This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Koper article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
> Similar to nearby Trieste, there is a fair number of native-speaking Germans in the region.
is that information confirmed?
Slovenin: No, the information is not correct. There were 30 in 1991 according to Austrian research data (Stefan Karner, Die deutschspachige Volksgruppe in Slowenien, Verlag Hermagoras/Mohorjeva, Klagenfurt - Ljubljana - Wien 1998, p. 175). Thus this is the maximum figure though there are probably less.
The result of the debate was Move. A debate on another article's name has no bearing on this article's name. — Wknight94 ( talk) 19:14, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Koper - Capodistria → Koper – The official name is Koper or Capodistria, not both simultaneously. See Luxembourg (city) and Helsinki for similar cases. - AjaxSmack 22:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Please note that the correct italian name of Koper is Capo d'Istria instead; Capodistria is how it is spoken. user ^Kihten^ 17 dec 2008 11:01 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.96.138.15 ( talk) 10:01, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
Add any additional comments
I've removed the move tag. It's useless to open a new discussion. There are some general rules, and there is another similar discussion abput South Tyrol- Alto Adige. There is no need to open a parallel discussion on the same topic. It's enough to see the develop of the South Tyrol discussion, it will generate a new standard. Furthemore, a specific dicussion about Koper-Capodistria, could be affected by nationalistic ideas. If somebody it is interested in the problem, he can join the discussion in the Alto Adige/South Tyrol articles. -- Giovanni Giove 15:39, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
I propose again to move the discussion to [1]. It is useless to adopt different standards for different articles. The discussion about South Tyrol can became a discussion about the standard for all multilingual zones.-- Giovanni Giove 21:59, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
See the next point. -- Giovanni Giove 12:05, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
I propose to stop any discussion, and to adopt the standard of South Tyrol or Bolzano/Bozen, when a solution will be reached there.-- Giovanni Giove 12:05, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Per this talk I have removed the following text from the article as pov and not properly referenced: "During the period of the Austrian Empire, Koper was, along with Trieste, part of the Austrian Littoral crown land. Before World War I, the city had a population of 87% Italians and 5% Slovenes. In 1921 there was 51% Italians, 33% Slovenes, 15% Croats and in 1936 49% Italians, 35% Slovenes and 15% Croats. [1]" -- Eleassar my talk 18:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
It seems that there is a transition taking place in the naming of the place in the English language, for example Britannica now names it Koper but the 1911 edition names it Capodistria. But a Google shows that this transition is not complete in English Language sources, as some sources still call it Capodistria.
I have put in a footnote to mention that the town is named 3 ways in English language sources: Koper, Capodistria and Koper-Capodistria. This will help with internet searches and it informs people who arrive here looking for more information on Capodistria that it is still a valid alternative name in English.-- PBS ( talk) 09:53, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Koper | |
---|---|
City | |
City of Koper Mesto Koper - Città di Capodistria |
"Koper-Capodistria" is a non-existent settlement. No such place exists. Its either Koper or Capodistria. I hereby propose the infobox solution implemented for bilingual municipalities and towns in the rest of Istria to be implemented in Slovene Istria as well, and a suitable standard agreed-upon. The current situation where readers are given the impression that the town's name ("Koper-Capodistria") is composed of two words, such as Efringen-Kirchen or Mazerat-Aurouze is not in the interest of encyclopedic accuracy. I invite all Users interested in this discussion to please read, or at least skim-through, the consensus on the rest of Istrian bilingual municipalities so as to avoid repetition. The situation in Slovene bilingual municipalities is virtually identical to the one discussed there. I recently added the flag and coat of arms, and would like to finish the infobox fix :). Here enclosed is an example of what has been agreed upon, regards -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 15:15, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Well certainly, its a "free encyclopedia" isn't it? :-D In fact, I'll do it myself if there are no objections? Of course, I'm looking to apply the agreement fully... -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 17:07, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Seriously, are there any objections? -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 08:24, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Koper. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Koper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:50, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Koper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Koper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://72.30.186.56/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&p=Saint+John%27s+sister+cities&type=yahoo_avg_hs2-tb-web_chrome_us&fr=yhs-avg-chrome&u=clevelandslovenian.com%2F&w=saint+john%27s+john+sister+cities&d=dDjhxhlMTA7T&icp=1&.intl=usWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:31, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
The opening para and the infobox give the population figure as c. 25K, the 'Demographics' section as 47K. What's behind this difference, does anyone know? -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 10:09, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Koper article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
> Similar to nearby Trieste, there is a fair number of native-speaking Germans in the region.
is that information confirmed?
Slovenin: No, the information is not correct. There were 30 in 1991 according to Austrian research data (Stefan Karner, Die deutschspachige Volksgruppe in Slowenien, Verlag Hermagoras/Mohorjeva, Klagenfurt - Ljubljana - Wien 1998, p. 175). Thus this is the maximum figure though there are probably less.
The result of the debate was Move. A debate on another article's name has no bearing on this article's name. — Wknight94 ( talk) 19:14, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Koper - Capodistria → Koper – The official name is Koper or Capodistria, not both simultaneously. See Luxembourg (city) and Helsinki for similar cases. - AjaxSmack 22:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Please note that the correct italian name of Koper is Capo d'Istria instead; Capodistria is how it is spoken. user ^Kihten^ 17 dec 2008 11:01 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.96.138.15 ( talk) 10:01, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
Add any additional comments
I've removed the move tag. It's useless to open a new discussion. There are some general rules, and there is another similar discussion abput South Tyrol- Alto Adige. There is no need to open a parallel discussion on the same topic. It's enough to see the develop of the South Tyrol discussion, it will generate a new standard. Furthemore, a specific dicussion about Koper-Capodistria, could be affected by nationalistic ideas. If somebody it is interested in the problem, he can join the discussion in the Alto Adige/South Tyrol articles. -- Giovanni Giove 15:39, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
I propose again to move the discussion to [1]. It is useless to adopt different standards for different articles. The discussion about South Tyrol can became a discussion about the standard for all multilingual zones.-- Giovanni Giove 21:59, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
See the next point. -- Giovanni Giove 12:05, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
I propose to stop any discussion, and to adopt the standard of South Tyrol or Bolzano/Bozen, when a solution will be reached there.-- Giovanni Giove 12:05, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Per this talk I have removed the following text from the article as pov and not properly referenced: "During the period of the Austrian Empire, Koper was, along with Trieste, part of the Austrian Littoral crown land. Before World War I, the city had a population of 87% Italians and 5% Slovenes. In 1921 there was 51% Italians, 33% Slovenes, 15% Croats and in 1936 49% Italians, 35% Slovenes and 15% Croats. [1]" -- Eleassar my talk 18:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
It seems that there is a transition taking place in the naming of the place in the English language, for example Britannica now names it Koper but the 1911 edition names it Capodistria. But a Google shows that this transition is not complete in English Language sources, as some sources still call it Capodistria.
I have put in a footnote to mention that the town is named 3 ways in English language sources: Koper, Capodistria and Koper-Capodistria. This will help with internet searches and it informs people who arrive here looking for more information on Capodistria that it is still a valid alternative name in English.-- PBS ( talk) 09:53, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Koper | |
---|---|
City | |
City of Koper Mesto Koper - Città di Capodistria |
"Koper-Capodistria" is a non-existent settlement. No such place exists. Its either Koper or Capodistria. I hereby propose the infobox solution implemented for bilingual municipalities and towns in the rest of Istria to be implemented in Slovene Istria as well, and a suitable standard agreed-upon. The current situation where readers are given the impression that the town's name ("Koper-Capodistria") is composed of two words, such as Efringen-Kirchen or Mazerat-Aurouze is not in the interest of encyclopedic accuracy. I invite all Users interested in this discussion to please read, or at least skim-through, the consensus on the rest of Istrian bilingual municipalities so as to avoid repetition. The situation in Slovene bilingual municipalities is virtually identical to the one discussed there. I recently added the flag and coat of arms, and would like to finish the infobox fix :). Here enclosed is an example of what has been agreed upon, regards -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 15:15, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Well certainly, its a "free encyclopedia" isn't it? :-D In fact, I'll do it myself if there are no objections? Of course, I'm looking to apply the agreement fully... -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 17:07, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Seriously, are there any objections? -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 08:24, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Koper. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Koper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:50, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Koper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Koper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://72.30.186.56/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&p=Saint+John%27s+sister+cities&type=yahoo_avg_hs2-tb-web_chrome_us&fr=yhs-avg-chrome&u=clevelandslovenian.com%2F&w=saint+john%27s+john+sister+cities&d=dDjhxhlMTA7T&icp=1&.intl=usWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:31, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
The opening para and the infobox give the population figure as c. 25K, the 'Demographics' section as 47K. What's behind this difference, does anyone know? -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 10:09, 18 June 2020 (UTC)