This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Vkottapiu, Laceyceruolo, Ariannagiannini.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 23:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Do we want to add early reception for the movie from Tellurude or do we just wait until it's out in theatres?-- QueerFilmNerd ( talk) 18:28, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Should a quote from the film's distrubutor praising the director be in the release section? I have concerns that this is makes the article look like an advertisement, however an IP editor strongly opposes it's removal. -- Deathawk ( talk) 05:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
I really hope I am not stepping on anyone's toes by doing this, but I have restored an older version of the production section that I had worked on. Back in September I was working on the page when an IP editor began disputing my edits. I tried to work with them, although it became increasingly apparent that they were not open for collaborating. They've made plenty of edits over the ensuing months on this page, until the page was locked, for what I presume this IP's behavior. Given the circumstance I decided to restore my old version, as the IP address was the only person who objected to my edits. If someone has a problem with this action, they are free to revert this action. I am just trying to do what's right for this article. -- Deathawk ( talk) 09:32, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Per Wiki rules on the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film, the infobox should only include the premiere and country of production (US). Also, while the plot has its own section in article, the entire article should be summarized up top, including synopsis and review summaries. These are laid out on the Wiki Film article template page, and any desires to go against the grain should be addressed here.
Also, the film’s limited debut resulted in the best theater average for a female director, not overall limited debut. It’s stated in the source. TropicAces ( talk) 15:49, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
National Board of Review 189.209.30.179 ( talk) 03:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Do we maybe want to start (or in a bit, when more lists come out), want to put a section for "top 10" lists in which Lady Bird appears? Like the NBR and the AFI and the other lists it's appeared on? It might tidy the awards section a bit.-- QueerFilmNerd ( talk) 18:20, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
I have been twice reverted without explanation by TheOldJacobite – once without explanation and once on the basis that I am using "dubious logic". The only edits I made were minor stylistic changes entirely pursuant to MOS:DATE, MOS:COMMA, MOS:CURLY, and MOS:NBSP. Why is this, TheOldJacobite? 142.161.81.20 ( talk) 18:54, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Vkottapiu, Laceyceruolo, Ariannagiannini.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 23:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Do we want to add early reception for the movie from Tellurude or do we just wait until it's out in theatres?-- QueerFilmNerd ( talk) 18:28, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Should a quote from the film's distrubutor praising the director be in the release section? I have concerns that this is makes the article look like an advertisement, however an IP editor strongly opposes it's removal. -- Deathawk ( talk) 05:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
I really hope I am not stepping on anyone's toes by doing this, but I have restored an older version of the production section that I had worked on. Back in September I was working on the page when an IP editor began disputing my edits. I tried to work with them, although it became increasingly apparent that they were not open for collaborating. They've made plenty of edits over the ensuing months on this page, until the page was locked, for what I presume this IP's behavior. Given the circumstance I decided to restore my old version, as the IP address was the only person who objected to my edits. If someone has a problem with this action, they are free to revert this action. I am just trying to do what's right for this article. -- Deathawk ( talk) 09:32, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Per Wiki rules on the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film, the infobox should only include the premiere and country of production (US). Also, while the plot has its own section in article, the entire article should be summarized up top, including synopsis and review summaries. These are laid out on the Wiki Film article template page, and any desires to go against the grain should be addressed here.
Also, the film’s limited debut resulted in the best theater average for a female director, not overall limited debut. It’s stated in the source. TropicAces ( talk) 15:49, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
National Board of Review 189.209.30.179 ( talk) 03:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Do we maybe want to start (or in a bit, when more lists come out), want to put a section for "top 10" lists in which Lady Bird appears? Like the NBR and the AFI and the other lists it's appeared on? It might tidy the awards section a bit.-- QueerFilmNerd ( talk) 18:20, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
I have been twice reverted without explanation by TheOldJacobite – once without explanation and once on the basis that I am using "dubious logic". The only edits I made were minor stylistic changes entirely pursuant to MOS:DATE, MOS:COMMA, MOS:CURLY, and MOS:NBSP. Why is this, TheOldJacobite? 142.161.81.20 ( talk) 18:54, 24 March 2018 (UTC)