The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move — Martin ( MSGJ ·  talk) 21:51, 4 December 2019 (UTC) — Martin ( MSGJ ·  talk) 21:51, 4 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Lärabar → Larabar – Everything in WP:CAMELCASE seems to say that the umlaut above the A should be ignored, despite the branding.  Trebuchette ( talk) 06:14, 21 November 2019 (UTC) reply

This is a contested technical request ( permalink). -- / Alex/ ₂₁ 13:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Trebuchette: The only mention of diacritics at MOS:TM says not to correct trademarks by adding them (e.g. Uber→Über). Plenty of reliable sources use the Lärabar spelling. -- Ahecht ( TALK
PAGE) 13:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC) reply

• Comment – The company does claim that the umlaut is just a decorative stylization. We do respect the decorative metal umlauts in Mötley Crüe and Motörhead, but few newspapers seem to use it for the Larabar. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC) reply

These indeed look like highly relevant examples. I checked their talk pages, and it doesn't look either title has ever been challenged in an RM. I'm actually a little dubious that either would stand up to scrutiny, since it seems like the umlauts aren't used in a clear majority of RS. Colin M ( talk) 21:39, 21 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Häagen-Dazs is similar and the article has an umlaut in the title. Peter James ( talk) 18:06, 27 November 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.