![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
When two movies are released simultaneously I request I my fellow editors that we should put balanced views about them. In present case, it's only appropriate that MOVIE REVIEWS for both Raees and Kaabil are cited from similar sources. JPMEENA ( talk) 20:22, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
The film's cinematography received attention from critics, several of whom praised the wide sweeping shots used throughout the dance sequences. "Brilliant," said John Doe of ABC Times, who gave the film 3 stars out of 5. "I felt as though I was flying." Rory Sen of DEF Bugle wrote, "I was transported to the crisp verdant hills of Switzerland. The techniques used by Salman Croix were astounding." These sentiments were not felt by Roy Smythe of DEF Times who described the photography as "dizzying ... I thought I was going to throw up. However, the acting was spot on and I found Mamta Bloggs to be believable and adorable." Bloggs' portrayal of the street urchin was described as "hilarious and lovable. I wanted to adopt her. Bloggs had amazing chemistry with Hrithik Jones, who did an excellent job of eliciting tears as the kind-hearted businessman."
In this edit I flagged the Critical response section for POV concerns. Recent edits to the article like this one from Vickymehta03 have reorganized the section to deliver the positive reviews at the top and the negative reviews at the bottom. This doesn't seem the smartest way to present the section, as we shouldn't be burying criticism or giving undue weight to positive reviews by stuffing them at the top. A more equal distribution of positive and negative reviews would be better than what's there, and even better than that, focusing on certain aspects like cinematography, writing, direction, acting, and presenting a balanced perspective about how various reviewers felt about each thing would be the smart way to go. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 20:35, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the feedback. I have tried reorganizing some of the reviews. Vickymehta03 ( talk) 06:41, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Kaabil's budget is not 60 Crore rupees but rather 50 Crore rupees. Verified from url link: http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/kaabil-raees-hrithik-roshan-shah-rukh-khan-4458986/ and another url http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/kaabil-box-office-collection-day-8-hrithik-roshan-4502773/
Another edit is regarding box office collection which is 150 Crores till Friday 3rd Feb 2017. Verified from url : http://www.firstpost.com/entertainment/bollywood/raees-vs-kaabil-box-office-collection-srk-film-at-245-cr-worldwide-hrithiks-at-150-cr-3264404.html Wikiwriter1985 ( talk) 03:45, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
i want to say one thing. kaabil has grossed over 205+ crore at the box office. but why wiki is not changing it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aminizum ( talk • contribs) 08:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
117.199.183.197 ( talk) 10:23, 18 March 2017 (UTC)LET ME EDIT
Not done: this is not the right page to
request additional
user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you. —
IVORK
Discuss
12:05, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
The box-office collection of kaabil mentioned in the page is lower than the actual figure.I want to fix this. Acash9934 ( talk) 09:35, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
actual figureand I can update it. Thanks. Vivek Ray ( talk) 11:04, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
One of the critics reviews, Saibal Chaterjee, called the movie Kaabil a paisa vasool, which I read in the reviews section. It said it needed clarification as to what it meant. I am fluent in Hindi and paisa vasool translates to 'waste of money,' which I think is the clarification needed. Thank you for reading this and I'm sorry if I did not understand what clarification was needed. Person2638 ( talk) 19:44, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
When two movies are released simultaneously I request I my fellow editors that we should put balanced views about them. In present case, it's only appropriate that MOVIE REVIEWS for both Raees and Kaabil are cited from similar sources. JPMEENA ( talk) 20:22, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
The film's cinematography received attention from critics, several of whom praised the wide sweeping shots used throughout the dance sequences. "Brilliant," said John Doe of ABC Times, who gave the film 3 stars out of 5. "I felt as though I was flying." Rory Sen of DEF Bugle wrote, "I was transported to the crisp verdant hills of Switzerland. The techniques used by Salman Croix were astounding." These sentiments were not felt by Roy Smythe of DEF Times who described the photography as "dizzying ... I thought I was going to throw up. However, the acting was spot on and I found Mamta Bloggs to be believable and adorable." Bloggs' portrayal of the street urchin was described as "hilarious and lovable. I wanted to adopt her. Bloggs had amazing chemistry with Hrithik Jones, who did an excellent job of eliciting tears as the kind-hearted businessman."
In this edit I flagged the Critical response section for POV concerns. Recent edits to the article like this one from Vickymehta03 have reorganized the section to deliver the positive reviews at the top and the negative reviews at the bottom. This doesn't seem the smartest way to present the section, as we shouldn't be burying criticism or giving undue weight to positive reviews by stuffing them at the top. A more equal distribution of positive and negative reviews would be better than what's there, and even better than that, focusing on certain aspects like cinematography, writing, direction, acting, and presenting a balanced perspective about how various reviewers felt about each thing would be the smart way to go. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 20:35, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the feedback. I have tried reorganizing some of the reviews. Vickymehta03 ( talk) 06:41, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Kaabil's budget is not 60 Crore rupees but rather 50 Crore rupees. Verified from url link: http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/kaabil-raees-hrithik-roshan-shah-rukh-khan-4458986/ and another url http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/kaabil-box-office-collection-day-8-hrithik-roshan-4502773/
Another edit is regarding box office collection which is 150 Crores till Friday 3rd Feb 2017. Verified from url : http://www.firstpost.com/entertainment/bollywood/raees-vs-kaabil-box-office-collection-srk-film-at-245-cr-worldwide-hrithiks-at-150-cr-3264404.html Wikiwriter1985 ( talk) 03:45, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
i want to say one thing. kaabil has grossed over 205+ crore at the box office. but why wiki is not changing it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aminizum ( talk • contribs) 08:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
117.199.183.197 ( talk) 10:23, 18 March 2017 (UTC)LET ME EDIT
Not done: this is not the right page to
request additional
user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you. —
IVORK
Discuss
12:05, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
The box-office collection of kaabil mentioned in the page is lower than the actual figure.I want to fix this. Acash9934 ( talk) 09:35, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
actual figureand I can update it. Thanks. Vivek Ray ( talk) 11:04, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
One of the critics reviews, Saibal Chaterjee, called the movie Kaabil a paisa vasool, which I read in the reviews section. It said it needed clarification as to what it meant. I am fluent in Hindi and paisa vasool translates to 'waste of money,' which I think is the clarification needed. Thank you for reading this and I'm sorry if I did not understand what clarification was needed. Person2638 ( talk) 19:44, 20 February 2019 (UTC)