This article was nominated for merging with Generation gap on 24 September 2022. The result of the discussion was merge. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 8 September 2022. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
The quote is incorrectly attributed: https://quoteinvestigator.com/2010/05/01/misbehave/ I don't have time to fix it myself right now. MatthewWilcox ( talk) 14:08, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
This article barely qualifies as a stub. And the colloquial phrase in the title is obscure because the concept is often expressed by synonyms (e.g., "young people nowadays" or the quasi-astrological typing of Gen-X, Gen-Y, etc.).
I don't see how any new content would differ from Generation Gap. Since there was a quick (limited?) vote not to delete, I suggest a merge to preserve what little content there is. Martindo ( talk) 12:01, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
This article was nominated for merging with Generation gap on 24 September 2022. The result of the discussion was merge. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 8 September 2022. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
The quote is incorrectly attributed: https://quoteinvestigator.com/2010/05/01/misbehave/ I don't have time to fix it myself right now. MatthewWilcox ( talk) 14:08, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
This article barely qualifies as a stub. And the colloquial phrase in the title is obscure because the concept is often expressed by synonyms (e.g., "young people nowadays" or the quasi-astrological typing of Gen-X, Gen-Y, etc.).
I don't see how any new content would differ from Generation Gap. Since there was a quick (limited?) vote not to delete, I suggest a merge to preserve what little content there is. Martindo ( talk) 12:01, 24 September 2022 (UTC)