This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As per my comments on the Talk:Lance Armstrong page, I would be in favour of merging these two articles into a broader article on the whole affair. Born2cycle has suggested carrying on the discussion here instead and I agree. Thoughts on the proposed merger? WelshDaveRyan ( talk) 19:58, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
That said, I would agree with merging both articles into a new one called Lance Armstrong doping history. -- Born2cycle ( talk) 21:32, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Over on the talk page of the main page Dimspace has suggested that we not merge the Fed case and the USADA case. I don't know. That's a good point, but with the title and implied expanded scope of "Lance Armstrong doping history" maybe it fits? Or how about something like Lance Armstrong doping and legal issues? -- Born2cycle ( talk) 16:21, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
All I will say, is that im strongly in the camp that this shouldnt be called the "lance armstrong doping case", but "the USADA cycling investigation". I really do think we are on dodgy ground implying the whole case is about armstrong. Dimspace ( talk) 18:07, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
References
I am slowly putting online all the various bits of documentation for the armstrong case that arent involved in the USADA documents. and in some sort of chronological order. I have put up PDF's of all parts of the Armstrong v USADA texas court case here [1]. The PDF's can be used as sources in the main article should we wish to develop on the texas court case section Dimspace ( talk) 18:09, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
References
Per Dimspace's points above, how about USADA cycling investigation? Since D already stands for doping, including "doping" in the title is redundant. -- Born2cycle ( talk) 18:33, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Under the heading about the fed investigation there was references to things that were not related to the actual investigation. Text about the "60 minutes" segment and the Swiss allegations have nothing to do with the Federal investigation.
In fact, I find some of what I deleted was copied in toto from the allegations page, and all of it is discussed fully there.
People adding things here need to stay on topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackhammer111 ( talk • contribs) 18:20, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Speaking of headings, shouldn't this article be called Lance Armstrong doping cases, not case since it is about two totally seperate cases? Jackhammer111 ( talk) 18:30, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Lance Armstrong doping case. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lance Armstrong doping case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:38, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lance Armstrong doping case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As per my comments on the Talk:Lance Armstrong page, I would be in favour of merging these two articles into a broader article on the whole affair. Born2cycle has suggested carrying on the discussion here instead and I agree. Thoughts on the proposed merger? WelshDaveRyan ( talk) 19:58, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
That said, I would agree with merging both articles into a new one called Lance Armstrong doping history. -- Born2cycle ( talk) 21:32, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Over on the talk page of the main page Dimspace has suggested that we not merge the Fed case and the USADA case. I don't know. That's a good point, but with the title and implied expanded scope of "Lance Armstrong doping history" maybe it fits? Or how about something like Lance Armstrong doping and legal issues? -- Born2cycle ( talk) 16:21, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
All I will say, is that im strongly in the camp that this shouldnt be called the "lance armstrong doping case", but "the USADA cycling investigation". I really do think we are on dodgy ground implying the whole case is about armstrong. Dimspace ( talk) 18:07, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
References
I am slowly putting online all the various bits of documentation for the armstrong case that arent involved in the USADA documents. and in some sort of chronological order. I have put up PDF's of all parts of the Armstrong v USADA texas court case here [1]. The PDF's can be used as sources in the main article should we wish to develop on the texas court case section Dimspace ( talk) 18:09, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
References
Per Dimspace's points above, how about USADA cycling investigation? Since D already stands for doping, including "doping" in the title is redundant. -- Born2cycle ( talk) 18:33, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Under the heading about the fed investigation there was references to things that were not related to the actual investigation. Text about the "60 minutes" segment and the Swiss allegations have nothing to do with the Federal investigation.
In fact, I find some of what I deleted was copied in toto from the allegations page, and all of it is discussed fully there.
People adding things here need to stay on topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackhammer111 ( talk • contribs) 18:20, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Speaking of headings, shouldn't this article be called Lance Armstrong doping cases, not case since it is about two totally seperate cases? Jackhammer111 ( talk) 18:30, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Lance Armstrong doping case. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lance Armstrong doping case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:38, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lance Armstrong doping case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC)