A news item involving Kyzyl-Agash Dam failure was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 15 March 2010. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Kyzyl-Agash Dam failure be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Kazakhstan may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
I have no any official source but witnesses who visited the village after the disaster - they say more than 300 dead bodies were found. 37 dead is official version. Goverment hides the trith as always in our country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.47.199.28 ( talk) 17:00, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
This article tells us nothing about the dam.. what type, when built &c &c it seems to be a "news article" about a dam disaster.-- SilasW ( talk) 21:11, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello! This is me again. Can you accept an opposition newspaper as a relyable source. "Svoboda slova" (Leberty of speech) No. 11 (257) of March 18, 2010, in the article "Tragedy in Kyzyl-Agash" wrote that minimal number of dead was above 200, most of them old people and children. The exact number of dead is impossible to count officially, because it is prohibited by the administration of region and country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.56.73.170 ( talk) 13:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your advices. I've made an account and inserted my part of information. This is the first time I edit any WP page. Hope I did everything right. ;) And I am also very thankful for your article and attention. As for technical characteristics of the Kyzyl Agash Dam, I'll try to find them and include here too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AnaisAmaru ( talk • contribs) 15:29, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Kyzyl-Agash Dam failure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:46, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Perhaps it was this Bot's formatting changes which have caused 2 references to appear with the title "Archived copy" instead of the actual title. I there a way to fix this? ˜˜˜˜ "Pij" ( talk) 05:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
A news item involving Kyzyl-Agash Dam failure was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 15 March 2010. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Kyzyl-Agash Dam failure be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Kazakhstan may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
I have no any official source but witnesses who visited the village after the disaster - they say more than 300 dead bodies were found. 37 dead is official version. Goverment hides the trith as always in our country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.47.199.28 ( talk) 17:00, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
This article tells us nothing about the dam.. what type, when built &c &c it seems to be a "news article" about a dam disaster.-- SilasW ( talk) 21:11, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello! This is me again. Can you accept an opposition newspaper as a relyable source. "Svoboda slova" (Leberty of speech) No. 11 (257) of March 18, 2010, in the article "Tragedy in Kyzyl-Agash" wrote that minimal number of dead was above 200, most of them old people and children. The exact number of dead is impossible to count officially, because it is prohibited by the administration of region and country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.56.73.170 ( talk) 13:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your advices. I've made an account and inserted my part of information. This is the first time I edit any WP page. Hope I did everything right. ;) And I am also very thankful for your article and attention. As for technical characteristics of the Kyzyl Agash Dam, I'll try to find them and include here too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AnaisAmaru ( talk • contribs) 15:29, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Kyzyl-Agash Dam failure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:46, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Perhaps it was this Bot's formatting changes which have caused 2 references to appear with the title "Archived copy" instead of the actual title. I there a way to fix this? ˜˜˜˜ "Pij" ( talk) 05:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC)