This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
hey, are we still sure that she was suspended because of calling musk a pedo? Some people claim it's because of community note manipulation. Kryshot64 ( talk) 04:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Is this person notable enough to pass notability guidelines? It seems that pretty much all their coverage in secondary sources is either as scant mentions in collections of tweets around viral events or specifically pertaining to the Goblin Mode stuff (which would mean notability only for involvement in a single event). Paragon Deku ( talk) 06:28, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Not sure what you mean by "ADF", but getting suspended on a Twitter troll account doesn't make someone noteworthy enough to have a Wikipedia page. Especially on an account with under 1 million followers. Jingle38 ( talk) 07:58, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Is this shortdesc particularly sensible? It feels like a term that the average reader would interpret as overly negative.
I've changed it to "Pseudonymous Twitter user" which is more in line with other similar articles ( dril being one of them) WindTempos ( talk • contribs) 14:45, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
In
#Suspension from Twitter, it says:
Libs of TikTok owner Chaya Raichik criticized internet safety expert
Alejandra Caraballo for retweeting the post.
[1]
I'm pretty sure that in this situation, what
Libs of TikTok says is unimportant and probably an issue with
NPOV. Should it be removed?
LilianaUwU (
talk /
contributions) 18:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
References
Not the "@PfpDrawer" bit, but that it was traced from a practical effect puppet designed by Kevin Yagher for an MSN ad in 1999
I dunno! I am simply an IP 71.186.130.36 ( talk) 23:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Why is the article full of transphobic slurs (i.e. “troon”) and misgendering? Why is it locked so that this can’t be corrected? This is deplorable. At least fix it before you lock it. Better yet, delete the fucking article. 70.49.141.73 ( talk) 22:56, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Junlper is not notable enough to qualify for a Wikipedia article. Aknatn ( talk) 02:26, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
I would like some advice here. There are a lot of other sources that talk about Juniper, however they are brief and in the context of a different story. Many articles include Juniper as part of commentary for other topics. Would it be right to add that in, or no? Or maybe like have some quick sentences about things she's commented on? Personisinsterest ( talk) 01:06, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
The redirect JUNIPER has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 23 § JUNIPER until a consensus is reached. Clyde [trout needed] 13:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
The lead section gives several names for this person. None of them are "Juniper". However, the article body exclusively and repeatedly refers to her as "Juniper". I suspect the article body should be changed to use "Junlper". — BarrelProof ( talk) 04:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
None of the sources in the aritcle state that this phrase was added to dictionaries or rose in popularity because of Junlper. Yes, she used the phrase, but I'm not seeing the direct link that supports the claim that she made it popular. Are there reliable sources that do this? -- ZimZalaBim talk 20:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Although first seen on Twitter in 2009, goblin mode went viral on social media in February 2022, quickly making its way into newspapers and magazines after being tweeted in a mocked-up headline.
But according to Google Trends it started to rise in popularity in early February and spiked after a doctored headline attributed a quote with the phrase to Kanye West muse and it-girl of the moment Julia Fox.
Junlper has a new twitter: @Canteverdie this should be mentioned 2.30.180.212 ( talk) 21:21, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
hey, are we still sure that she was suspended because of calling musk a pedo? Some people claim it's because of community note manipulation. Kryshot64 ( talk) 04:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Is this person notable enough to pass notability guidelines? It seems that pretty much all their coverage in secondary sources is either as scant mentions in collections of tweets around viral events or specifically pertaining to the Goblin Mode stuff (which would mean notability only for involvement in a single event). Paragon Deku ( talk) 06:28, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Not sure what you mean by "ADF", but getting suspended on a Twitter troll account doesn't make someone noteworthy enough to have a Wikipedia page. Especially on an account with under 1 million followers. Jingle38 ( talk) 07:58, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Is this shortdesc particularly sensible? It feels like a term that the average reader would interpret as overly negative.
I've changed it to "Pseudonymous Twitter user" which is more in line with other similar articles ( dril being one of them) WindTempos ( talk • contribs) 14:45, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
In
#Suspension from Twitter, it says:
Libs of TikTok owner Chaya Raichik criticized internet safety expert
Alejandra Caraballo for retweeting the post.
[1]
I'm pretty sure that in this situation, what
Libs of TikTok says is unimportant and probably an issue with
NPOV. Should it be removed?
LilianaUwU (
talk /
contributions) 18:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
References
Not the "@PfpDrawer" bit, but that it was traced from a practical effect puppet designed by Kevin Yagher for an MSN ad in 1999
I dunno! I am simply an IP 71.186.130.36 ( talk) 23:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Why is the article full of transphobic slurs (i.e. “troon”) and misgendering? Why is it locked so that this can’t be corrected? This is deplorable. At least fix it before you lock it. Better yet, delete the fucking article. 70.49.141.73 ( talk) 22:56, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Junlper is not notable enough to qualify for a Wikipedia article. Aknatn ( talk) 02:26, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
I would like some advice here. There are a lot of other sources that talk about Juniper, however they are brief and in the context of a different story. Many articles include Juniper as part of commentary for other topics. Would it be right to add that in, or no? Or maybe like have some quick sentences about things she's commented on? Personisinsterest ( talk) 01:06, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
The redirect JUNIPER has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 23 § JUNIPER until a consensus is reached. Clyde [trout needed] 13:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
The lead section gives several names for this person. None of them are "Juniper". However, the article body exclusively and repeatedly refers to her as "Juniper". I suspect the article body should be changed to use "Junlper". — BarrelProof ( talk) 04:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
None of the sources in the aritcle state that this phrase was added to dictionaries or rose in popularity because of Junlper. Yes, she used the phrase, but I'm not seeing the direct link that supports the claim that she made it popular. Are there reliable sources that do this? -- ZimZalaBim talk 20:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Although first seen on Twitter in 2009, goblin mode went viral on social media in February 2022, quickly making its way into newspapers and magazines after being tweeted in a mocked-up headline.
But according to Google Trends it started to rise in popularity in early February and spiked after a doctored headline attributed a quote with the phrase to Kanye West muse and it-girl of the moment Julia Fox.
Junlper has a new twitter: @Canteverdie this should be mentioned 2.30.180.212 ( talk) 21:21, 18 December 2023 (UTC)