This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Because the link to the journal webpage is broken eh? If this journal isn't being published anymore the article should be adjusted accordingly. Simonm223 ( talk) 20:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
This journal doesn't exactly sound like it deals in legitimate science. It /could/, I suppose, but the only way I can think of is if it pretty much exclusively publishes papers disproving parapsychological concepts (or papers that, in a legitimate scientific way, do lend credence to the concepts). Should it be covered, whichever way it goes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hppavilion1 ( talk • contribs) 21:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
I tagged this article for notability. It does not seem to fit notability criteria for GNG or WP:ORG. --- Steve Quinn ( talk) 03:23, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
It appears that this journal also fails WP:NJOURNALS. Not listed in the Master Journal List of WOS. I didn't check SCOPUS, but I doubt it is currently listed there. --- Steve Quinn ( talk) 03:36, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
There might be coverage in newspapers in the days of yore [1]. I haven't had a chance to go through these sources yet to see what kind of coverage there is. --- Steve Quinn ( talk) 03:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Because the link to the journal webpage is broken eh? If this journal isn't being published anymore the article should be adjusted accordingly. Simonm223 ( talk) 20:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
This journal doesn't exactly sound like it deals in legitimate science. It /could/, I suppose, but the only way I can think of is if it pretty much exclusively publishes papers disproving parapsychological concepts (or papers that, in a legitimate scientific way, do lend credence to the concepts). Should it be covered, whichever way it goes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hppavilion1 ( talk • contribs) 21:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
I tagged this article for notability. It does not seem to fit notability criteria for GNG or WP:ORG. --- Steve Quinn ( talk) 03:23, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
It appears that this journal also fails WP:NJOURNALS. Not listed in the Master Journal List of WOS. I didn't check SCOPUS, but I doubt it is currently listed there. --- Steve Quinn ( talk) 03:36, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
There might be coverage in newspapers in the days of yore [1]. I haven't had a chance to go through these sources yet to see what kind of coverage there is. --- Steve Quinn ( talk) 03:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)