This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It may be worth noting that earlier citations identify Quentin Turnbull as a wealthy Southern plantation owner, but more recent citations instead identify him as a voodoo practitioner. I'm not sure if it is a combined role or if there was a redefinition of the character, so in the meantime, I'm describing him as "voodoo practitioner" until there is clarification. — Erik ( talk • contrib) 22:33, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
In the section "Premise" there is this: "...voodoo practioner Quentin Turnbull...plans to free the Confederate South with an army of the undead." I must ask, free it from what? The cited source, which uses the word "liberate," doesn't elaborate either, I admit, but does that justify leaving this just dangling? Is it within regs to state that this is not explained, at least as of yet? -- Ted Watson ( talk) 20:01, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
I clicked on the linked-in article "Will Arnett joins 'Jonah Hex'," and found to my surprise that one has to pay money to be able to read it. What do Wiki regs say about this sort of difficult-to-check "source"? -- Tbrittreid ( talk) 21:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
No, not really. Not enough for that trouble, certainly. I was just a ittle curious. Thanks for the offer, though. -- Tbrittreid ( talk) 22:22, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
The newly added image bears the caption, "Brolin, Fox, and Fassbender promoting the film at the 2009 San Diego Comic-Con International." Who is Fassbender? I cannot find that name anywhere else in this article, so if he was just some Con official this is not how the caption should read. -- Tbrittreid ( talk) 20:53, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
I think the whole premise section could do with a re-write. I half heartedly attempted to correct spelling and punctuation, but you can't polish a turd. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.165.29.88 ( talk) 14:05, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
I disagree with JayHenry's comment that the lack of promotion comment is "obviously true and supported by sources". Warner Brothers had a website, facebook group, ran tv ads etc for the film in the lead-up to release. There was some comments on fan sites that WB's left it a bit late, but not sure that equals proof of the matter. Needs some references added to that sentences to back it up. MopyNZ ( talk) 11:46, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Conrad T. Pino ( talk) 12:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Reverted reversion "14:45, February 27, 2014 93.107.219.156 (talk) . . (25,068 bytes) (+1,709) . . (It was part of the promotion of the film. Not clear why you'd expect ongoing availability of the merchandise. Undid revision 597057982 by ConradPino (talk)) (undo)" for these policy reasons:
Conrad T. Pino ( talk) 06:07, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Hmm. Your reasons make sense, the sources aren't great and it isn't written in a more general marketing/promotion way. Seems a shame to remove edits people added in good faith but there isn't anything particularly special about this merchandise. -- 147.252.95.85 ( talk) 12:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jonah Hex (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It may be worth noting that earlier citations identify Quentin Turnbull as a wealthy Southern plantation owner, but more recent citations instead identify him as a voodoo practitioner. I'm not sure if it is a combined role or if there was a redefinition of the character, so in the meantime, I'm describing him as "voodoo practitioner" until there is clarification. — Erik ( talk • contrib) 22:33, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
In the section "Premise" there is this: "...voodoo practioner Quentin Turnbull...plans to free the Confederate South with an army of the undead." I must ask, free it from what? The cited source, which uses the word "liberate," doesn't elaborate either, I admit, but does that justify leaving this just dangling? Is it within regs to state that this is not explained, at least as of yet? -- Ted Watson ( talk) 20:01, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
I clicked on the linked-in article "Will Arnett joins 'Jonah Hex'," and found to my surprise that one has to pay money to be able to read it. What do Wiki regs say about this sort of difficult-to-check "source"? -- Tbrittreid ( talk) 21:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
No, not really. Not enough for that trouble, certainly. I was just a ittle curious. Thanks for the offer, though. -- Tbrittreid ( talk) 22:22, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
The newly added image bears the caption, "Brolin, Fox, and Fassbender promoting the film at the 2009 San Diego Comic-Con International." Who is Fassbender? I cannot find that name anywhere else in this article, so if he was just some Con official this is not how the caption should read. -- Tbrittreid ( talk) 20:53, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
I think the whole premise section could do with a re-write. I half heartedly attempted to correct spelling and punctuation, but you can't polish a turd. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.165.29.88 ( talk) 14:05, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
I disagree with JayHenry's comment that the lack of promotion comment is "obviously true and supported by sources". Warner Brothers had a website, facebook group, ran tv ads etc for the film in the lead-up to release. There was some comments on fan sites that WB's left it a bit late, but not sure that equals proof of the matter. Needs some references added to that sentences to back it up. MopyNZ ( talk) 11:46, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Conrad T. Pino ( talk) 12:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Reverted reversion "14:45, February 27, 2014 93.107.219.156 (talk) . . (25,068 bytes) (+1,709) . . (It was part of the promotion of the film. Not clear why you'd expect ongoing availability of the merchandise. Undid revision 597057982 by ConradPino (talk)) (undo)" for these policy reasons:
Conrad T. Pino ( talk) 06:07, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Hmm. Your reasons make sense, the sources aren't great and it isn't written in a more general marketing/promotion way. Seems a shame to remove edits people added in good faith but there isn't anything particularly special about this merchandise. -- 147.252.95.85 ( talk) 12:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jonah Hex (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)