From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Plagiarism issue

This article is largely plagiarised from one of it's sources: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/jan/09/julia-grant-obituary

Drcchutch ( talk) 00:08, 12 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Discussion on MOS:GENDERID for reverting my change?

User:ValarianB. Could we start a discussion here whether your reversion is in accordance with MOS:GENDERID? MOS:GENDERID is under MOS:BLP and as far as I can tell, the topic of this article is certainly not a living person. We can start getting other editors involved in this to make a clear decision on this matter if you prefer. Theheezy ( talk) 02:12, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply

do whatever you feel you must, but it stays out until decided otherwise. ValarianB ( talk) 13:10, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply
Due to our present circumstance, I am compelled to be *unusually* generous.
Do not mistake this generosity for foolishness. I *assure* you, I know all the scores. Theheezy ( talk) 14:51, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply
i have no idea what that even means. ValarianB ( talk) 15:51, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply
I have to agree with ValarianB here; her deadname adds no encyclopædic value to the article and should not be included.
I am also concerned that the message above comes across as a threat and would remind Theheezy of the Universal Code of Conduct. — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 18:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply
Thank you for the gentle reminder about the Universal Code of Conduct. I will take the time to read it carefully. Hopefully this is only a gentle reminder and overall my contributions on wikipedia have been more positive than negative. Theheezy ( talk) 19:53, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Plagiarism issue

This article is largely plagiarised from one of it's sources: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/jan/09/julia-grant-obituary

Drcchutch ( talk) 00:08, 12 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Discussion on MOS:GENDERID for reverting my change?

User:ValarianB. Could we start a discussion here whether your reversion is in accordance with MOS:GENDERID? MOS:GENDERID is under MOS:BLP and as far as I can tell, the topic of this article is certainly not a living person. We can start getting other editors involved in this to make a clear decision on this matter if you prefer. Theheezy ( talk) 02:12, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply

do whatever you feel you must, but it stays out until decided otherwise. ValarianB ( talk) 13:10, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply
Due to our present circumstance, I am compelled to be *unusually* generous.
Do not mistake this generosity for foolishness. I *assure* you, I know all the scores. Theheezy ( talk) 14:51, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply
i have no idea what that even means. ValarianB ( talk) 15:51, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply
I have to agree with ValarianB here; her deadname adds no encyclopædic value to the article and should not be included.
I am also concerned that the message above comes across as a threat and would remind Theheezy of the Universal Code of Conduct. — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 18:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply
Thank you for the gentle reminder about the Universal Code of Conduct. I will take the time to read it carefully. Hopefully this is only a gentle reminder and overall my contributions on wikipedia have been more positive than negative. Theheezy ( talk) 19:53, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook