Leptothecata is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to
animals and
zoology. For more information, visit the
project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles
This article is part of WikiProject Marine life, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on
marine life. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles
Other: Add {{Portal|Marine life}} to related articles
The reference style for this article is cumbersome. The references should be place in
[1]</ref> tags using [1] for multiple instances.
PB666yap18:50, 8 July 2008 (UTC)reply
I did this because
for the scientifically-minded user, alphabetically sorted reference lists are the "gold standard". Our literature does not use footnotes of course, as it is not written for online viewing first, but no scientific journal will publish a manuscript without a proper, ordered, neat reference list. A wild hodge-podge of sources strewn about with no sort of order whatsoever like in
Lion#Notes makes the article essentially unusable as a proper scientific source, and such lacklustre referencing is one reason why Wikipedia has still too little credit among scientists.
several sources can be collated in one footnote
in sorce-rich articles, the problem of the last footnotes "bottoming out" is avoided - as there are the proper references following the footnotes, each footnote, if clicked upon, will be properly jumped to to appear at the top of the page.
it avoids code obfuscation. One of the guiding principles of Wikipedia is that ANYONE should be able to contribute to ANY article at ANY time ("You can edit this page now!").
Obfuscated code like in
Archaeopteryx#Authenticity (click "edit") is not understandable to novice users and is very cumbersome to edit even for excperienced users, effectively violating the fundaments of Wikipedia.
Shortened notes can be understood and edited intuitively by about everyone, even if the article has dozens of references, because the code
is kept simple.
Dysmorodrepanis (
talk)
20:41, 8 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Wiki Education assignment: Marine Biology- BI260
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2022 and 2 May 2022. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Kjfoster40 (
article contribs).
^
abCite error: The named reference whatever was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).
Leptothecata is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to
animals and
zoology. For more information, visit the
project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles
This article is part of WikiProject Marine life, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on
marine life. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles
Other: Add {{Portal|Marine life}} to related articles
The reference style for this article is cumbersome. The references should be place in
[1]</ref> tags using [1] for multiple instances.
PB666yap18:50, 8 July 2008 (UTC)reply
I did this because
for the scientifically-minded user, alphabetically sorted reference lists are the "gold standard". Our literature does not use footnotes of course, as it is not written for online viewing first, but no scientific journal will publish a manuscript without a proper, ordered, neat reference list. A wild hodge-podge of sources strewn about with no sort of order whatsoever like in
Lion#Notes makes the article essentially unusable as a proper scientific source, and such lacklustre referencing is one reason why Wikipedia has still too little credit among scientists.
several sources can be collated in one footnote
in sorce-rich articles, the problem of the last footnotes "bottoming out" is avoided - as there are the proper references following the footnotes, each footnote, if clicked upon, will be properly jumped to to appear at the top of the page.
it avoids code obfuscation. One of the guiding principles of Wikipedia is that ANYONE should be able to contribute to ANY article at ANY time ("You can edit this page now!").
Obfuscated code like in
Archaeopteryx#Authenticity (click "edit") is not understandable to novice users and is very cumbersome to edit even for excperienced users, effectively violating the fundaments of Wikipedia.
Shortened notes can be understood and edited intuitively by about everyone, even if the article has dozens of references, because the code
is kept simple.
Dysmorodrepanis (
talk)
20:41, 8 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Wiki Education assignment: Marine Biology- BI260
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2022 and 2 May 2022. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Kjfoster40 (
article contribs).
^
abCite error: The named reference whatever was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).