This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and contribute to the
discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Isn't there some rule about how many times you can revert something against what everyone says? It has clearly broken viewcount records, but Limm V insists on reverting recognition of such, 5 times now, because they don't like the source. Seems quite insane, to me, and surely there's a policy saying you shouldn't be doing that.
58.179.159.63 (
talk) 14:48, 7 April 2019 (UTC)reply
You shouldn't be adding unsourced numbers for five times in a row. Also there is
WP:KO/RS. The Wikiproject decided that is reliable and can be used. Wait for a proper source to confirm this!--Lirim | Talk 15:30, 7 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Blink. 6 times. Isn't there a
WP:3RR rule you are violating. And it wasn't just me you were reverting.
58.179.159.63 (
talk) 21:08, 7 April 2019 (UTC)reply
7 times you reverted. You're fighting with everyone, and you're wrong. They most definitely broke the records they are claimed to have broken. If you can't help to make this a good page, maybe you shouldn't be editing this page.
58.179.159.63 (
talk) 21:13, 7 April 2019 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and contribute to the
discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Isn't there some rule about how many times you can revert something against what everyone says? It has clearly broken viewcount records, but Limm V insists on reverting recognition of such, 5 times now, because they don't like the source. Seems quite insane, to me, and surely there's a policy saying you shouldn't be doing that.
58.179.159.63 (
talk) 14:48, 7 April 2019 (UTC)reply
You shouldn't be adding unsourced numbers for five times in a row. Also there is
WP:KO/RS. The Wikiproject decided that is reliable and can be used. Wait for a proper source to confirm this!--Lirim | Talk 15:30, 7 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Blink. 6 times. Isn't there a
WP:3RR rule you are violating. And it wasn't just me you were reverting.
58.179.159.63 (
talk) 21:08, 7 April 2019 (UTC)reply
7 times you reverted. You're fighting with everyone, and you're wrong. They most definitely broke the records they are claimed to have broken. If you can't help to make this a good page, maybe you shouldn't be editing this page.
58.179.159.63 (
talk) 21:13, 7 April 2019 (UTC)reply