This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
From the article, it does not become clear whether the Liesegang rings are in fact really rings or just layers. If a layer is formed in a test tube, it looks like a ring. If a similar experiment is performed in a wide container or cup, would you really see rings or just thin layers?
That seems like an important difference to me. Johan Lont 11:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
The ending of the article appear to be biased in favour of pushing the IDNB model as a scientifically accepted fact. Is this apparent to anyone else? Tubafil ( talk) 21:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Some textbooks state that Liesegang's experiments used potassium chromate, not dichromate [1]. Longitude2 ( talk) 14:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
From the article, it does not become clear whether the Liesegang rings are in fact really rings or just layers. If a layer is formed in a test tube, it looks like a ring. If a similar experiment is performed in a wide container or cup, would you really see rings or just thin layers?
That seems like an important difference to me. Johan Lont 11:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
The ending of the article appear to be biased in favour of pushing the IDNB model as a scientifically accepted fact. Is this apparent to anyone else? Tubafil ( talk) 21:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Some textbooks state that Liesegang's experiments used potassium chromate, not dichromate [1]. Longitude2 ( talk) 14:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC)