This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sociology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Mathematics Mid‑priority This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale. Economics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text should be accessible at various levels of sophistication if possible

The King Effect, as it relates to national population distribution (and probably other variables as well), potentially might have considerable implications for future political and economic geography, and therefore in international relations ^[1] . It would be helpful if the text explaining it and stretched exponential distributions generally were written so that it was accessible to readers of different levels of mathematical sophistication. To wit: there should be a treatment that is authoritative, but at the "For Dummies" level to impart the basic ideas to non-mathematical readers, followed by a more professionally-oriented section for those able to grasp it.

Would this article be the place to briefly mention some of these implications in a new section, perhaps? -- FurnaldHall ( talk) 16:16, 21 October 2012 (UTC) reply