This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Jozo Zovko is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the
Catholic Church. For more information, visit the
project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
Jozo Zovko is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Yeah, take as long as you like. Before notifying you, I made sure it was you who added the link, or that you even participated in editing the article. :)
Governor Sheng (
talk)
01:46, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
GSheng why are you 'citation needed' spamming on this page? I have proven over and over again that Sullivans book is a reliable secondary source. What you are doing is a disservice to Wikipedia and its readers. Editors cannot just 'citation needed' spam on the books they do not like or agree with, all over a page. It is not about personal preference. If it wasn't so ridiculous, it would be laughable.
Red Rose 13 (
talk)
10:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
You might *think* that you proved something. But... you haven't. Sorry. You're wrong. Regarding Sullivan, other sources proved him wrong, not my own interpretation of his writings. Sullivan is biased, partisan source, who's work wasn't recognized by other scholars (experts) and Grove press that published his book, basically an essay on his religious journey, isn't reputable for publishing scholarly work (they publish novels and belletristic - a genre Sullivan's book belongs to). This is nicely outlined in
WP:SCHOLARSHIP.
Governor Sheng (
talk)
11:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
From the same page "Reliable non-academic sources may also be used in articles about scholarly issues, particularly material from high-quality mainstream publications."
Red Rose 13 (
talk)
22:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Jozo Zovko is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the
Catholic Church. For more information, visit the
project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
Jozo Zovko is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Yeah, take as long as you like. Before notifying you, I made sure it was you who added the link, or that you even participated in editing the article. :)
Governor Sheng (
talk)
01:46, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
GSheng why are you 'citation needed' spamming on this page? I have proven over and over again that Sullivans book is a reliable secondary source. What you are doing is a disservice to Wikipedia and its readers. Editors cannot just 'citation needed' spam on the books they do not like or agree with, all over a page. It is not about personal preference. If it wasn't so ridiculous, it would be laughable.
Red Rose 13 (
talk)
10:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
You might *think* that you proved something. But... you haven't. Sorry. You're wrong. Regarding Sullivan, other sources proved him wrong, not my own interpretation of his writings. Sullivan is biased, partisan source, who's work wasn't recognized by other scholars (experts) and Grove press that published his book, basically an essay on his religious journey, isn't reputable for publishing scholarly work (they publish novels and belletristic - a genre Sullivan's book belongs to). This is nicely outlined in
WP:SCHOLARSHIP.
Governor Sheng (
talk)
11:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
From the same page "Reliable non-academic sources may also be used in articles about scholarly issues, particularly material from high-quality mainstream publications."
Red Rose 13 (
talk)
22:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply