Talk:Koestraat The page should be kept since its an informative page to all new students arriving in the upcoming years. All the data not referenced is from a first hand source, making it hard to reference
--wwouter 15:48, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- A couple of things:
- First hand sources are not appropriate, precisely because they cannot be referenced. Third-party, independent, reliable sources are required.
- In my view, the article does not give any information about why the building is notable. Has anything important ever happened there? Anyone important ever live there? Is the building architecturally significant?
- It's a load of nonsense. As are your contributions to other articles on halls of residence for this college. There were three or four criteria under which I could have nominated this. Stop adding ridiculous falsehoods to articles. -- Kateshortforbob talk 16:02, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- You take wikipedia very seriously, don't you? 145.100.126.193 ( talk) 17:40, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Your statements are very clear. We shall try and fix them as soon as possible. You must understand, Koestraat is an old building, 17th century style, which is unique for Middelburg due to bombardments around the city in the second world war. Believe it or not, but every saturday there is a single tour around the building.. Anyhow, we are very busy finding sources which will contribute to the page. I hope you will give us time to make changes and get references for the page. -- 145.100.125.86 ( talk) 00:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- I have added one source to the article and removed inaccurate information added recently. If there are additional sources indicating that this building is in any way notable, it would be useful if they could be added. I think the suggestion to merge the article is also worth considering if there is any substantial information to merge. -- Kateshortforbob talk 12:00, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Koestraat The page should be kept since its an informative page to all new students arriving in the upcoming years. All the data not referenced is from a first hand source, making it hard to reference
--wwouter 15:48, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- A couple of things:
- First hand sources are not appropriate, precisely because they cannot be referenced. Third-party, independent, reliable sources are required.
- In my view, the article does not give any information about why the building is notable. Has anything important ever happened there? Anyone important ever live there? Is the building architecturally significant?
- It's a load of nonsense. As are your contributions to other articles on halls of residence for this college. There were three or four criteria under which I could have nominated this. Stop adding ridiculous falsehoods to articles. -- Kateshortforbob talk 16:02, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- You take wikipedia very seriously, don't you? 145.100.126.193 ( talk) 17:40, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Your statements are very clear. We shall try and fix them as soon as possible. You must understand, Koestraat is an old building, 17th century style, which is unique for Middelburg due to bombardments around the city in the second world war. Believe it or not, but every saturday there is a single tour around the building.. Anyhow, we are very busy finding sources which will contribute to the page. I hope you will give us time to make changes and get references for the page. -- 145.100.125.86 ( talk) 00:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- I have added one source to the article and removed inaccurate information added recently. If there are additional sources indicating that this building is in any way notable, it would be useful if they could be added. I think the suggestion to merge the article is also worth considering if there is any substantial information to merge. -- Kateshortforbob talk 12:00, 19 November 2010 (UTC)