This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

BBC: Sitcoms Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by BBC Sitcoms Task Force. Tasks for WikiProject BBC: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary) Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland NPOV : Criticism of the BBC ( See comments) Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles Other : *Restructure the category Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC Return Dad's Army to a Good article. ( See comments) Reassess BBC following improvements to article. Comedy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Television: British / Episode coverage Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the British television task force. This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

The article says that the laughter from a live audience meant that viewers could not mistake it for a real chat show. Shouldn't this say that the laughter meant that they COULD mistake it for a real chat show? That's the sneaky/funny technique with The Day Today and so forth- that someone won't get it and will think that the absurdities are real, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.124.151.244 ( talk) 16:56, 26 March 2012 (UTC) reply

The spelling "Glenn Ponder" should be "Glen Ponder", as in one episode Alan points out that it is an anagram of "Porn Legend". 80.254.147.36 ( talk) 16:41, 18 June 2012 (UTC) reply

• even more minor pedantry: Alan doesn't point it out, 'Bridey McMahon' does. 46.140.88.133 ( talk) 20:15, 4 April 2016 (UTC) reply

The character's name is spelt "Glenn Ponder" quite clearly and unmistakably in the end credits. "In-Universe Original Research" at its best. 92.75.224.79 ( talk) 00:31, 17 November 2018 (UTC) reply