![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a map or maps be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Wikipedians in United States may be able to help! |
I know that the required age is eighteen, although with parental consent, minors can also be tattoed, I do not know the sources, but my artist told me this information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.62.35.164 ( talk) 04:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
When I created this article, I know I didn't get to finish adding all the 48 articles.. kinda stopped half way. But, I see that it is at 23 states instead of 48 =S. Wth? Can anyone add the missing states in alphabetical order with credible sources. -- Rmhs15 ( talk) 03:34, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Does Vermont not have any rules? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.68.208.74 ( talk) 14:08, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Would anyone object to me reformatting this article as a table? I feel like it would be much easier to read and find the information that readers are likely looking for that way. If no one objects over the next week or so I'll likely give it a go. Fyddlestix ( talk) 16:16, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Yeah by all means go ahead and add stuff! Any help appreciated! I'll get to removing/re-jiggering the columns as soon as I can. Fyddlestix ( talk) 00:18, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
" tattooing the hands or face is frequently said to be illegal, even though no U.S. state currently has such a ban". - Is the sugestion that one or more US states previously had such a ban? 86.177.208.67 ( talk) 20:31, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
I have removed the old list and added the table compiled by myself and Legitimus in its place. It is still a work in progress but I'm pretty convinced that this revision is an improvement that will help readers get what they need/want out of the article much more quickly and easily. For reference, this was the last version of the article before I swapped in the table. I am going to continue to work on:
All of this will take time, of course. This will be a long-term project to make sure that this page is complete and accurate. Anyone who is interested should feel free to help out or suggest improvements! Fyddlestix ( talk) 06:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
In all jurisdictions, individual tattooists may also choose to place additional restrictions based on their own moral feelings, such as refusing any clients under a specific age even with parental consent despite it being legal, or limiting the type and/or location of where they are willing to tattoo (such as refusing any work around intimate parts of the body). They may additionally refuse to perform specific artwork, including if they merely find it inappropriate or offensive, or refuse to work on a client that they suspect may be intoxicated. Artists sometimes claim their personal business restrictions are a matter of law even when it is not true, so as to avoid arguments with clients.
Good intentions, and I agree with the sentiment, but it appears to be one practitioner's private philosophy of customer service. It's not attestable facts about the legality of tattooing. 2601:644:400:500:61E9:2640:6A3A:7503 ( talk) 14:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Legal status of psilocybin mushrooms which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 01:45, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: TBD. Redundant. See Talk:Legal_status_of_psilocybin_mushrooms#Requested_move_8_June_2017 В²C ☎ 18:08, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Legal status of tattooing in the United States →
Legality of tattooing in the United States – Several different formats exist for the titles of articles regarding the legality of a particular thing. I believe that all of these should be consistent with each other and that that format should be "Legality of X" (instead of "Legal status of X, Laws regarding X, etc.) Others have noted that "legality" is a more common term when referring to whether something is legal or illegal than "legal status".
Michipedian (
talk)
01:48, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Legal status of tattooing in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:46, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a map or maps be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Wikipedians in United States may be able to help! |
I know that the required age is eighteen, although with parental consent, minors can also be tattoed, I do not know the sources, but my artist told me this information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.62.35.164 ( talk) 04:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
When I created this article, I know I didn't get to finish adding all the 48 articles.. kinda stopped half way. But, I see that it is at 23 states instead of 48 =S. Wth? Can anyone add the missing states in alphabetical order with credible sources. -- Rmhs15 ( talk) 03:34, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Does Vermont not have any rules? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.68.208.74 ( talk) 14:08, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Would anyone object to me reformatting this article as a table? I feel like it would be much easier to read and find the information that readers are likely looking for that way. If no one objects over the next week or so I'll likely give it a go. Fyddlestix ( talk) 16:16, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Yeah by all means go ahead and add stuff! Any help appreciated! I'll get to removing/re-jiggering the columns as soon as I can. Fyddlestix ( talk) 00:18, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
" tattooing the hands or face is frequently said to be illegal, even though no U.S. state currently has such a ban". - Is the sugestion that one or more US states previously had such a ban? 86.177.208.67 ( talk) 20:31, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
I have removed the old list and added the table compiled by myself and Legitimus in its place. It is still a work in progress but I'm pretty convinced that this revision is an improvement that will help readers get what they need/want out of the article much more quickly and easily. For reference, this was the last version of the article before I swapped in the table. I am going to continue to work on:
All of this will take time, of course. This will be a long-term project to make sure that this page is complete and accurate. Anyone who is interested should feel free to help out or suggest improvements! Fyddlestix ( talk) 06:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
In all jurisdictions, individual tattooists may also choose to place additional restrictions based on their own moral feelings, such as refusing any clients under a specific age even with parental consent despite it being legal, or limiting the type and/or location of where they are willing to tattoo (such as refusing any work around intimate parts of the body). They may additionally refuse to perform specific artwork, including if they merely find it inappropriate or offensive, or refuse to work on a client that they suspect may be intoxicated. Artists sometimes claim their personal business restrictions are a matter of law even when it is not true, so as to avoid arguments with clients.
Good intentions, and I agree with the sentiment, but it appears to be one practitioner's private philosophy of customer service. It's not attestable facts about the legality of tattooing. 2601:644:400:500:61E9:2640:6A3A:7503 ( talk) 14:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Legal status of psilocybin mushrooms which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 01:45, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: TBD. Redundant. See Talk:Legal_status_of_psilocybin_mushrooms#Requested_move_8_June_2017 В²C ☎ 18:08, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Legal status of tattooing in the United States →
Legality of tattooing in the United States – Several different formats exist for the titles of articles regarding the legality of a particular thing. I believe that all of these should be consistent with each other and that that format should be "Legality of X" (instead of "Legal status of X, Laws regarding X, etc.) Others have noted that "legality" is a more common term when referring to whether something is legal or illegal than "legal status".
Michipedian (
talk)
01:48, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Legal status of tattooing in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:46, 20 December 2017 (UTC)