![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on LGBT rights in Arizona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:04, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
A recent addition regarding a ballot initiative in Mesa said that the signatures had been certified. However, the source for that info was this tweet, and if you check that tweet, it links to a source that says just the opposite - that there is still a several day period for those signatures to be challenged (and that concurs with the source already in the section.) As such, I have removed the claim and the use of the tweet as a reference. (I also removed the word "forcibly" to describe the placing of an initiative on the ballot; a ballot initiative is a fairly standard democratic process, and I can't think of anywhere else where placing something on a ballot is considered "forcible". ) -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 19:04, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on LGBT rights in Arizona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:04, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
A recent addition regarding a ballot initiative in Mesa said that the signatures had been certified. However, the source for that info was this tweet, and if you check that tweet, it links to a source that says just the opposite - that there is still a several day period for those signatures to be challenged (and that concurs with the source already in the section.) As such, I have removed the claim and the use of the tweet as a reference. (I also removed the word "forcibly" to describe the placing of an initiative on the ballot; a ballot initiative is a fairly standard democratic process, and I can't think of anywhere else where placing something on a ballot is considered "forcible". ) -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 19:04, 7 May 2021 (UTC)