![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
I have reverted the undiscussed move of the page from "Kurdish coffee" to "Menengic coffee" by Suicideboi. You must follow the procedures at Wikipedia:Requested moves if you wish to propose a move of the article, thanks. -- IamNotU ( talk) 14:06, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
There is no reason to expect a dispute concerning this move so i have moved the page back to "Menengic coffee", thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suicideboi ( talk • contribs) 14:10, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi guys. Rather than revert warring over this, may I (strongly) suggest that the issue be discussed here before any more moves, to try building consensus. The original move was fine, in the sense that Wikipedia:Requested moves is only needed when the editor who wants the name change is unable to perform the move themselves due to technical reasons. That being said, it's obvious that this was a controversial decision, so discussion and consensus-building is the way forward. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:18, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
not travel guides. if i wanted to post from magazine websites like kurdistan24 or chicago turbine i could list 100 more sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suicideboi ( talk • contribs) 18:24, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308814611010958. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see
"using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or
"donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. IamNotU ( talk) 16:34, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
There was one orphaned citation that might be useful, but I don't know what it contains:
<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327573775_Somut_Olmayan_Kulturel_Miras_Olarak_Kahve_Gelenegi_ve_Tuketimi_Hakkinda_Bir_Arastirma_Hatay_Gaziantep_ve_Sanliurfa_Ornekleri_An_Investigation_As_An_Uncommitted_Cultural_Heritage_Cofee_Tradition_And_Co/citation/download|title=An Investigation As An Uncommitted Cultural Heritage Coffee Tradition And Consumption: Hatay, Gaziantep And Şanlıurfa Samples|last=|first=|date=|website=|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=}}</ref>
-- IamNotU ( talk) 16:37, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
I've restored the sourced material about it being a traditional Kurdish beverage. I'm sure it's also a traditional Turkish beverage, but the two are not mutually exclusive. For example, Künefe is considered by many to be a traditional dessert of Antakya and the Hatay region of Turkey, but that doesn't mean it's not a traditional dessert of Nablus in Palestine, which it definitely is. -- IamNotU ( talk) 16:55, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
I have reverted the undiscussed move of the page from "Kurdish coffee" to "Menengic coffee" by Suicideboi. You must follow the procedures at Wikipedia:Requested moves if you wish to propose a move of the article, thanks. -- IamNotU ( talk) 14:06, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
There is no reason to expect a dispute concerning this move so i have moved the page back to "Menengic coffee", thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suicideboi ( talk • contribs) 14:10, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi guys. Rather than revert warring over this, may I (strongly) suggest that the issue be discussed here before any more moves, to try building consensus. The original move was fine, in the sense that Wikipedia:Requested moves is only needed when the editor who wants the name change is unable to perform the move themselves due to technical reasons. That being said, it's obvious that this was a controversial decision, so discussion and consensus-building is the way forward. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:18, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
not travel guides. if i wanted to post from magazine websites like kurdistan24 or chicago turbine i could list 100 more sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suicideboi ( talk • contribs) 18:24, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308814611010958. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see
"using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or
"donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. IamNotU ( talk) 16:34, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
There was one orphaned citation that might be useful, but I don't know what it contains:
<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327573775_Somut_Olmayan_Kulturel_Miras_Olarak_Kahve_Gelenegi_ve_Tuketimi_Hakkinda_Bir_Arastirma_Hatay_Gaziantep_ve_Sanliurfa_Ornekleri_An_Investigation_As_An_Uncommitted_Cultural_Heritage_Cofee_Tradition_And_Co/citation/download|title=An Investigation As An Uncommitted Cultural Heritage Coffee Tradition And Consumption: Hatay, Gaziantep And Şanlıurfa Samples|last=|first=|date=|website=|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=}}</ref>
-- IamNotU ( talk) 16:37, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
I've restored the sourced material about it being a traditional Kurdish beverage. I'm sure it's also a traditional Turkish beverage, but the two are not mutually exclusive. For example, Künefe is considered by many to be a traditional dessert of Antakya and the Hatay region of Turkey, but that doesn't mean it's not a traditional dessert of Nablus in Palestine, which it definitely is. -- IamNotU ( talk) 16:55, 8 October 2019 (UTC)