![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
An IP editor has just removed the budget information for the film. Could someone add this back into the Production section and the Infobox after verifying the numbers. CodexJustin ( talk) 15:50, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
The actor who portrayed the Adjudicator is non-binary and favors they/them, and unless I'm forgetting, I don't think the Adjudicator was referred to as a woman by anyone in the film. Should it stay "she," be changed to a gender-neutral pronoun, or should the plot synopsis just be written so that no pronouns are used for them? Tutwater ( talk) 01:22, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
The following Inverse interview confirms that the Adjudicator is non-binary, and Dillon uses "their" and "they" in reference to them. I'll go ahead and remove "she" from Plot- if this needs to be sourced or go under Production, feel free to cite the above interview. Tutwater ( talk) 17:16, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
So even a production source explicitly calling the character by the singular "they" isn't sufficient reason to use the same pronoun in the plot synopsis?Not unless that production source is explicitly cited in-line where the pronoun in question is used, no. The plot summary (a) must consist exclusively of content that is clear from a plain viewing of the film itself, or (b) must cite secondary sources like my Tenjin no Honji or Matsuranomiya Monogatari articles. It is not allowed to contain content gleaned from secondary sources cited on the article talk page, retrieved after the fact because of outside knowledge of the gender identity of the actor who played the character (especially when the said actor has historically played mostly female-gendered roles with names like "Homeless woman", "Line Lady #1", and "Bald Girl"). Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 05:26, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
It's not a foregone conclusion yet, but I think if it comes to pass that this is the film to break the streak it should probably be mentioned. Charting With Dan on Monday (California time) is almost certain to mention it anyway. Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 02:29, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
John Wick’s name is incorrect and the plot has too many "He"'s in it. 80.2.20.47 ( talk) 18:51, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
An IP editor has just removed the budget information for the film. Could someone add this back into the Production section and the Infobox after verifying the numbers. CodexJustin ( talk) 15:50, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
The actor who portrayed the Adjudicator is non-binary and favors they/them, and unless I'm forgetting, I don't think the Adjudicator was referred to as a woman by anyone in the film. Should it stay "she," be changed to a gender-neutral pronoun, or should the plot synopsis just be written so that no pronouns are used for them? Tutwater ( talk) 01:22, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
The following Inverse interview confirms that the Adjudicator is non-binary, and Dillon uses "their" and "they" in reference to them. I'll go ahead and remove "she" from Plot- if this needs to be sourced or go under Production, feel free to cite the above interview. Tutwater ( talk) 17:16, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
So even a production source explicitly calling the character by the singular "they" isn't sufficient reason to use the same pronoun in the plot synopsis?Not unless that production source is explicitly cited in-line where the pronoun in question is used, no. The plot summary (a) must consist exclusively of content that is clear from a plain viewing of the film itself, or (b) must cite secondary sources like my Tenjin no Honji or Matsuranomiya Monogatari articles. It is not allowed to contain content gleaned from secondary sources cited on the article talk page, retrieved after the fact because of outside knowledge of the gender identity of the actor who played the character (especially when the said actor has historically played mostly female-gendered roles with names like "Homeless woman", "Line Lady #1", and "Bald Girl"). Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 05:26, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
It's not a foregone conclusion yet, but I think if it comes to pass that this is the film to break the streak it should probably be mentioned. Charting With Dan on Monday (California time) is almost certain to mention it anyway. Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 02:29, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
John Wick’s name is incorrect and the plot has too many "He"'s in it. 80.2.20.47 ( talk) 18:51, 19 May 2019 (UTC)