Jungle Cruise (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
September 20, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that to animate
conquistadors in
Jungle Cruise, frogs were recorded in a Costa Rican forest? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Has anyone noticed how this is more similar to "The African Queen" in terms of plot? Visokor ( talk) 07:35, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi User:PNW Raven! Kindly see Special:Diff/1037767726 and Special:Diff/1037968288, and please comment before making an unexplained change. Thanks! M. Billoo 15:26, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk · contribs) 02:33, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 02:33, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Working
September update
Good Article review progress box
|
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 10:13, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by M.Billoo2000 ( talk). Nominated by Pamzeis ( talk) at 08:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: New and long enough as a recent GA nomination, article is well sourced covering all material, and a QPQ is done. Please go with the ALT1 hook, as that is more interesting to this article since it relates it back to the ride it's based on. One note, which won't hold up the DYK nom, but many references in the article (including the ALT1 source) have the unnecessary "AMP" in their links. All the citations and archives should be the direct article links, and this should ultimately be addressed in the article. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 15:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 23:38, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi EEBuchanan, thanks for your contributions! There are some concerns I wanted to share.
Kindly check and comment, Thanks! M. Billoo 18:28, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Rtkat3, thanks for your contributions. Kindly see above message here. Also, you recently removed alt text for the poster in infobox; see further above in GA nomination, it was included there. Thanks! M. Billoo 11:32, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
M.Billoo2000 Some Dude From North Carolina Very well. But I had never seen it before now, and I still think it makes the article clunky, less clean and organized, and difficult to read. It makes it hard to find who played which character, too. However, I will not change the credits on this article again, since I have been outvoted and do not want to be accused of edit warring/disruptive editing. Personally, I think that rule in the guidelines at some point needs a very serious review. Other "Good articles" of Disney films such as Toy Story, Toy Story 2, Toy Story 3, A Bug's Life, The Good Dinosaur, WALL-E, to name a few, and "good articles" of other films such as Shrek have their full casts written in nice neat bullet points (Wall-E's has some overly long explanation added which may need to be edited/removed, and I noticed someone messed up Shrek's plot summary with run on sentences again, so that also will need to be addressed. However, the cast lists haven't been reformatted in years, so those points/recent edits are not relevant to the issue at hand.) I will only address the grammar on this article from now on, but I do think someone with more time than I have at the moment really needs to revisit/seriously challenge that rule. Lists are obviously far more neat than blocks of text when trying to explain information that is in a series/needs to be tabulated to show connections. That is just plain common sense, I think. EEBuchanan ( talk) 16:00, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Jungle Cruise (upcoming film) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 10#Jungle Cruise (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 ( talk) 22:38, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Jungle Cruise (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
September 20, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that to animate
conquistadors in
Jungle Cruise, frogs were recorded in a Costa Rican forest? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Has anyone noticed how this is more similar to "The African Queen" in terms of plot? Visokor ( talk) 07:35, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi User:PNW Raven! Kindly see Special:Diff/1037767726 and Special:Diff/1037968288, and please comment before making an unexplained change. Thanks! M. Billoo 15:26, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk · contribs) 02:33, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 02:33, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Working
September update
Good Article review progress box
|
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 10:13, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by M.Billoo2000 ( talk). Nominated by Pamzeis ( talk) at 08:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: New and long enough as a recent GA nomination, article is well sourced covering all material, and a QPQ is done. Please go with the ALT1 hook, as that is more interesting to this article since it relates it back to the ride it's based on. One note, which won't hold up the DYK nom, but many references in the article (including the ALT1 source) have the unnecessary "AMP" in their links. All the citations and archives should be the direct article links, and this should ultimately be addressed in the article. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 15:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 23:38, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi EEBuchanan, thanks for your contributions! There are some concerns I wanted to share.
Kindly check and comment, Thanks! M. Billoo 18:28, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Rtkat3, thanks for your contributions. Kindly see above message here. Also, you recently removed alt text for the poster in infobox; see further above in GA nomination, it was included there. Thanks! M. Billoo 11:32, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
M.Billoo2000 Some Dude From North Carolina Very well. But I had never seen it before now, and I still think it makes the article clunky, less clean and organized, and difficult to read. It makes it hard to find who played which character, too. However, I will not change the credits on this article again, since I have been outvoted and do not want to be accused of edit warring/disruptive editing. Personally, I think that rule in the guidelines at some point needs a very serious review. Other "Good articles" of Disney films such as Toy Story, Toy Story 2, Toy Story 3, A Bug's Life, The Good Dinosaur, WALL-E, to name a few, and "good articles" of other films such as Shrek have their full casts written in nice neat bullet points (Wall-E's has some overly long explanation added which may need to be edited/removed, and I noticed someone messed up Shrek's plot summary with run on sentences again, so that also will need to be addressed. However, the cast lists haven't been reformatted in years, so those points/recent edits are not relevant to the issue at hand.) I will only address the grammar on this article from now on, but I do think someone with more time than I have at the moment really needs to revisit/seriously challenge that rule. Lists are obviously far more neat than blocks of text when trying to explain information that is in a series/needs to be tabulated to show connections. That is just plain common sense, I think. EEBuchanan ( talk) 16:00, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Jungle Cruise (upcoming film) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 10#Jungle Cruise (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 ( talk) 22:38, 10 August 2022 (UTC)