This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Laxmi was attacked in Delhi’s Khan Market in 2005 by her acquaintances, Guddu (Athar hussain from BVP. Laxmi was 15 at that time and the act was seen as a revenge for Laxmi’s refusal to marry Guddu, her friend’s brother. Instead, Laxmi chose to confid in her parents, who encouraged her to seek counselling. Simultaneously, she also decided to take her case to the court, and the trial went on for four years. The result: Guddu was sentenced to 10 years in jail, and Rakhi was imprisoned for seven years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomarthings ( talk • contribs) 11:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Laxmi Agarwal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:53, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Tomarthings ( talk) 10:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Laxmi was attacked in Delhi’s Khan Market in 2005 by her acquaintances, Guddu and Rakhi. Laxmi was 15 at that time and the act was seen as a revenge for Laxmi’s refusal to marry Guddu, her friend’s brother.
Instead, Laxmi chose to confide in her parents, who encouraged her to seek counselling. Simultaneously, she also decided to take her case to the court, and the trial went on for four years. The result: Guddu was sentenced to 10 years in jail, and Rakhi was imprisoned for seven years.
Somebody try to change guddu name to naeem khan.. guddu is not a muslim.. guddu is a hindu and rekhi also a hindu Tomarthings ( talk) 10:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Edit to Add:
Wikipedia is comfortable obtaining information from dubious sources and then when some one points out the errors and refers to a high court judgment regarding the case of acid attack on Laxmi Agarwal you claim that you "don't use court judgments in biographies of living people". This is not just a biography but there is information about the acid attack on Laxmi and the relevant facts of the case/matter in the High Court judgment is therefore relevant to this page, more than the information sourced from the dubious tabloids/newspapers which appear to have found favour with Wiki administrators. At this rate Wiki will lose credibility - your sources of information have to be reliable (and some newspaper reports are highly dubious and very often factually incorrect). I therefore agree with @Tomarthings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndieG ( talk • contribs) 10:56, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change: "Agarwal was attacked in 2005 at an age of 15, by a 32-year-old man, whose romantic advances she had rejected." To: "Agarwal was attacked in 2005 at an age of 15, by Naeem Khan (alias Guddu), whose romantic advances she had rejected. Source: The name of the perpetrator (Naeem Khan alais Guddu) has been sourced from here https://indiankanoon.org/doc/32750721/ This is the copy of actual High Court verdict on the case, that clearly mentions the name of the perpetrator. Rahstiest ( talk) 13:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
In "However, it failed to do so, which angered the court. However, when the Centre failed to produce a plan, the Supreme Court warned that it will intervene and pass orders if the government failed to frame a policy to curb the sale of acid in order to prevent chemical attacks.", under PIL heading, remove the second 'However', and change the sentence to" When the Centre failed to... " Reason: Double howevers is not good sentence construction. Algalbloom ( talk) 14:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
It is only a grammatical change. No information is added or removed. Why are sources required? Algalbloom ( talk) 16:31, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
References
I read judgment. Rakhi is convicted but she didn’t throw acid and claim of police officer was wrong. — Harshil want to talk? 01:27, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
∯WBG converse 02:16, 9 January 2020 (UTC)... In the instant case, the appellant was frustrated and anguished on refusal of his love by victim Laxmi and had through his close associate got hydrochloric acid poured mercilessly on the face and chest of the victim. The act was a calculated and pre-planned one as he had roped in Rakhi to do the job. That the consequence of pouring Hydrochloric acid on the head is likely to cause death must be known to him or can be inferred and as such in my view, the offence clearly falls under the category of attempt to murder punishable under Section 307 of IPC and not under Section 326 of IPC...
...co-accused Rakhi, who was the wife of appellant‟s brother Imran.... Let’s provide complete details. — Harshil want to talk? 03:24, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Rakhi is convicted but she didn’t throw acid and claim of police-officer was wrong., given that you have come across the same legal document much prior to me. It's hard to have a reasonable discussion when the other side takes such extreme liberties with facts.
She denied that the appellant and Rakhi were not standing and talking at the place of the incident. She was unconscious when she reached the hospital.apologies for not reading completely. I think lead should mention that Naeem and his sister-in-law Rakhi attacked on her with acid. In details, we can mention Rakhi was sister-in-law of Naeem and wife of Imran; Naeem was given name as Guddu. All those lines of rejecting advances should be removed from lead. Subject is only known for acid attack on her, she became famous after attack, she did activism after attack and her convicted people should be mentioned in LEAD. In fact, it was already in lead for long ago.— Harshil want to talk? 03:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Are you jocking me that there’s no clarity? Just read judgement.— Harshil want to talk? 13:30, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
...There is substantial evidence to indicate that Rakhi was the wife of the brother of the appellant and was connected with him...
In light of WP:BLP and a 66.66% consensus in favor after sufficient passage of time, I have installed the majority-view ∯WBG converse 07:32, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The statement: "A minor then, Laxmi was attacked with acid by three men near Tughlaq road in New Delhi as she had refused to marry Nadeem Khan aka Guddu, of the trio." is factually incorrect and should be changed to: "A minor then, Laxmi was attacked with acid by two men (Nadeem Khan, his brother Imran Khan) and one woman (Rakhi) near Tughlaq road in New Delhi as she had refused to marry Nadeem Khan." 96.230.58.241 ( talk) 18:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Put it back to Nadeem Khan that is the original name 92.98.42.92 ( talk) 11:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
{{
edit protected}}
template. — Martin (
MSGJ ·
talk) 11:56, 13 January 2020 (UTC)This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The film Chhapak has been already released. Please update the article (Popular Culture section and in lede) accordingly. Regards Nizil ( talk) 15:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Laxmi was attacked in Delhi’s Khan Market in 2005 by her acquaintances, Guddu (Athar hussain from BVP. Laxmi was 15 at that time and the act was seen as a revenge for Laxmi’s refusal to marry Guddu, her friend’s brother. Instead, Laxmi chose to confid in her parents, who encouraged her to seek counselling. Simultaneously, she also decided to take her case to the court, and the trial went on for four years. The result: Guddu was sentenced to 10 years in jail, and Rakhi was imprisoned for seven years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomarthings ( talk • contribs) 11:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Laxmi Agarwal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:53, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Tomarthings ( talk) 10:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Laxmi was attacked in Delhi’s Khan Market in 2005 by her acquaintances, Guddu and Rakhi. Laxmi was 15 at that time and the act was seen as a revenge for Laxmi’s refusal to marry Guddu, her friend’s brother.
Instead, Laxmi chose to confide in her parents, who encouraged her to seek counselling. Simultaneously, she also decided to take her case to the court, and the trial went on for four years. The result: Guddu was sentenced to 10 years in jail, and Rakhi was imprisoned for seven years.
Somebody try to change guddu name to naeem khan.. guddu is not a muslim.. guddu is a hindu and rekhi also a hindu Tomarthings ( talk) 10:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Edit to Add:
Wikipedia is comfortable obtaining information from dubious sources and then when some one points out the errors and refers to a high court judgment regarding the case of acid attack on Laxmi Agarwal you claim that you "don't use court judgments in biographies of living people". This is not just a biography but there is information about the acid attack on Laxmi and the relevant facts of the case/matter in the High Court judgment is therefore relevant to this page, more than the information sourced from the dubious tabloids/newspapers which appear to have found favour with Wiki administrators. At this rate Wiki will lose credibility - your sources of information have to be reliable (and some newspaper reports are highly dubious and very often factually incorrect). I therefore agree with @Tomarthings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndieG ( talk • contribs) 10:56, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change: "Agarwal was attacked in 2005 at an age of 15, by a 32-year-old man, whose romantic advances she had rejected." To: "Agarwal was attacked in 2005 at an age of 15, by Naeem Khan (alias Guddu), whose romantic advances she had rejected. Source: The name of the perpetrator (Naeem Khan alais Guddu) has been sourced from here https://indiankanoon.org/doc/32750721/ This is the copy of actual High Court verdict on the case, that clearly mentions the name of the perpetrator. Rahstiest ( talk) 13:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
In "However, it failed to do so, which angered the court. However, when the Centre failed to produce a plan, the Supreme Court warned that it will intervene and pass orders if the government failed to frame a policy to curb the sale of acid in order to prevent chemical attacks.", under PIL heading, remove the second 'However', and change the sentence to" When the Centre failed to... " Reason: Double howevers is not good sentence construction. Algalbloom ( talk) 14:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
It is only a grammatical change. No information is added or removed. Why are sources required? Algalbloom ( talk) 16:31, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
References
I read judgment. Rakhi is convicted but she didn’t throw acid and claim of police officer was wrong. — Harshil want to talk? 01:27, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
∯WBG converse 02:16, 9 January 2020 (UTC)... In the instant case, the appellant was frustrated and anguished on refusal of his love by victim Laxmi and had through his close associate got hydrochloric acid poured mercilessly on the face and chest of the victim. The act was a calculated and pre-planned one as he had roped in Rakhi to do the job. That the consequence of pouring Hydrochloric acid on the head is likely to cause death must be known to him or can be inferred and as such in my view, the offence clearly falls under the category of attempt to murder punishable under Section 307 of IPC and not under Section 326 of IPC...
...co-accused Rakhi, who was the wife of appellant‟s brother Imran.... Let’s provide complete details. — Harshil want to talk? 03:24, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Rakhi is convicted but she didn’t throw acid and claim of police-officer was wrong., given that you have come across the same legal document much prior to me. It's hard to have a reasonable discussion when the other side takes such extreme liberties with facts.
She denied that the appellant and Rakhi were not standing and talking at the place of the incident. She was unconscious when she reached the hospital.apologies for not reading completely. I think lead should mention that Naeem and his sister-in-law Rakhi attacked on her with acid. In details, we can mention Rakhi was sister-in-law of Naeem and wife of Imran; Naeem was given name as Guddu. All those lines of rejecting advances should be removed from lead. Subject is only known for acid attack on her, she became famous after attack, she did activism after attack and her convicted people should be mentioned in LEAD. In fact, it was already in lead for long ago.— Harshil want to talk? 03:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Are you jocking me that there’s no clarity? Just read judgement.— Harshil want to talk? 13:30, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
...There is substantial evidence to indicate that Rakhi was the wife of the brother of the appellant and was connected with him...
In light of WP:BLP and a 66.66% consensus in favor after sufficient passage of time, I have installed the majority-view ∯WBG converse 07:32, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The statement: "A minor then, Laxmi was attacked with acid by three men near Tughlaq road in New Delhi as she had refused to marry Nadeem Khan aka Guddu, of the trio." is factually incorrect and should be changed to: "A minor then, Laxmi was attacked with acid by two men (Nadeem Khan, his brother Imran Khan) and one woman (Rakhi) near Tughlaq road in New Delhi as she had refused to marry Nadeem Khan." 96.230.58.241 ( talk) 18:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Put it back to Nadeem Khan that is the original name 92.98.42.92 ( talk) 11:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
{{
edit protected}}
template. — Martin (
MSGJ ·
talk) 11:56, 13 January 2020 (UTC)This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The film Chhapak has been already released. Please update the article (Popular Culture section and in lede) accordingly. Regards Nizil ( talk) 15:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)