grapefruit has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 17 § Fanta Pineapple and Grapefruit until a consensus is reached.
Skarmory
(talk •
contribs)
15:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
What kind of claim is this? Is it relevant in any way? Should there be a list over countries in which Lilit never has been sold? 2001:9B1:8826:0:98:128:186:71 ( talk) 15:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 10 July 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Fanta Pineapple and Grapefruit to Lilt. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Does this page meet notability guidelines??
I think so. It's a major drink, such as coke or fanta, albeit not quite as influential. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.21.197.156 ( talk) 18:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Apparently, it kills sperm...
Has this been proven? Does the info merit inclusion in this article? I think so... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.41.169.131 ( talk) 19:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Lilt was available in the UK long before 1996. Why are there two dates - 1996 & 1975? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.173.75.235 ( talk) 09:53, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
This article talk page was automatically added with {{ WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot ( talk) 23:06, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Do Mandarin and Mango or Banana and Peach still exist? I've not seen them for a very long time. 92.2.177.34 ( talk) 20:21, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Why does Lilt disambiguation link directly to this? Ptomblin ( talk) 16:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
"Its USA Counterpart is Mountain Dew."
Sounds dubious to me, is this just personal opinion? They sold Mountain Dew in the UK a few years back before it was withdrawn- unless our version was very different to the US one, then I'm sceptical, since they tasted and looked quite different. On second thoughts, given how questionable this is, I'm removing it altogether. Ubcule ( talk) 23:07, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
there's a page on the coca cola website dedicate to this brand with all the 'nutritional/ information http://www.coca-cola.co.uk/brands/lilt.html I can never remember how to adit references! Adagio67 ( talk) 10:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
The file File:Soft Drink.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at File:Soft Drink.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days. Commons fair use upload bot ( talk) 21:17, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lilt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:22, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Between 2008 and 2014, The Coca-Cola Company reduced the number of calories in the drink by 56% as part of its efforts to make healthier products in response to the British Government's Public Health Responsibility Deal.[2] The amount of sugar was also reduced alongside the addition of artificial sweeteners (aspartame, acesulfame K and saccharin). Maybe this should be changed to 'Since 2008' or a more specific year? As it could seem to imply that ingredient change was only until 2014 depending on how you read it. Incidentally some sources on the internet say the Lilt recipe change was around 2003 which would be even earlier than this. Sorry to link a tabloid! https://www.thesun.co.uk/money/5988229/new-sugar-tax-uk-fizzy-drinks-soft-drinks/#:~:text=While%20Lilt%2C%20which%20changed%20its,has%20avoided%20the%20tax%20entirely.
AF1990 ( talk) 16:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Main picture should show front of bottle not back of label Toonsip ( talk) 01:28, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Shouldn't this article remain at Lilt, given it is about the former brand, rather than the current Fanta variety? Gatepainter ( talk) 21:46, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus clearly favors the previous title of Lilt being retained, as the article nearly only focuses on the brand. There is also a rough consensus that new content on the drink after the rebrand should primarily either go in Fanta, or if independently notable, a new article on the Fanta Pineapple and Grapefruit that is separate from this one. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 15:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Fanta Pineapple and Grapefruit → Lilt – The original name of this article was Lilt and was changed without any prior discussion by a Wikipedia user to Fanta Pineapple and Grapefruit on 2 July 2023. The reason for the change was that the Lilt brand had been discontinued and the recipe had become one of the flavours of the existing Fanta brand. The entire content of the article relates to the former Lilt brand, and the history section ends with the brand being discontinued and subsumed into the Fanta brand. I propose that the original name of the article be reinstated, and any material relating to the new Fanta flavour be included on the Fanta page. Individual flavours of the Fanta drink do not merit separate Wikipedia articles, whereas a standalone brand such as Lilt ought to have its own article. A person looking for information on the discontinued brand would look for Lilt, rather than Fanta Pineapple and Grapefruit. Gatepainter ( talk) 15:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Fanta Pineapple and Grapefruit has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 17 § Fanta Pineapple and Grapefruit until a consensus is reached.
Skarmory
(talk •
contribs)
15:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
What kind of claim is this? Is it relevant in any way? Should there be a list over countries in which Lilit never has been sold? 2001:9B1:8826:0:98:128:186:71 ( talk) 15:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC)