This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
there are two weak sources for this
wp:blp person and a lot of controversial detail, is he really notable for an article here, I am seeing an aspect of attack - one of the sources is imo very opinionated as well?
Govindaharihari (
talk)
05:43, 18 July 2015 (UTC)reply
The "attacking" source is well described as such in the article - one does not get the idea that this page is written to support the notion that he was a Stasi agent. The fact that
Focus magazine even feels the need to write an article accusing Huhn of being a Stasi collaborator should be enough to show notability. Mr.choppers | ✎ 13:09, 18 July 2015 (UTC)reply
If I had a ball in the game I would be bothered and agree with you but I haven't so I neutrally see this person as having very limited note and the page as an attack, imho, any other uninvolved person would agree with me
Govindaharihari (
talk)
15:20, 19 July 2015 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
there are two weak sources for this
wp:blp person and a lot of controversial detail, is he really notable for an article here, I am seeing an aspect of attack - one of the sources is imo very opinionated as well?
Govindaharihari (
talk)
05:43, 18 July 2015 (UTC)reply
The "attacking" source is well described as such in the article - one does not get the idea that this page is written to support the notion that he was a Stasi agent. The fact that
Focus magazine even feels the need to write an article accusing Huhn of being a Stasi collaborator should be enough to show notability. Mr.choppers | ✎ 13:09, 18 July 2015 (UTC)reply
If I had a ball in the game I would be bothered and agree with you but I haven't so I neutrally see this person as having very limited note and the page as an attack, imho, any other uninvolved person would agree with me
Govindaharihari (
talk)
15:20, 19 July 2015 (UTC)reply