This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted on 10 September 2014 by reviewer Coin945 ( talk · contribs). South Africa This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned in the article "Literary Tourism". However, I think that this is not sufficient for it not to be an Orphan article Rchunylall ( talk) 01:42, 23 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Okay, I've also linked this page to he NRF since its a project that has been largely funded through them. Rchunylall ( talk) 01:55, 23 September 2014 (UTC) reply

User:Rchunylall you have used www.literarytourism.co.za as a source for this article. This source does not qualify as an independent source WP:IS. It would be good if you could provide better references. Wayne Jayes ( talk) 20:46, 24 September 2014 (UTC) reply

User:Waynejaynes, thank you for the suggestion. I will make the changes to this article. Rchunylall ( talk) 22:32, 27 September 2014 (UTC) reply

I implore other editors to make changes to this article to make it more accurate and neutral. Rchunylall ( talk) 19:41, 3 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Mbele 41.114.36.220 ( talk) 04:33, 11 February 2022 (UTC) reply