This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Jonathan Ross article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
An article with lot's of information - that's repeated, an presently messy! Rgds, - Trident13 11:19, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Which genius replaced all the Rs with Ws? XD I'd fix it myself if a. it wasn't hilarious (albeit unoriginal) and b. I could be bothered actually going through and changing them all back ... 80.192.131.182 17:28, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
This line: "Taking over presenting of The Film programme in 1999, he began making cameo appearances, playing himself in the Spice Girls' film Spiceworld (1997)" doesn't make sense. It sounds like he began making cameos after 1999, even though the film was released in 97. Leedrick 04:55, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Is Jonathan Ross jewish? Is there a confusion here with the actor called Jonathan Adam Ross who is Jewish? Source please. -- Dumbo1 21:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
On Friday Night with Jonathan Ross on 20 May 2009, he said that he is "not religious". Should that not be added to his profile? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.178.216 ( talk) 00:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Should there be mention of Karl Pilkington's fascinating discussion of Jonathan Ross' penis in episode two of the Ricky Gervais show? -- 71.107.254.235 04:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
No. -- TwentiethApril1986 ( talk) 13:08, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I think anything related to Karl Pilkington is of utmost importance. It should be added at once. -- Dremits ( talk) 17:56, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
This article has been moved around a lot recently: first from Jonathan Ross to Jonathan Ross (Celebrity), then to Jonathan Stephen Ross, then to Jonathan Ross (English TV presenter). There are still a lot of links at Jonathan Ross (currently a disambiguation page, because of Jonathan Ross (senator)) that need to be redirected here, but I'd like to be sure of the consensus about the article name before I correct them. I agree that disambiguation by profession is better than using the middle name, but I'm not sure we need "English TV" in the title; I think Jonathan Ross (presenter) or Jonathan Ross (television presenter) should suffice. (I also know that some Wikipedians dislike the use of the abbreviation "TV" for "television" — hi, Terence!)
Comparison with other disambiguated members of Category:British television presenters may also be illuminating: there's Kaye Adams (presenter), Rick Adams (television presenter), Gordon Burns (television), Jon Bentley (TV presenter), et cetera. I think (looking at the category and its subcats) that "John Smith (television presenter)" is the most common.
What do other editors think? — Josiah Rowe ( talk • contribs) 19:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
FYI, Japanorama is no longer the TWO seasons as mentioned.
Jonathan Ross (television presenter) →
Jonathan Ross —
Since this is the most notable "Jonathan Ross" on Wikipedia, I propose this article be renamed to "Jonathan Ross". There is already a disambiguation page for the other uses which is being referred to by this article.
Rebroad
21:09, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
The notability of the UK celebrity is evidently great; he is one of the most recognisable figures on British television, and has been for some time. The argument is not so easy to make for the US senator. We have full details of his education, and positions filled, from the cradle to the grave, but no sign that he actually did anything as senator worth noting, other than simply being a senator. Against that backdrop, I cannot see any conclusion other than to declare that the TV presenter is much more significant than the US politician, and the move the pages as requested. Yes, Google hits are biased towards recent figures, but sometimes recent figures really are more well-known than older ones. This article has been renamed from Jonathan Ross (television presenter) to Jonathan Ross as the result of a move request. Concomitantly, Jonathan Ross has been moved to Jonathan Ross (disambiguation). -- Stemonitis 20:28, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm not going to formally introduce this at requested moves while the above request is still active but I'd like to bring up the notion that this article should be at Jonathan Ross (broadcaster). The reason being he is a presenter on radio, not just television, (though it is for discussion whether his television presenting career is more notable) and a film critic. The subjects of "presenter" disambiguated articles tend to be just radio and/television presenters but his film critic job brings in a third element. David Frost (broadcaster), Andrew Collins (broadcaster) and Richard Skinner (broadcaster), to name a few, all follow this pattern. Thoughts? WindsorFan 18:57, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
There's no mention of his cameo appearance in HBO and BBC comedy 'Extras' by Steven Merchant and Ricky Gervais. Should be added somewhere!
It is TRUE that ross recorded a cameo for halo3! ive added a brief sentance. Lord Cuthberton —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 21:04, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Is it in any way relevant to add that Jonathan was born a day after those two mentioned blokes died, or that he shared a birtday with Peter Cook? If no one objects I'll be removing that part monday evening. Allthecoolnamesweretaken 19:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Why is there no mention of Woss's -- sorry, Ross's famous speech impediment? I don't know the name for the condition that makes him substitute "w" for "r" (my mum said it's a form of lisp, but the Wiki article doesn't seem to say so), but I think it should be mentioned as it's part of his TV persona -- even he makes light of it. I think it deserves a place on Wi-- sorry, Rikipedia! Dave-ros ( talk) 20:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
The article states he has afacebook profile with 8000 friends. Can I remind everyone this is an encyclopedia and not a trivia magazine. The inclusion of the facebook and how many friends he has is against Wikipedia policies. Perhaps the person who added it, should go and add the same about other celebrities stating how many friends others have. Please remove it. -- 78.86.159.199 ( talk) 16:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
He's from Leytonstone as he has said on his programs various times.
Why has that picture been chosen? Is it supposed to make JR look like a rapist? I recommend finding another one.
FreemDeem ( talk) 18:18, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
{{
editsemiprotected}}
please delete "both"
Cck973 (
talk)
19:16, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
I have spent a short while improving it. If someone else wants to go further I suggest re-writing the broadcasting career section which looks a bit bland now, just reads 'On date and then he did this, then this, then this' etc.-- EchetusXe ( talk) 19:51, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Both weasel words but WP:NPOV and WP:V suggest we go with what is supported by the sources. Since a rather silly edit war has arisen (and will probably end up in WP:LAME) over which to use, and one editor is a floating IP, I have protected the article for three days while you sort this out here. -- Rodhull andemu 16:07, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
I've added an external link to his Twitter Page. I've said it's authenticated, but the only real proof is some pictures he took of himself infront of his PC, which displayed his Twitter page (if that makes sense). It is, as far as I can tell, genuine. Look through the posts for the pics before deleting the link is my advice/opinion/wish/hope/etc :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.59.175 ( talk) 15:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
It has been reported that no people in showbusiness will entertain his show. Tom Cruise has rejected him he stated he has no wish to be involved in the controversy. Most sensible people of medial direction will reject any interface with Jonathan Ross he has become a media pariah, quite rightly so. This should be included in the article. It is quite a unique situation.
As much as I like Jonathan Ross, and as much as I detest having to source the Daily Mail, Ross's integrity as a film reviewer must come into question when he is so chummy with film stars (and film star wannabes) on his chat show. His review of the embarrassingly contrived and terribly acted Lesbian Vampire Killers came on the same Film 2009 show in which he had interviewed its stars in a cloyingly ingratiating manner. If this were on Sky it would be less of a problem, but the Film franchise surely deserves better?
Guardian review, which also believes the film is anything but "fangtastic"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/mar/22/leasbian-vampire-killers
Guv2006 ( talk) 12:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
The "Hannah Montana comment" section incorrectly quotes from Jonathan Ross's comment on a radio show. (The incorrect quote has also appeared in a number of publications.)
The quote is given as:
"If your son asks for a Hannah Montana MP3 player, you might want to already think about putting him down for adoption before he brings his, erm, partner home."
However, Ross actually said:
"If your son asks for a Hannah Montana MP3 player, then you might want to already think about putting him down for adoption in later life when they settle down with their partner"
It is important to get this quote right, as Ross was saying that the hypothetical gay son would adopt a child later in life - ie. the gay son would be the adopter rather than the adoptee. In contrast, the misquote implies that Ross was suggesting gay children should be 'given away' for adoption, which has been the source of the accusations of homophobia.
Original quote available to hear: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isM9mj20c6M
EightPass ( talk) 01:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
The article states that Jonathn Ross and his wife featured in a Neil Gaiman short story; the story appeared in the collection 'Smoke and Mirrors', not 'Fragile Things' HuzzahHenry ( talk) 13:29, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
There is no mention of Americana the 3 part documentary series from 1992 which Ross wrote/narrated. Please add a bit about that. Lowbrau ( talk) 23:00, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
It has just been announced that Ross is leaving the BBC. Reported as breaking news on BBC News channel. It may be best to wait for an article to appear on a news website before including in the article. SimonMayer ( talk) 10:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
The date on the article is incorrect. Can it be updated to the correct time (or sooner?). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.36.100 ( talk) 22:32, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Can we not add it to his occupations? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.143.111 ( talk) 22:52, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Does the comment about Madonna's adopted son at the 2006 British comedy awards qualify as a controversy? The video is here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXEO9P3IBEE —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poikkeusreitti ( talk • contribs) 22:02, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Ross is now an exec at Microsoft - an executive producer for the Xbox Games Divison, apparently. 129.180.175.45 ( talk) 12:40, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Jonathan Ross. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:46, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jonathan Ross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:45, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jonathan Ross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:43, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jonathan Ross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello; the section "Homophobia accusation" has been removed by 90.255.179.206; I reverted this as unexplained content removal, and the IP editor reverted my restoration. Does anyone else have an opinion on whether this section should remain, or comments? Thank you. Tol | Talk | Contribs 23:52, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
So there's a rule against WP:CSECTIONs. Jack Upland ( talk) 05:39, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Jonathan Ross article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
An article with lot's of information - that's repeated, an presently messy! Rgds, - Trident13 11:19, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Which genius replaced all the Rs with Ws? XD I'd fix it myself if a. it wasn't hilarious (albeit unoriginal) and b. I could be bothered actually going through and changing them all back ... 80.192.131.182 17:28, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
This line: "Taking over presenting of The Film programme in 1999, he began making cameo appearances, playing himself in the Spice Girls' film Spiceworld (1997)" doesn't make sense. It sounds like he began making cameos after 1999, even though the film was released in 97. Leedrick 04:55, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Is Jonathan Ross jewish? Is there a confusion here with the actor called Jonathan Adam Ross who is Jewish? Source please. -- Dumbo1 21:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
On Friday Night with Jonathan Ross on 20 May 2009, he said that he is "not religious". Should that not be added to his profile? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.178.216 ( talk) 00:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Should there be mention of Karl Pilkington's fascinating discussion of Jonathan Ross' penis in episode two of the Ricky Gervais show? -- 71.107.254.235 04:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
No. -- TwentiethApril1986 ( talk) 13:08, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I think anything related to Karl Pilkington is of utmost importance. It should be added at once. -- Dremits ( talk) 17:56, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
This article has been moved around a lot recently: first from Jonathan Ross to Jonathan Ross (Celebrity), then to Jonathan Stephen Ross, then to Jonathan Ross (English TV presenter). There are still a lot of links at Jonathan Ross (currently a disambiguation page, because of Jonathan Ross (senator)) that need to be redirected here, but I'd like to be sure of the consensus about the article name before I correct them. I agree that disambiguation by profession is better than using the middle name, but I'm not sure we need "English TV" in the title; I think Jonathan Ross (presenter) or Jonathan Ross (television presenter) should suffice. (I also know that some Wikipedians dislike the use of the abbreviation "TV" for "television" — hi, Terence!)
Comparison with other disambiguated members of Category:British television presenters may also be illuminating: there's Kaye Adams (presenter), Rick Adams (television presenter), Gordon Burns (television), Jon Bentley (TV presenter), et cetera. I think (looking at the category and its subcats) that "John Smith (television presenter)" is the most common.
What do other editors think? — Josiah Rowe ( talk • contribs) 19:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
FYI, Japanorama is no longer the TWO seasons as mentioned.
Jonathan Ross (television presenter) →
Jonathan Ross —
Since this is the most notable "Jonathan Ross" on Wikipedia, I propose this article be renamed to "Jonathan Ross". There is already a disambiguation page for the other uses which is being referred to by this article.
Rebroad
21:09, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
The notability of the UK celebrity is evidently great; he is one of the most recognisable figures on British television, and has been for some time. The argument is not so easy to make for the US senator. We have full details of his education, and positions filled, from the cradle to the grave, but no sign that he actually did anything as senator worth noting, other than simply being a senator. Against that backdrop, I cannot see any conclusion other than to declare that the TV presenter is much more significant than the US politician, and the move the pages as requested. Yes, Google hits are biased towards recent figures, but sometimes recent figures really are more well-known than older ones. This article has been renamed from Jonathan Ross (television presenter) to Jonathan Ross as the result of a move request. Concomitantly, Jonathan Ross has been moved to Jonathan Ross (disambiguation). -- Stemonitis 20:28, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm not going to formally introduce this at requested moves while the above request is still active but I'd like to bring up the notion that this article should be at Jonathan Ross (broadcaster). The reason being he is a presenter on radio, not just television, (though it is for discussion whether his television presenting career is more notable) and a film critic. The subjects of "presenter" disambiguated articles tend to be just radio and/television presenters but his film critic job brings in a third element. David Frost (broadcaster), Andrew Collins (broadcaster) and Richard Skinner (broadcaster), to name a few, all follow this pattern. Thoughts? WindsorFan 18:57, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
There's no mention of his cameo appearance in HBO and BBC comedy 'Extras' by Steven Merchant and Ricky Gervais. Should be added somewhere!
It is TRUE that ross recorded a cameo for halo3! ive added a brief sentance. Lord Cuthberton —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 21:04, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Is it in any way relevant to add that Jonathan was born a day after those two mentioned blokes died, or that he shared a birtday with Peter Cook? If no one objects I'll be removing that part monday evening. Allthecoolnamesweretaken 19:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Why is there no mention of Woss's -- sorry, Ross's famous speech impediment? I don't know the name for the condition that makes him substitute "w" for "r" (my mum said it's a form of lisp, but the Wiki article doesn't seem to say so), but I think it should be mentioned as it's part of his TV persona -- even he makes light of it. I think it deserves a place on Wi-- sorry, Rikipedia! Dave-ros ( talk) 20:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
The article states he has afacebook profile with 8000 friends. Can I remind everyone this is an encyclopedia and not a trivia magazine. The inclusion of the facebook and how many friends he has is against Wikipedia policies. Perhaps the person who added it, should go and add the same about other celebrities stating how many friends others have. Please remove it. -- 78.86.159.199 ( talk) 16:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
He's from Leytonstone as he has said on his programs various times.
Why has that picture been chosen? Is it supposed to make JR look like a rapist? I recommend finding another one.
FreemDeem ( talk) 18:18, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
{{
editsemiprotected}}
please delete "both"
Cck973 (
talk)
19:16, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
I have spent a short while improving it. If someone else wants to go further I suggest re-writing the broadcasting career section which looks a bit bland now, just reads 'On date and then he did this, then this, then this' etc.-- EchetusXe ( talk) 19:51, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Both weasel words but WP:NPOV and WP:V suggest we go with what is supported by the sources. Since a rather silly edit war has arisen (and will probably end up in WP:LAME) over which to use, and one editor is a floating IP, I have protected the article for three days while you sort this out here. -- Rodhull andemu 16:07, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
I've added an external link to his Twitter Page. I've said it's authenticated, but the only real proof is some pictures he took of himself infront of his PC, which displayed his Twitter page (if that makes sense). It is, as far as I can tell, genuine. Look through the posts for the pics before deleting the link is my advice/opinion/wish/hope/etc :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.59.175 ( talk) 15:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
It has been reported that no people in showbusiness will entertain his show. Tom Cruise has rejected him he stated he has no wish to be involved in the controversy. Most sensible people of medial direction will reject any interface with Jonathan Ross he has become a media pariah, quite rightly so. This should be included in the article. It is quite a unique situation.
As much as I like Jonathan Ross, and as much as I detest having to source the Daily Mail, Ross's integrity as a film reviewer must come into question when he is so chummy with film stars (and film star wannabes) on his chat show. His review of the embarrassingly contrived and terribly acted Lesbian Vampire Killers came on the same Film 2009 show in which he had interviewed its stars in a cloyingly ingratiating manner. If this were on Sky it would be less of a problem, but the Film franchise surely deserves better?
Guardian review, which also believes the film is anything but "fangtastic"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/mar/22/leasbian-vampire-killers
Guv2006 ( talk) 12:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
The "Hannah Montana comment" section incorrectly quotes from Jonathan Ross's comment on a radio show. (The incorrect quote has also appeared in a number of publications.)
The quote is given as:
"If your son asks for a Hannah Montana MP3 player, you might want to already think about putting him down for adoption before he brings his, erm, partner home."
However, Ross actually said:
"If your son asks for a Hannah Montana MP3 player, then you might want to already think about putting him down for adoption in later life when they settle down with their partner"
It is important to get this quote right, as Ross was saying that the hypothetical gay son would adopt a child later in life - ie. the gay son would be the adopter rather than the adoptee. In contrast, the misquote implies that Ross was suggesting gay children should be 'given away' for adoption, which has been the source of the accusations of homophobia.
Original quote available to hear: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isM9mj20c6M
EightPass ( talk) 01:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
The article states that Jonathn Ross and his wife featured in a Neil Gaiman short story; the story appeared in the collection 'Smoke and Mirrors', not 'Fragile Things' HuzzahHenry ( talk) 13:29, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
There is no mention of Americana the 3 part documentary series from 1992 which Ross wrote/narrated. Please add a bit about that. Lowbrau ( talk) 23:00, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
It has just been announced that Ross is leaving the BBC. Reported as breaking news on BBC News channel. It may be best to wait for an article to appear on a news website before including in the article. SimonMayer ( talk) 10:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
The date on the article is incorrect. Can it be updated to the correct time (or sooner?). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.36.100 ( talk) 22:32, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Can we not add it to his occupations? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.143.111 ( talk) 22:52, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Does the comment about Madonna's adopted son at the 2006 British comedy awards qualify as a controversy? The video is here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXEO9P3IBEE —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poikkeusreitti ( talk • contribs) 22:02, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Ross is now an exec at Microsoft - an executive producer for the Xbox Games Divison, apparently. 129.180.175.45 ( talk) 12:40, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Jonathan Ross. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:46, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jonathan Ross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:45, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jonathan Ross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:43, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jonathan Ross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello; the section "Homophobia accusation" has been removed by 90.255.179.206; I reverted this as unexplained content removal, and the IP editor reverted my restoration. Does anyone else have an opinion on whether this section should remain, or comments? Thank you. Tol | Talk | Contribs 23:52, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
So there's a rule against WP:CSECTIONs. Jack Upland ( talk) 05:39, 21 September 2023 (UTC)