From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The theorem also holds if cubes are replaced by arbitrary sets with diameter tending to zero, in the definition of the derivative."

I find this sentence confusing, and recommend its removal for two reasons: (1) The theorem is stated with balls. (2) I think it is false e.g. for thin rectangles pointing in arbitrary directions. See Chap. II and X in E. M. Stein, Harmonic Analysis.

140.180.4.116 ( talk) 13:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Ah. It's true for sets of bounded eccentricity. So not arbitrary sets, but ... I'll see if I can find a way to work it in. RayAYang ( talk) 22:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
oops. Already there. Silly me. RayAYang ( talk) 16:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The theorem also holds if cubes are replaced by arbitrary sets with diameter tending to zero, in the definition of the derivative."

I find this sentence confusing, and recommend its removal for two reasons: (1) The theorem is stated with balls. (2) I think it is false e.g. for thin rectangles pointing in arbitrary directions. See Chap. II and X in E. M. Stein, Harmonic Analysis.

140.180.4.116 ( talk) 13:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Ah. It's true for sets of bounded eccentricity. So not arbitrary sets, but ... I'll see if I can find a way to work it in. RayAYang ( talk) 22:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
oops. Already there. Silly me. RayAYang ( talk) 16:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook