This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Kristi Noem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.keloland.com/News/NewsDetail6371.cfm?Id=131032When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:51, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
The text, or link, of her speech should be included in article. Wikipietime ( talk) 14:35, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
I sourced a critique of a coronavirus study to RT and clearly identified it as a source of propaganda, not to be taken as fact. Activist ( talk) 00:16, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
The manual of style calls for a portrait image, and asks that the best quality of image be used, as indicated in the manual of style under Image quality.
See articles on Diane Feinstein and Elizabeth Warren for examples of proper image selection. Gunbirddriver ( talk) 22:11, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The choice of picture reveals a great deal about the person who selected it. Kristi is a beautiful so the selected picture appears to have been doctored. It doesn't look like her at all.
Gosh, I wonder what could have motivated such petty meanness.
The choice of picture reveals a great deal about the person who selected it. Kristi is a beautiful so the selected picture appears to have been doctored. It doesn't look like her at all.
Gosh, I wonder what could have motivated such petty meanness.
@ PFVF: I'm about to revert your edit for a second time. Its relevance to the article is dubious (see WP:NOTNEWS), it seems to espouse a point of view (see WP:NPOV), and as I said in my previous edit summary, the grammar and wording make it very difficult to understand. Because you have reverted the removal of your edit three times and been warned on your talk page, this is likely considered a WP:EDITWAR. Please be aware that I am attempting to resolve the issue on this talk page, and that adding back your edit without discussion may lead to a block for edit warring. ezlev signed this. talk 21:33, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
@Ezlev, I am brand new to Wikipedia. I don't know the procedures, which you obviously do as you harass me with all the buzz words and strong-arm tactics of a bully. What I do know, however, is that you consider yourself a grammar cop while you make pompous "grammar correction" edits that introduce grammatical errors where none existed! You also show no understanding of the difference between grammar and style. But, most importantly, you show evidence of someone too ignorant to know how ignorant she is. I don't know why you want to leave standing an attribution to Governor Noem that is obsolete -- that she no longer believes, and that she specifically has updated -- but your refusal to allow the update is VANDALISM. Such vandalism does not further the mission of Wikipedia to increase understanding (in this case of Governor Noem's own statements about international trade, particularly the China trade agreement and its benefits to American agriculture) in truth.
I don't know all the procedures to warn you to stop (in all of your personalities) because I am new here, and I haven't hung out at Wikipedia as you obviously do. But, if you persist, I will find out how to get as many of your abusive, harassing, obstructionist personalities blocked as I can. PFVF ( talk) 01:33, 9 November 2020 (UTC)PFVF
@Ezlev, content is everything, especially when it is quotations from the subject of the Wiki page on the matter at hand; the Governor's viewpoint is totally germane! Also, I would ask in future -- after noting the proliferation of grammatical and punctuation errors in this reply of yours -- that you show more care in deeming to "correct" others' grammar. Please take the time to LISTEN, to hear, and to read references before you claim something is "unreadable." Maybe you don't understand because you don't comprehend, rather than because you bear animus. We'll see. PFVF ( talk) 03:24, 9 November 2020 (UTC)PFVF
@ Snooganssnoogans: could you explain your recent deletion of 1710 bytes from the article? Elizium23 ( talk) 02:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
To add to this article: mention of her travel via state private plane to right-wing political events, and her application to purchase a new $5 million dollar jet. 173.88.246.138 ( talk) 03:40, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
AP News: "Noem refuses to say whether Biden victory was free and fair" [1]. Text on this topic should be restored. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 13:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of respect for an IP user
174.254.200.18, I am proposing the deletion of the sentence in the subsection
Energy and Environment: "For this policy viewpoint, the online
Vice magazine in 2017 identified her as a climate change denier."
Looking for consensus here Several organizations and media outlets assign politicians certain titles, in this case "climate change denier." Not sure why this one is singled out here; this is the only content included in this section that coincides with the paragraph topic.
I would also propose removing that particular paragraph (first paragraph) from this subsection, as it pertains to one singular vote without detailed explanation. The paragraph exclusively relies on the text of the legislation per the Vice citation. The other paragraphs in this subsection cite more than just the text of legislation, including:
While Noem has taken thousands of votes during her congressional tenure;
cherry picking one singular vote without additional content does not seem worth including. If there were further supporting evidence of this stance, it would be appropriate to keep this paragraph.
19:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
The only arguable thing about the quote around Georgia senators is whether it should be in the 2020 election section. Arguably you could create another section for it but it doesn't really seem necessary. there are certainly no WP:ONUS or WP:NOTNEWS issues. Pipsally NLI. 86.99.87.85 ( talk) 08:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Kristi Noem has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
You should not state that the election fraud claims were "false" when the attempt to prove differently was denied. The condition of the election fraud remains indeterminate. 72.240.132.153 ( talk) 09:50, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Dear wikipedia. The article mentions that Kristi backed President Donald Trump without any evidence. This is a lie. There was evidence. Affidavits are evidence. What you are thinking of is "proof". Proof is something determined in court. However since the court-cases were thrown out there was no chance to prove or disprove anything. So please change the "evidence" in to "proof" in this article.Thronedrei (talk) 11:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thronedrei ( talk • contribs)
Strong Support Wikipedia's political bias is objectively apparent regarding politicians, political parties and politically charged events. The statement, "Elected as an ally of Donald Trump, Noem consistently backed his agenda." contains irrefutable evidence of bias. The two sources cited as evidence of the statement are Argus Leader and Rolling Stone magazine. The titles of these articles are "Trump blasts Sutton and media, raves about Noem during South Dakota visit" and The Covid Queen of South Dakota Gov Kristi Noem’s state has been ravaged by her Trumpian response to the pandemic — but that hasn’t paused her national ambitions. If political bias is not apparent and evidence is, please show us. If Wikipedia is to become another politically charged chat forum, let it be known publicly. ( talk) 23:20, 9 July 2021 (UTC) CanadianUSLawCQEJLRMMO
It is very odd only to tell what Noem said or did during the pandemic (which continues) and not what the effect of her actions have been: a disproportionately high number of cases and deaths in the state compared to areas that followed more public health guidelines. Residents in South Dakota have suffered great losses because of her policies. Parkwells ( talk) 17:18, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
I think most people can agree that this is probably a better picture for the infobox. I would change it, but my account is too new. Guy13932 ( talk) 16:33, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
The current photo is a pretty nasty trick guys. You're obviously smart enough to know what you're doing and-- it's kind of funny-- but should be changed. 65.215.37.242 ( talk) 06:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Kristi Noem has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add a section, regarding a national news story with references
In June 2021, Noem announced that she as sending members of the South Dakota National Guard to the Texas border with Mexico. [1] Tennessee billionaire Willis Johnson and his wife Reba said they would donate the money necessary for the deployment. [2]
In September 2021, the Center for Public Integrity sued the U.S. Department of Defense and the South Dakota National Guard for documents related to the mobilization and the donation to pay for it. [3] ElmerHansen ( talk) 13:15, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
References
I understand that you want to put some of the most notable actions at the lead, but I would suggest re-writing it to read less like a modern tabloid and more like an encyclopedia. This is a problem that has gotten really out of hand on Wiki, but you're writing history ( if you take this project seriously) and it's important to not seem like you are leaning heavily in one polticial direction and villainizing the subject on a controversial issue. During a time with no central leadership during the pandemic, Noem chose to handle the situation differently than what Fauci was recommending. While noteworthy, it's not heresey. 65.215.37.242 ( talk) 06:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Including this heading, as the first item under her tenure as governor seems like a violation of WP:NPOV. If her administration was marked by conflict or disfunction, that can be discussed. Absent that, I think we are tossing innuendo. Peter Chastain [¡hablá!] 00:58, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Don’t mention any of the positives she has done .. focus only on the cdc and NIH narratives for covid.... good job ..... 2601:545:8001:9080:B052:9970:30DD:4FE8 ( talk) 10:21, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
What an awesome way to tell you a little bit about a female in power. Ridiculous trash. Ally of Trump apparently means you are a bad person. For the record, her state has had fantastic numbers on Covid stats as bad as the media and this trash website doesn’t want to admit it. All of this as democrat allies cozy up with child molesters. Keep up the fantastic brainwashing work Wikipedia. 2600:100C:B03A:837C:39E7:B525:76F6:7E8C ( talk) 16:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
The introduction is laughably biased against the governor. It’s horseshit.
2600:1700:38C1:3BF0:6453:C026:D03B:2AAF ( talk) 04:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Kristy Noem / farmer versus Rancher ==
Kristy Noem is in no way a Rancher. She barely qualifies as a farmer as her extended family operates a small farm/pheasant hunting lodge in Eastern South Dakota. There is a huge difference between a true Rancher and a small farmer. Kristy Noem could sort of be considered the later A "farm owner" . She is not and has never been a "rodeo cowgirl". She has never been a contestant in any rodeo. Anyone can put on western clothes and lope around on a horse with a flag, but that far from makes them a rodeo cowgirl. In truth, if that person has never contested in a rodeo, using sports lingo, it makes them a "wanta be". Voodoodomino ( talk) 17:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
What is wrong with you? This is why no one donates to you. 2603:7080:8F01:BA97:6813:34AA:F5C9:5B17 ( talk) 02:10, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
After just reading a bio on someone it's clear Wikipedia is biased in the presentation of facts, or should I say misinformation. 2603:6081:4907:2700:8D29:D1B3:EB23:9357 ( talk) 03:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
HEre's one.
"Elected as an ally of Donald Trump,[2]" she was elected before trump mattered. Bias.
"Noem explicitly refused to follow the guidance of medical experts during the COVID-19 pandemic, and did not enact any of the standard public health and safety protections used in other states.[3][4] She did not implement face mask mandates, raised doubts about the efficacy of mask-wearing, encouraged large gatherings without social distancing or mask-wearing, and questioned public health experts' advice.[5][6][7]"
None of this is relevant to Noem. South Dakota, maybe, but not Noem. And by the way, you should have also added that SD ended up with the lowest cases/deaths because of it, and that she ended up being RIGHT. But you won't, because of your obvious bias. This site gets more pathetic and useless every day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7000:1341:3100:BDB6:9BDD:33B0:B0E3 ( talk) 21:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
You are wrong. South Dakota did not end up with anywhere near the lowest Covid positivity rates or deaths if you look at the numbers correctly. They may have been lower in the actual number but you have to look at how many people actually live in the state to make a state to state comparison. Voodoodomino ( talk) 18:58, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Reads like a political hit piece, not an encyclopedia article. The first paragraph attacks her covid policies but fails to mention south Dakota's death rate is more or less in the middle of US states. 98.220.81.214 ( talk) 03:00, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Covid numbers and Death rate were during many long periods of time, at the top of the list compared to other states! And should not have been if handled properly as SD is a very rural state with a very spare population spread out in the state. It would have been so easy to control contact and minimize numbers, again if it had been handled properly! Voodoodomino ( talk) 18:54, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
The statement that Kristi Noem would require a 10-year-old to have a baby is factually incorrect. She never said that. Rather, when pressed by Dana Bash if a 10-year-old was physically able to have a baby without endangering her life, wouldn't she be allowed to have an abortion under current law, Noem said that discussion would be had by the family and doctors, implying that if it was determined that if the 10-year-old's life was in jeopardy she could have an abortion under current law. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.4.251.180 ( talk) 22:14, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
In the "Conflict of interest action to professionally benefit daughter" segment.
Paragraph currently reads: Noem's spokesperson Ian Fury... Noem... Fury contended... Critics... Noem's... Hunter Biden... father...
It would be much more readable if Noem's, Fury's, and Critics' remarks were pulled out into separate paragraphs. 2601:1C1:C100:9380:0:0:0:F36 ( talk) 06:50, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 02:52, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
The picture currently displayed at the top of this article had me immediately scanning the article for a discussion of how "her face was horribly scarred in a fire", or "a catastrophic plastic surgery misadventure", etc.
Yes, make-up can be used to hide a lot but with the 3 pictures available it is reasonable to wonder why the worst picture, by far, was selected to be at the very top.
However controversial her politics, the _appearance_ of maliciously highlighting what is probably among the worst of thousands of photos and probably dozens available under Wikipedia acceptable rules, seems exactly the kind of thing that a boat load of policies regarding articles about living persons would be intended to prevent.
This, the current banner pic, looks like something from a monster movie. /info/en/?search=File:Kristi_Noem_(50364970323)_(cropped).jpg
Both of these look much better. /info/en/?search=File:Kristi_Noem_portrait_(cropped).jpg /info/en/?search=File:Kristi_Noem_1.jpg
2601:1C1:C100:9380:0:0:0:F36 ( talk) 07:08, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
I'm concerned that recent editing has changed the POV in the article based upon editors' OR rather than references. -- Hipal ( talk) 18:11, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
And edit-warring over it doesn't improve the situation [2] [3] [4] -- Hipal ( talk) 17:52, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
The cancelation of the pipeline “[signaled] to the world that American energy independence is no longer a priority,”[92] Noem wrote, later saying in an interview that President Biden gave Putin “all the power” by canceling the pipeline, arguing that it enabled Russia to invade Ukraine.[93]This is an opinion which is properly attributed to Ms Noem, so if there's a POV it's hers and that's okay, and there are references, and I don't see how it's original research. Peter Gulutzan ( talk) 18:45, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
"She completed her degree in political science at SDSU in 2012" - What does it mean exactly/concretly ? Bachelor (B.A.) or Master (M.A.) ? Best regards, European (Germany) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:9E8:20C5:EC00:851F:A13D:BD2B:20B3 ( talk) 13:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Kristi Noem has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There should be an addition regarding her past legal troubles, specifically around driving:
"Noem has been ticketed more than 20 times for driving offenses, and two bench warrants were issued for her arrest. She was never arrested or jailed and has paid all her fines."
"Noem's most recent violation, according to records kept by the South Dakota Unified Judicial System, was driving 94 mph in a 75 mph zone on Interstate 29 in Moody County. She paid $130 in fines and court costs for that ticket on Feb. 19, a few days after she officially announced her campaign for the U.S. House of Representatives.
State records going back to November 1989 show Noem with a total of 28 citations: 20 speeding tickets plus two violations for failure to stop at an intersection, two for not wearing a seat belt and two for having expired plates on her vehicle and one each for not having her driver's license with her and not renewing her vehicle registration.
Noem also has been sent six reminder notices and had two warrants issued for overdue fines, which she later settled. Her fines have totaled about $2,100."
"On Feb. 2, 2000, the Beadle County Clerk of Courts had a bench warrant issued for Noem's arrest for not paying a $68 fine for driving 74 mph in a 65 mph zone. Ann Hazuka, a deputy clerk, said that's a "pretty normal practice."
"When she failed to appear in court on Feb. 28, she was sent a reminder letter telling her to pay the fine by March 13. When she did not, according to the office, the bench warrant was issued on March 14, 2006. Noem finally paid a $20 fine."
Source: https://www.mitchellrepublic.com/news/noems-driving-record-takes-wheel-of-campaign GregLstl ( talk) 17:36, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
{{
Edit semi-protected}}
template. A local news piece about non-criminal traffic violations does not seem to establish
WP:DUEWEIGHT for nearly that much prose.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
15:39, 19 April 2023 (UTC)This
edit request to
Kristi Noem has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Why is there no mention of Noem’s years long affair with Trump advisor, Corey Lewandowski? This is a FACT and should be added. 67.86.45.195 ( talk) 21:06, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Kristi Noem has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the rumor about affair as it shows this is a political hack snd clearly not objective. Take it down. 2601:280:5901:2AD0:B03B:90AC:F031:2A7 ( talk) 03:55, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Not done for now: please establish a
consensus for this alteration
before using the {{
Edit semi-protected}}
template.
Seawolf35 (
talk)
05:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
I believe this subject would be a relevant addition to her wiki. Tmath250 ( talk) 16:33, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Sentence 3 of 'Dog shooting controversy' 147.26.87.113 ( talk) 21:17, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Kristi Noem has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In her autobiography she relates an incident wherein she was unable to train her 14month old German wirehair pointer puppy, and as a result, shot it in the head; along with a goat.
[1] [2] 72.94.145.164 ( talk) 02:09, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
== Appears to be information missing from personal life. == Has been moved to new section. Under Guns.
References
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/south-dakota-gov-kristi-noem-continues-defend-shooting-familys-dog-rcna150331 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13375241/kristi-noem-dog-shooting-fake-news-puppy-livestock.html https://ca.news.yahoo.com/d-gov-kristi-noem-defends-155218425.html
I don't know which publications are WP approved. 2604:2D80:5907:C400:F9F1:AFC5:3BDC:B240 ( talk) 20:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Kristi Noem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.keloland.com/News/NewsDetail6371.cfm?Id=131032When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:51, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
The text, or link, of her speech should be included in article. Wikipietime ( talk) 14:35, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
I sourced a critique of a coronavirus study to RT and clearly identified it as a source of propaganda, not to be taken as fact. Activist ( talk) 00:16, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
The manual of style calls for a portrait image, and asks that the best quality of image be used, as indicated in the manual of style under Image quality.
See articles on Diane Feinstein and Elizabeth Warren for examples of proper image selection. Gunbirddriver ( talk) 22:11, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The choice of picture reveals a great deal about the person who selected it. Kristi is a beautiful so the selected picture appears to have been doctored. It doesn't look like her at all.
Gosh, I wonder what could have motivated such petty meanness.
The choice of picture reveals a great deal about the person who selected it. Kristi is a beautiful so the selected picture appears to have been doctored. It doesn't look like her at all.
Gosh, I wonder what could have motivated such petty meanness.
@ PFVF: I'm about to revert your edit for a second time. Its relevance to the article is dubious (see WP:NOTNEWS), it seems to espouse a point of view (see WP:NPOV), and as I said in my previous edit summary, the grammar and wording make it very difficult to understand. Because you have reverted the removal of your edit three times and been warned on your talk page, this is likely considered a WP:EDITWAR. Please be aware that I am attempting to resolve the issue on this talk page, and that adding back your edit without discussion may lead to a block for edit warring. ezlev signed this. talk 21:33, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
@Ezlev, I am brand new to Wikipedia. I don't know the procedures, which you obviously do as you harass me with all the buzz words and strong-arm tactics of a bully. What I do know, however, is that you consider yourself a grammar cop while you make pompous "grammar correction" edits that introduce grammatical errors where none existed! You also show no understanding of the difference between grammar and style. But, most importantly, you show evidence of someone too ignorant to know how ignorant she is. I don't know why you want to leave standing an attribution to Governor Noem that is obsolete -- that she no longer believes, and that she specifically has updated -- but your refusal to allow the update is VANDALISM. Such vandalism does not further the mission of Wikipedia to increase understanding (in this case of Governor Noem's own statements about international trade, particularly the China trade agreement and its benefits to American agriculture) in truth.
I don't know all the procedures to warn you to stop (in all of your personalities) because I am new here, and I haven't hung out at Wikipedia as you obviously do. But, if you persist, I will find out how to get as many of your abusive, harassing, obstructionist personalities blocked as I can. PFVF ( talk) 01:33, 9 November 2020 (UTC)PFVF
@Ezlev, content is everything, especially when it is quotations from the subject of the Wiki page on the matter at hand; the Governor's viewpoint is totally germane! Also, I would ask in future -- after noting the proliferation of grammatical and punctuation errors in this reply of yours -- that you show more care in deeming to "correct" others' grammar. Please take the time to LISTEN, to hear, and to read references before you claim something is "unreadable." Maybe you don't understand because you don't comprehend, rather than because you bear animus. We'll see. PFVF ( talk) 03:24, 9 November 2020 (UTC)PFVF
@ Snooganssnoogans: could you explain your recent deletion of 1710 bytes from the article? Elizium23 ( talk) 02:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
To add to this article: mention of her travel via state private plane to right-wing political events, and her application to purchase a new $5 million dollar jet. 173.88.246.138 ( talk) 03:40, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
AP News: "Noem refuses to say whether Biden victory was free and fair" [1]. Text on this topic should be restored. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 13:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of respect for an IP user
174.254.200.18, I am proposing the deletion of the sentence in the subsection
Energy and Environment: "For this policy viewpoint, the online
Vice magazine in 2017 identified her as a climate change denier."
Looking for consensus here Several organizations and media outlets assign politicians certain titles, in this case "climate change denier." Not sure why this one is singled out here; this is the only content included in this section that coincides with the paragraph topic.
I would also propose removing that particular paragraph (first paragraph) from this subsection, as it pertains to one singular vote without detailed explanation. The paragraph exclusively relies on the text of the legislation per the Vice citation. The other paragraphs in this subsection cite more than just the text of legislation, including:
While Noem has taken thousands of votes during her congressional tenure;
cherry picking one singular vote without additional content does not seem worth including. If there were further supporting evidence of this stance, it would be appropriate to keep this paragraph.
19:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
The only arguable thing about the quote around Georgia senators is whether it should be in the 2020 election section. Arguably you could create another section for it but it doesn't really seem necessary. there are certainly no WP:ONUS or WP:NOTNEWS issues. Pipsally NLI. 86.99.87.85 ( talk) 08:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Kristi Noem has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
You should not state that the election fraud claims were "false" when the attempt to prove differently was denied. The condition of the election fraud remains indeterminate. 72.240.132.153 ( talk) 09:50, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Dear wikipedia. The article mentions that Kristi backed President Donald Trump without any evidence. This is a lie. There was evidence. Affidavits are evidence. What you are thinking of is "proof". Proof is something determined in court. However since the court-cases were thrown out there was no chance to prove or disprove anything. So please change the "evidence" in to "proof" in this article.Thronedrei (talk) 11:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thronedrei ( talk • contribs)
Strong Support Wikipedia's political bias is objectively apparent regarding politicians, political parties and politically charged events. The statement, "Elected as an ally of Donald Trump, Noem consistently backed his agenda." contains irrefutable evidence of bias. The two sources cited as evidence of the statement are Argus Leader and Rolling Stone magazine. The titles of these articles are "Trump blasts Sutton and media, raves about Noem during South Dakota visit" and The Covid Queen of South Dakota Gov Kristi Noem’s state has been ravaged by her Trumpian response to the pandemic — but that hasn’t paused her national ambitions. If political bias is not apparent and evidence is, please show us. If Wikipedia is to become another politically charged chat forum, let it be known publicly. ( talk) 23:20, 9 July 2021 (UTC) CanadianUSLawCQEJLRMMO
It is very odd only to tell what Noem said or did during the pandemic (which continues) and not what the effect of her actions have been: a disproportionately high number of cases and deaths in the state compared to areas that followed more public health guidelines. Residents in South Dakota have suffered great losses because of her policies. Parkwells ( talk) 17:18, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
I think most people can agree that this is probably a better picture for the infobox. I would change it, but my account is too new. Guy13932 ( talk) 16:33, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
The current photo is a pretty nasty trick guys. You're obviously smart enough to know what you're doing and-- it's kind of funny-- but should be changed. 65.215.37.242 ( talk) 06:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Kristi Noem has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add a section, regarding a national news story with references
In June 2021, Noem announced that she as sending members of the South Dakota National Guard to the Texas border with Mexico. [1] Tennessee billionaire Willis Johnson and his wife Reba said they would donate the money necessary for the deployment. [2]
In September 2021, the Center for Public Integrity sued the U.S. Department of Defense and the South Dakota National Guard for documents related to the mobilization and the donation to pay for it. [3] ElmerHansen ( talk) 13:15, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
References
I understand that you want to put some of the most notable actions at the lead, but I would suggest re-writing it to read less like a modern tabloid and more like an encyclopedia. This is a problem that has gotten really out of hand on Wiki, but you're writing history ( if you take this project seriously) and it's important to not seem like you are leaning heavily in one polticial direction and villainizing the subject on a controversial issue. During a time with no central leadership during the pandemic, Noem chose to handle the situation differently than what Fauci was recommending. While noteworthy, it's not heresey. 65.215.37.242 ( talk) 06:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Including this heading, as the first item under her tenure as governor seems like a violation of WP:NPOV. If her administration was marked by conflict or disfunction, that can be discussed. Absent that, I think we are tossing innuendo. Peter Chastain [¡hablá!] 00:58, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Don’t mention any of the positives she has done .. focus only on the cdc and NIH narratives for covid.... good job ..... 2601:545:8001:9080:B052:9970:30DD:4FE8 ( talk) 10:21, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
What an awesome way to tell you a little bit about a female in power. Ridiculous trash. Ally of Trump apparently means you are a bad person. For the record, her state has had fantastic numbers on Covid stats as bad as the media and this trash website doesn’t want to admit it. All of this as democrat allies cozy up with child molesters. Keep up the fantastic brainwashing work Wikipedia. 2600:100C:B03A:837C:39E7:B525:76F6:7E8C ( talk) 16:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
The introduction is laughably biased against the governor. It’s horseshit.
2600:1700:38C1:3BF0:6453:C026:D03B:2AAF ( talk) 04:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Kristy Noem / farmer versus Rancher ==
Kristy Noem is in no way a Rancher. She barely qualifies as a farmer as her extended family operates a small farm/pheasant hunting lodge in Eastern South Dakota. There is a huge difference between a true Rancher and a small farmer. Kristy Noem could sort of be considered the later A "farm owner" . She is not and has never been a "rodeo cowgirl". She has never been a contestant in any rodeo. Anyone can put on western clothes and lope around on a horse with a flag, but that far from makes them a rodeo cowgirl. In truth, if that person has never contested in a rodeo, using sports lingo, it makes them a "wanta be". Voodoodomino ( talk) 17:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
What is wrong with you? This is why no one donates to you. 2603:7080:8F01:BA97:6813:34AA:F5C9:5B17 ( talk) 02:10, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
After just reading a bio on someone it's clear Wikipedia is biased in the presentation of facts, or should I say misinformation. 2603:6081:4907:2700:8D29:D1B3:EB23:9357 ( talk) 03:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
HEre's one.
"Elected as an ally of Donald Trump,[2]" she was elected before trump mattered. Bias.
"Noem explicitly refused to follow the guidance of medical experts during the COVID-19 pandemic, and did not enact any of the standard public health and safety protections used in other states.[3][4] She did not implement face mask mandates, raised doubts about the efficacy of mask-wearing, encouraged large gatherings without social distancing or mask-wearing, and questioned public health experts' advice.[5][6][7]"
None of this is relevant to Noem. South Dakota, maybe, but not Noem. And by the way, you should have also added that SD ended up with the lowest cases/deaths because of it, and that she ended up being RIGHT. But you won't, because of your obvious bias. This site gets more pathetic and useless every day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7000:1341:3100:BDB6:9BDD:33B0:B0E3 ( talk) 21:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
You are wrong. South Dakota did not end up with anywhere near the lowest Covid positivity rates or deaths if you look at the numbers correctly. They may have been lower in the actual number but you have to look at how many people actually live in the state to make a state to state comparison. Voodoodomino ( talk) 18:58, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Reads like a political hit piece, not an encyclopedia article. The first paragraph attacks her covid policies but fails to mention south Dakota's death rate is more or less in the middle of US states. 98.220.81.214 ( talk) 03:00, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Covid numbers and Death rate were during many long periods of time, at the top of the list compared to other states! And should not have been if handled properly as SD is a very rural state with a very spare population spread out in the state. It would have been so easy to control contact and minimize numbers, again if it had been handled properly! Voodoodomino ( talk) 18:54, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
The statement that Kristi Noem would require a 10-year-old to have a baby is factually incorrect. She never said that. Rather, when pressed by Dana Bash if a 10-year-old was physically able to have a baby without endangering her life, wouldn't she be allowed to have an abortion under current law, Noem said that discussion would be had by the family and doctors, implying that if it was determined that if the 10-year-old's life was in jeopardy she could have an abortion under current law. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.4.251.180 ( talk) 22:14, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
In the "Conflict of interest action to professionally benefit daughter" segment.
Paragraph currently reads: Noem's spokesperson Ian Fury... Noem... Fury contended... Critics... Noem's... Hunter Biden... father...
It would be much more readable if Noem's, Fury's, and Critics' remarks were pulled out into separate paragraphs. 2601:1C1:C100:9380:0:0:0:F36 ( talk) 06:50, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 02:52, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
The picture currently displayed at the top of this article had me immediately scanning the article for a discussion of how "her face was horribly scarred in a fire", or "a catastrophic plastic surgery misadventure", etc.
Yes, make-up can be used to hide a lot but with the 3 pictures available it is reasonable to wonder why the worst picture, by far, was selected to be at the very top.
However controversial her politics, the _appearance_ of maliciously highlighting what is probably among the worst of thousands of photos and probably dozens available under Wikipedia acceptable rules, seems exactly the kind of thing that a boat load of policies regarding articles about living persons would be intended to prevent.
This, the current banner pic, looks like something from a monster movie. /info/en/?search=File:Kristi_Noem_(50364970323)_(cropped).jpg
Both of these look much better. /info/en/?search=File:Kristi_Noem_portrait_(cropped).jpg /info/en/?search=File:Kristi_Noem_1.jpg
2601:1C1:C100:9380:0:0:0:F36 ( talk) 07:08, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
I'm concerned that recent editing has changed the POV in the article based upon editors' OR rather than references. -- Hipal ( talk) 18:11, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
And edit-warring over it doesn't improve the situation [2] [3] [4] -- Hipal ( talk) 17:52, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
The cancelation of the pipeline “[signaled] to the world that American energy independence is no longer a priority,”[92] Noem wrote, later saying in an interview that President Biden gave Putin “all the power” by canceling the pipeline, arguing that it enabled Russia to invade Ukraine.[93]This is an opinion which is properly attributed to Ms Noem, so if there's a POV it's hers and that's okay, and there are references, and I don't see how it's original research. Peter Gulutzan ( talk) 18:45, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
"She completed her degree in political science at SDSU in 2012" - What does it mean exactly/concretly ? Bachelor (B.A.) or Master (M.A.) ? Best regards, European (Germany) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:9E8:20C5:EC00:851F:A13D:BD2B:20B3 ( talk) 13:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Kristi Noem has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There should be an addition regarding her past legal troubles, specifically around driving:
"Noem has been ticketed more than 20 times for driving offenses, and two bench warrants were issued for her arrest. She was never arrested or jailed and has paid all her fines."
"Noem's most recent violation, according to records kept by the South Dakota Unified Judicial System, was driving 94 mph in a 75 mph zone on Interstate 29 in Moody County. She paid $130 in fines and court costs for that ticket on Feb. 19, a few days after she officially announced her campaign for the U.S. House of Representatives.
State records going back to November 1989 show Noem with a total of 28 citations: 20 speeding tickets plus two violations for failure to stop at an intersection, two for not wearing a seat belt and two for having expired plates on her vehicle and one each for not having her driver's license with her and not renewing her vehicle registration.
Noem also has been sent six reminder notices and had two warrants issued for overdue fines, which she later settled. Her fines have totaled about $2,100."
"On Feb. 2, 2000, the Beadle County Clerk of Courts had a bench warrant issued for Noem's arrest for not paying a $68 fine for driving 74 mph in a 65 mph zone. Ann Hazuka, a deputy clerk, said that's a "pretty normal practice."
"When she failed to appear in court on Feb. 28, she was sent a reminder letter telling her to pay the fine by March 13. When she did not, according to the office, the bench warrant was issued on March 14, 2006. Noem finally paid a $20 fine."
Source: https://www.mitchellrepublic.com/news/noems-driving-record-takes-wheel-of-campaign GregLstl ( talk) 17:36, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
{{
Edit semi-protected}}
template. A local news piece about non-criminal traffic violations does not seem to establish
WP:DUEWEIGHT for nearly that much prose.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
15:39, 19 April 2023 (UTC)This
edit request to
Kristi Noem has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Why is there no mention of Noem’s years long affair with Trump advisor, Corey Lewandowski? This is a FACT and should be added. 67.86.45.195 ( talk) 21:06, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Kristi Noem has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the rumor about affair as it shows this is a political hack snd clearly not objective. Take it down. 2601:280:5901:2AD0:B03B:90AC:F031:2A7 ( talk) 03:55, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Not done for now: please establish a
consensus for this alteration
before using the {{
Edit semi-protected}}
template.
Seawolf35 (
talk)
05:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
I believe this subject would be a relevant addition to her wiki. Tmath250 ( talk) 16:33, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Sentence 3 of 'Dog shooting controversy' 147.26.87.113 ( talk) 21:17, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Kristi Noem has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In her autobiography she relates an incident wherein she was unable to train her 14month old German wirehair pointer puppy, and as a result, shot it in the head; along with a goat.
[1] [2] 72.94.145.164 ( talk) 02:09, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
== Appears to be information missing from personal life. == Has been moved to new section. Under Guns.
References
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/south-dakota-gov-kristi-noem-continues-defend-shooting-familys-dog-rcna150331 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13375241/kristi-noem-dog-shooting-fake-news-puppy-livestock.html https://ca.news.yahoo.com/d-gov-kristi-noem-defends-155218425.html
I don't know which publications are WP approved. 2604:2D80:5907:C400:F9F1:AFC5:3BDC:B240 ( talk) 20:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)