This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kristin recently did a series on her Lasik procedure. I was going to add a blurb on it under the Filmography section; it this the right place for this? Wanted to check before I edited. Thanks! Lauraxp 16:58, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Cavallari is Italian-American. I added this before, and it was removed.
Stop vandalizing the site, you punk.
Don't know but I wuld like it if anyone would put some in here.
She should be on the Laguna Beach wiki, or the Laguna Beach cast wiki, she does not need an entire page. This page should be deleted ASAP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.161.131.133 ( talk • contribs)
Shes not dead ,why does it say shes dead?
This page needs to be Deleted her only success was being on a Reality Tv show, she is not a star, and does not even qualify as an actor, she does not meet the standerds too have a wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.161.131.101 ( talk • contribs)
E! Online ( http://www.eonline.com/Facts/People/Bio/0,128,73808,00.html) says she was born in Chicago, but the article says Colorado. Which is it? -- Thebigjc 04:51, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
no one seems to know. some places say illinois, some say colorado. and in the laguna beach book, it says she lived in connecticut before she moved to colorado, which was before she moved to illinois, so maybe she was born in connecticut. who knows.
IP User: 24.161.131.101 and 24.161.131.133 (who are the same person). Please stop trolling this talk page and inserting nonsense such as "she doesn't deserve her own page." The subject CLEARLY meets the established guidelines for inclusion in wikipedia. I'm sorry that you don't like it, but that is simply the way it is. Additionally, blanking of pages is considered vandalism and can get you banned, please refrain from blanking pages in the future. I have restored the page in its entirety. Batman2005 21:05, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Just rememved a reference to Kristin Cavallari as a "slut". Seems that there's a very strange campaign against this entry, so someone should keep an eye out for it.
Reply to above: Definitely. If I were an administrator right now, I'd suspend them for making such Jeff Hardy & Bam Margera-type remarks like that. I'm getting sick and tired of vandals being highly influenced by those two to vandalize Kristin Cavallari (and I need to stop talking like Elliot Stabler from Law & Order: SVU as well). She does not deserve to be called that. I will DEFINITELY be keeping an eye out for punk and goth kids vandalizing this page at the behest of Jeff Hardy & Bam Margera. Sounds like Jun Kazama could do away with them... ;-) --D.F. Williams 03:21, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
But anyway, to those who advocate deletion of this article, the subject is clearly notable and not just for Laguna Beach, as she is a constant subject of Hollywood news programs and has acted in her own right. -- Tractorkingsfan 04:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Someone needs to mention the Teen People article in which she said she lost her virginity at 14. It created a little beat of heat and obviously contributed to the perception she's a "slut" (see above). Very important and it should be mentioned. Aaрон Кинни ( t) 05:26, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Doesn't Wikipedia have a policy against angry 4-letter words like that? -- D.F. Williams 13:24, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Who cares about that? What's strange is: no reference to Lauren Conrad on the page. Isn't the Kristin-Lauren feud a major reason for Cavallari's fame? [anonymous user] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.91.208.171 ( talk) 18:45, August 20, 2007 (UTC)
It is Cavalleri.
it just is.
ok?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by KmsTigers02 ( talk • contribs) .
See [1] Model is defined as "a person or thing that serves as a pattern for an artist; especially : one who poses for an artist" or "one who is employed to display clothes or other merchandise." Nowhere does it say that a model has to be signed with a modeling agency. One could additionally argue that an actor or actresses Agent, or Manager who books and sets up said photo shoots is a type of talent agent, thus serves the same functino as a modeling agency. Additionally, the wikipedia page for model says absolutely nothing about the necessity of a modeling agency. The Category says nothing about the necessity of a modeling agency, or that for inclusion modeling must be the primary job. Simply put, a person who serves in one single advertisement for a single product is a model, and has served as a model. Cavallari has appeared in numerous photoshoots as a model including some advertisements....appearing in advertisements and being paid for it.....makes her a model. Show me one place where it says that an actor or actress isn't a real model and i'll delete the information, void of any proof to the contrary, Cavallari is a model based on past work history. Batman2005 11:06, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
The thing is, the category makes no stipulation on number/type of works for inclusion. Cavallari has done numerous magazines, has also been in several advertisements for different companies. If she had been a sales clerk at a 7-11 previously there likely would be mention of it somewhere in the article, and if there was a category of "people who used to work at 7-11" then she would certainly be in it. Cavallari is a model, whether the editors herein like it or not. Not including her in the models category simply because she is predominiately an actress is subjective and POV. If you don't think she should be included, then changes need to be made on the category, stipulating the criteria for inclusion to excluse people like Cavallari who are notable for one thing, then move into another field. Shaquille O'Neal is listed in MANY actor categories, but he's only been in a few different movies. Should he be removed? Cavallari has likely been in as many advertisements and magazines as O'Neal has been in movies, the inclusion of both O'Neal in Actor categories and Cavallari in Model categories are totally appropriate.
Batman2005
19:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
"She has a pierced navel". Does this alleged fact warrant an entry?
Does she really have a sister named Peighton The article refers to her as "now 13", but there has never been any mention of this so called sister, nor is it mentioned in the article cited. Additionally, and internet search of "Peighton Cavallari" only brings up the exact sentence from the Wikipedia article...seems suspicious that there are no other internet mentions of photos of this sister. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
89.139.21.23 (
talk)
04:53, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Kristin's b-day is listed as Jan. 5, 1987 but all sources I've been looking at report Jan 14, 1987. Does someone have a way to confirm which day it is so that we can source it? Thanks!-- Excelcleo 19:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Kristin's bday IS january 5...She even mentions it in an episode of the Hills Season 5! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.94.215 ( talk) 01:26, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Image:Cavallari on UPN.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 00:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Specifically when To celebrIty media whores. People.com is almost never acceptable as a source on wikipedia 206.116.112.61 ( talk) 00:00, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
An IP editor has recently been adding promotional material to the lead [2], as well as restoring material that is not supported by the cited sources [3]. Content on Wikipedia needs to be cited to reliable sources, and cannot be based solely on the original research or opinions of Wikipedia editors. Additionally, per WP:BLPLEAD, occupations in the lead should be "one, or possibly more, noteworthy positions, activities, or roles that the person is mainly known for, avoiding subjective or contentious terms." However, none of the sources added by the IP editor support those descriptions in the lead. If sources are available that support these edits, then they should be included prior to restoring the material per WP:BURDEN. – wallyfromdilbert ( talk) 19:40, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kristin recently did a series on her Lasik procedure. I was going to add a blurb on it under the Filmography section; it this the right place for this? Wanted to check before I edited. Thanks! Lauraxp 16:58, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Cavallari is Italian-American. I added this before, and it was removed.
Stop vandalizing the site, you punk.
Don't know but I wuld like it if anyone would put some in here.
She should be on the Laguna Beach wiki, or the Laguna Beach cast wiki, she does not need an entire page. This page should be deleted ASAP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.161.131.133 ( talk • contribs)
Shes not dead ,why does it say shes dead?
This page needs to be Deleted her only success was being on a Reality Tv show, she is not a star, and does not even qualify as an actor, she does not meet the standerds too have a wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.161.131.101 ( talk • contribs)
E! Online ( http://www.eonline.com/Facts/People/Bio/0,128,73808,00.html) says she was born in Chicago, but the article says Colorado. Which is it? -- Thebigjc 04:51, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
no one seems to know. some places say illinois, some say colorado. and in the laguna beach book, it says she lived in connecticut before she moved to colorado, which was before she moved to illinois, so maybe she was born in connecticut. who knows.
IP User: 24.161.131.101 and 24.161.131.133 (who are the same person). Please stop trolling this talk page and inserting nonsense such as "she doesn't deserve her own page." The subject CLEARLY meets the established guidelines for inclusion in wikipedia. I'm sorry that you don't like it, but that is simply the way it is. Additionally, blanking of pages is considered vandalism and can get you banned, please refrain from blanking pages in the future. I have restored the page in its entirety. Batman2005 21:05, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Just rememved a reference to Kristin Cavallari as a "slut". Seems that there's a very strange campaign against this entry, so someone should keep an eye out for it.
Reply to above: Definitely. If I were an administrator right now, I'd suspend them for making such Jeff Hardy & Bam Margera-type remarks like that. I'm getting sick and tired of vandals being highly influenced by those two to vandalize Kristin Cavallari (and I need to stop talking like Elliot Stabler from Law & Order: SVU as well). She does not deserve to be called that. I will DEFINITELY be keeping an eye out for punk and goth kids vandalizing this page at the behest of Jeff Hardy & Bam Margera. Sounds like Jun Kazama could do away with them... ;-) --D.F. Williams 03:21, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
But anyway, to those who advocate deletion of this article, the subject is clearly notable and not just for Laguna Beach, as she is a constant subject of Hollywood news programs and has acted in her own right. -- Tractorkingsfan 04:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Someone needs to mention the Teen People article in which she said she lost her virginity at 14. It created a little beat of heat and obviously contributed to the perception she's a "slut" (see above). Very important and it should be mentioned. Aaрон Кинни ( t) 05:26, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Doesn't Wikipedia have a policy against angry 4-letter words like that? -- D.F. Williams 13:24, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Who cares about that? What's strange is: no reference to Lauren Conrad on the page. Isn't the Kristin-Lauren feud a major reason for Cavallari's fame? [anonymous user] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.91.208.171 ( talk) 18:45, August 20, 2007 (UTC)
It is Cavalleri.
it just is.
ok?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by KmsTigers02 ( talk • contribs) .
See [1] Model is defined as "a person or thing that serves as a pattern for an artist; especially : one who poses for an artist" or "one who is employed to display clothes or other merchandise." Nowhere does it say that a model has to be signed with a modeling agency. One could additionally argue that an actor or actresses Agent, or Manager who books and sets up said photo shoots is a type of talent agent, thus serves the same functino as a modeling agency. Additionally, the wikipedia page for model says absolutely nothing about the necessity of a modeling agency. The Category says nothing about the necessity of a modeling agency, or that for inclusion modeling must be the primary job. Simply put, a person who serves in one single advertisement for a single product is a model, and has served as a model. Cavallari has appeared in numerous photoshoots as a model including some advertisements....appearing in advertisements and being paid for it.....makes her a model. Show me one place where it says that an actor or actress isn't a real model and i'll delete the information, void of any proof to the contrary, Cavallari is a model based on past work history. Batman2005 11:06, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
The thing is, the category makes no stipulation on number/type of works for inclusion. Cavallari has done numerous magazines, has also been in several advertisements for different companies. If she had been a sales clerk at a 7-11 previously there likely would be mention of it somewhere in the article, and if there was a category of "people who used to work at 7-11" then she would certainly be in it. Cavallari is a model, whether the editors herein like it or not. Not including her in the models category simply because she is predominiately an actress is subjective and POV. If you don't think she should be included, then changes need to be made on the category, stipulating the criteria for inclusion to excluse people like Cavallari who are notable for one thing, then move into another field. Shaquille O'Neal is listed in MANY actor categories, but he's only been in a few different movies. Should he be removed? Cavallari has likely been in as many advertisements and magazines as O'Neal has been in movies, the inclusion of both O'Neal in Actor categories and Cavallari in Model categories are totally appropriate.
Batman2005
19:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
"She has a pierced navel". Does this alleged fact warrant an entry?
Does she really have a sister named Peighton The article refers to her as "now 13", but there has never been any mention of this so called sister, nor is it mentioned in the article cited. Additionally, and internet search of "Peighton Cavallari" only brings up the exact sentence from the Wikipedia article...seems suspicious that there are no other internet mentions of photos of this sister. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
89.139.21.23 (
talk)
04:53, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Kristin's b-day is listed as Jan. 5, 1987 but all sources I've been looking at report Jan 14, 1987. Does someone have a way to confirm which day it is so that we can source it? Thanks!-- Excelcleo 19:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Kristin's bday IS january 5...She even mentions it in an episode of the Hills Season 5! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.94.215 ( talk) 01:26, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Image:Cavallari on UPN.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 00:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Specifically when To celebrIty media whores. People.com is almost never acceptable as a source on wikipedia 206.116.112.61 ( talk) 00:00, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
An IP editor has recently been adding promotional material to the lead [2], as well as restoring material that is not supported by the cited sources [3]. Content on Wikipedia needs to be cited to reliable sources, and cannot be based solely on the original research or opinions of Wikipedia editors. Additionally, per WP:BLPLEAD, occupations in the lead should be "one, or possibly more, noteworthy positions, activities, or roles that the person is mainly known for, avoiding subjective or contentious terms." However, none of the sources added by the IP editor support those descriptions in the lead. If sources are available that support these edits, then they should be included prior to restoring the material per WP:BURDEN. – wallyfromdilbert ( talk) 19:40, 12 October 2021 (UTC)