What does "about version numbers binary compatibilty, API compatible" mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoe ( talk • contribs) 20 April 2003
Should the KDE versions list be moved to a seperate article, leaving only the minor versions on KDE? Its getting really big, and even though I tablized it, it is still hard to read because of its size. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.32.33.67 ( talk • contribs) 10 March 2004
Do we want a new screenshot seeing as we are now on 3.2? --Anonymous
What's the criterion for a major native applications section? Is the CVS client really a major application the way Konqueror is? If it's just a list of all native apps, it should be named accordingly. -- David Gerard 12:18, Feb 4, 2004 (UTC)
I've done a bit of rewrite (consolidate single-sentence paragraphs, tighten up the writing, grammar tweaks) and reshuffling.
One question: should the timeline go at the top of the article or the bottom? Would a separate written history section make any sense?
Also, does the controversy over Qt's licensing - which was a MAJOR ISSUE at the time - need any more detail? -- David Gerard 14:26, Feb 6, 2004 (UTC)
KonsoleKalendar is a tiny stub article at the moment, and needs some loving attention to be rescued from Votes For Deletion (see MediaWiki:VfD-KonsoleKalendar) -- David Gerard 15:42, May 28, 2004 (UTC)
Shouldn't there be a section comparing and contrasting Gnome and KDE? I mean, that's one of the major disputes these days isn't it? Or at least a better description of the controversy. I know as a current Gnome user thinking of switching over, I had hoped for at least some pros and cons. -- Maru Dubshinki 01:32 Sunday, April 17 2005
a comparison like this won't go anywhere and won't help anyone. if you do a search for KDE vs GNOME it is really inconclusive, at least the sites I visited were inconclusive. Bob Plano 02:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
What does "about version numbers binary compatibilty, API compatible" mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoe ( talk • contribs) 20 April 2003
Should the KDE versions list be moved to a seperate article, leaving only the minor versions on KDE? Its getting really big, and even though I tablized it, it is still hard to read because of its size. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.32.33.67 ( talk • contribs) 10 March 2004
Do we want a new screenshot seeing as we are now on 3.2? --Anonymous
What's the criterion for a major native applications section? Is the CVS client really a major application the way Konqueror is? If it's just a list of all native apps, it should be named accordingly. -- David Gerard 12:18, Feb 4, 2004 (UTC)
I've done a bit of rewrite (consolidate single-sentence paragraphs, tighten up the writing, grammar tweaks) and reshuffling.
One question: should the timeline go at the top of the article or the bottom? Would a separate written history section make any sense?
Also, does the controversy over Qt's licensing - which was a MAJOR ISSUE at the time - need any more detail? -- David Gerard 14:26, Feb 6, 2004 (UTC)
KonsoleKalendar is a tiny stub article at the moment, and needs some loving attention to be rescued from Votes For Deletion (see MediaWiki:VfD-KonsoleKalendar) -- David Gerard 15:42, May 28, 2004 (UTC)
Shouldn't there be a section comparing and contrasting Gnome and KDE? I mean, that's one of the major disputes these days isn't it? Or at least a better description of the controversy. I know as a current Gnome user thinking of switching over, I had hoped for at least some pros and cons. -- Maru Dubshinki 01:32 Sunday, April 17 2005
a comparison like this won't go anywhere and won't help anyone. if you do a search for KDE vs GNOME it is really inconclusive, at least the sites I visited were inconclusive. Bob Plano 02:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)