From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

JIP | Talk 18:01, 26 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Source?

The Jews of the Kurdistan region speak dialects of Aramaic language (see Northeastern Neo-Aramaic), which is not even a distant relative of the Kurdish language spoken by the Muslims of the region. Is there a source for the existence of a different "Judeo Kurdish" language? otherwise this page should be a redirect link to Northeastern Neo-Aramaic. Thanks, Ben Gershon - בן גרשון ( Talk) 04:06, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Since nobody has replied and no source has been given for 3 months (since i put the citation needed template) and over 4 years have passed since the {sources} template was put, I remove this unsourced claim, and put a redirection to Northeastern Neo-Aramaic instead. Ben Gershon - בן גרשון ( Talk) 12:47, 3 October 2011 (UTC) reply
I will put this issue on my checklist for the near future. Greyshark09 ( talk) 21:43, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply
According to this source, Jews of Kurdistan were and still speak (the elderly) the Aramaic dialect. So Judeaeo-Kurdish doesn't sound reliable to exist. Sabar Yona (see [1]), also speaks of Neo-Aramaic, spoken by the Jews of Zakho. Greyshark09 ( talk) 06:54, 26 February 2012 (UTC) reply
That's true. More info about it appears in Yona Sabar's books and in Ido Avneri's books as well. The most precise link would be to Judaeo-Northeastern-Neo-Aramaic, but we don't have such a page (yet) :) both Judaeo-Aramaic and Northeastern-Neo-Aramaic can be good redirects for now; Specifically about the dialect of the Jews of Zakho, we do have an article - Lishana Deni (which as I said is my grandparents native tongue), but it's too specific so redirecting here is better. Thanks GreyShark! Ben Gershon - בן גרשון ( Talk) 16:01, 26 February 2012 (UTC) reply
No problem. Cheers. Greyshark09 ( talk) 17:30, 26 February 2012 (UTC) reply

"the complete supersession of Aramaic"

Is this phrase in the article supposed to mean that Aramaic superseded Hebrew, or that that Aramaic itself was superseded by another language? -- 92.231.116.164 ( talk) 22:47, 21 January 2013 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

JIP | Talk 18:01, 26 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Source?

The Jews of the Kurdistan region speak dialects of Aramaic language (see Northeastern Neo-Aramaic), which is not even a distant relative of the Kurdish language spoken by the Muslims of the region. Is there a source for the existence of a different "Judeo Kurdish" language? otherwise this page should be a redirect link to Northeastern Neo-Aramaic. Thanks, Ben Gershon - בן גרשון ( Talk) 04:06, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Since nobody has replied and no source has been given for 3 months (since i put the citation needed template) and over 4 years have passed since the {sources} template was put, I remove this unsourced claim, and put a redirection to Northeastern Neo-Aramaic instead. Ben Gershon - בן גרשון ( Talk) 12:47, 3 October 2011 (UTC) reply
I will put this issue on my checklist for the near future. Greyshark09 ( talk) 21:43, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply
According to this source, Jews of Kurdistan were and still speak (the elderly) the Aramaic dialect. So Judeaeo-Kurdish doesn't sound reliable to exist. Sabar Yona (see [1]), also speaks of Neo-Aramaic, spoken by the Jews of Zakho. Greyshark09 ( talk) 06:54, 26 February 2012 (UTC) reply
That's true. More info about it appears in Yona Sabar's books and in Ido Avneri's books as well. The most precise link would be to Judaeo-Northeastern-Neo-Aramaic, but we don't have such a page (yet) :) both Judaeo-Aramaic and Northeastern-Neo-Aramaic can be good redirects for now; Specifically about the dialect of the Jews of Zakho, we do have an article - Lishana Deni (which as I said is my grandparents native tongue), but it's too specific so redirecting here is better. Thanks GreyShark! Ben Gershon - בן גרשון ( Talk) 16:01, 26 February 2012 (UTC) reply
No problem. Cheers. Greyshark09 ( talk) 17:30, 26 February 2012 (UTC) reply

"the complete supersession of Aramaic"

Is this phrase in the article supposed to mean that Aramaic superseded Hebrew, or that that Aramaic itself was superseded by another language? -- 92.231.116.164 ( talk) 22:47, 21 January 2013 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook