![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
At least according to the Library of Congress catalog online.
Any sources for this article?? Moncrief 16:20, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Unfortunately, for us to have a listing of the Dewey Decimal Classification, the Chinese Library Classification, the Nippon Decimal Classification, and the Colon Classification system, and not to have a complete listing of the classification system of the single greatest library in the United States of America (and possibly the world) is a little unfair. LOC Classification is used in a great number of college and research libraries, and I think giving a full account of the system--with links--is worthy of an article. Granted the articles I've created aren't wikified, but I like to get the lists up first before completely linking them. If you want to avoid , we can put the entire classification on one page, but it would be inordinately long. NielsenGW 06:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
The pages for the Schedule B and all of its subpages was deleted on April 4. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Library of Congress Classification:Class B, subclass BS -- The Bible. I have started a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Library of Congress Classification:Class B, subclass BS -- The Bible about how to deal with this. DGG 04:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
At least according to the Library of Congress catalog online.
Any sources for this article?? Moncrief 16:20, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Unfortunately, for us to have a listing of the Dewey Decimal Classification, the Chinese Library Classification, the Nippon Decimal Classification, and the Colon Classification system, and not to have a complete listing of the classification system of the single greatest library in the United States of America (and possibly the world) is a little unfair. LOC Classification is used in a great number of college and research libraries, and I think giving a full account of the system--with links--is worthy of an article. Granted the articles I've created aren't wikified, but I like to get the lists up first before completely linking them. If you want to avoid , we can put the entire classification on one page, but it would be inordinately long. NielsenGW 06:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
The pages for the Schedule B and all of its subpages was deleted on April 4. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Library of Congress Classification:Class B, subclass BS -- The Bible. I have started a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Library of Congress Classification:Class B, subclass BS -- The Bible about how to deal with this. DGG 04:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC)