A fact from Law of 4 February 1794 appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 June 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Desertarun (
talk) 13:55, 7 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Created by
Vahurzpu (
talk). Self-nominated at 04:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC).reply
Long enough, created within a week of nomination, passes Earwig's detector with flying colors, and the second hook is acceptable, although I propose a bit of modification to it. (All the sources are offline, so
WP:AGF.) The first hook is inaccurate: it should read "long debate", according to the article. Also, the second sentence in the Enactment section isn't sourced (and possibly the first should be too). Other than that, it looks good to go.
@
Clarityfiend: I amended ALT0 (another one of the sources had a very similar quote without that modifier) and clarified the sourcing in the Enactment section. I agree ALT1a is better than ALT1; no preference on that vs. ALT0.
Vahurzpu (
talk) 05:27, 31 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Remaining issues have been addressed.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 06:29, 31 May 2021 (UTC)reply
A fact from Law of 4 February 1794 appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 June 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Desertarun (
talk) 13:55, 7 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Created by
Vahurzpu (
talk). Self-nominated at 04:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC).reply
Long enough, created within a week of nomination, passes Earwig's detector with flying colors, and the second hook is acceptable, although I propose a bit of modification to it. (All the sources are offline, so
WP:AGF.) The first hook is inaccurate: it should read "long debate", according to the article. Also, the second sentence in the Enactment section isn't sourced (and possibly the first should be too). Other than that, it looks good to go.
@
Clarityfiend: I amended ALT0 (another one of the sources had a very similar quote without that modifier) and clarified the sourcing in the Enactment section. I agree ALT1a is better than ALT1; no preference on that vs. ALT0.
Vahurzpu (
talk) 05:27, 31 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Remaining issues have been addressed.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 06:29, 31 May 2021 (UTC)reply