This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Please stop posting some bullshit about "Green Devils" and that no vehicle was destroyed, many of them were. Some beyond repair. Gazeta Wyborcza is not a reliable source of information, some stupid journalist wrote stupid article in that newspaper and you are citing it like it would be worth something. --
Corran.pl (
talk)
10:09, 16 January 2011 (UTC)reply
The KTO Rosomak is "just" a license built Finnish
Patria AMV, not a Polish design, so country of origin should be Finland, not Poland. It's where it was designed that matters, and the AMV/Rosomak was designed by Patria in Finland, not by whoever builds it under license in Poland or elsewhere.
Thomas.W talk21:16, 18 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The Rosomak isn't based on a Finnish design, it is a Finnish design, built under license in Poland with no significant changes made to it. Even
Polish sources say that it's a Finnish AMV built under license in Poland.
Thomas.W talk21:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)reply
It is based on a Finnish design, licenced to Poland and therefore Poland is 110% responsible for its outlook, you cannot continue to call it Finnish just because it hasn't been modified, remember, Poland is what chose not to modify it. The thing is Polish.
Choicerpex (
talk)
21:57, 18 March 2016 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Please stop posting some bullshit about "Green Devils" and that no vehicle was destroyed, many of them were. Some beyond repair. Gazeta Wyborcza is not a reliable source of information, some stupid journalist wrote stupid article in that newspaper and you are citing it like it would be worth something. --
Corran.pl (
talk)
10:09, 16 January 2011 (UTC)reply
The KTO Rosomak is "just" a license built Finnish
Patria AMV, not a Polish design, so country of origin should be Finland, not Poland. It's where it was designed that matters, and the AMV/Rosomak was designed by Patria in Finland, not by whoever builds it under license in Poland or elsewhere.
Thomas.W talk21:16, 18 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The Rosomak isn't based on a Finnish design, it is a Finnish design, built under license in Poland with no significant changes made to it. Even
Polish sources say that it's a Finnish AMV built under license in Poland.
Thomas.W talk21:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)reply
It is based on a Finnish design, licenced to Poland and therefore Poland is 110% responsible for its outlook, you cannot continue to call it Finnish just because it hasn't been modified, remember, Poland is what chose not to modify it. The thing is Polish.
Choicerpex (
talk)
21:57, 18 March 2016 (UTC)reply