From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Citations and bibliography

With the exception of the Woodhead citation that I have just added, pretty much everything is wrong with the methods used in this article. The bibliography seems excessive and the citations are over-discursive. Any relevant points should be in the body of the text, with standard Wikipedia footnoting as per the Woodhead example. There are several possible citation schemes, of course, but the prevalent one is plain wrong here. And what the heck does "corpora" mean? Can't we say things in English? - Sitush ( talk) 06:43, 13 November 2012 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Citations and bibliography

With the exception of the Woodhead citation that I have just added, pretty much everything is wrong with the methods used in this article. The bibliography seems excessive and the citations are over-discursive. Any relevant points should be in the body of the text, with standard Wikipedia footnoting as per the Woodhead example. There are several possible citation schemes, of course, but the prevalent one is plain wrong here. And what the heck does "corpora" mean? Can't we say things in English? - Sitush ( talk) 06:43, 13 November 2012 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook